H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Tommy Haas vs Juan Monaco H2H: 1-4
Juan Monaco holds a 4–1 lead over Tommy Haas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Juan Monaco leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Juan Monaco won the 2012 Hamburg final 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 48
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
4
5 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 42
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2012* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | F | Clay | Juan Monaco | 7-5 6-4 | Tommy Haas | Match data |
| Sep 4, 2011* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Juan Monaco | 6-7(3) 6-3 6-2 6-3 | Tommy Haas | Match data |
| Aug 16, 2011* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Juan Monaco | 6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 | Tommy Haas | Match data |
| Oct 18, 2007* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Juan Monaco | 6-4 7-5 | Tommy Haas | Match data |
| Oct 13, 2007* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Tommy Haas | 6-3 6-3 | Juan Monaco | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Haas | #616 | #2 | 3,030 | 2,103 | 533 | 330 | 61.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 15 |
| Juan Monaco | #226 | #10 | 2,775 | 2,046 | 319 | 256 | 55.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tommy Haas | Juan Monaco | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1996 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #170 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #45 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #34 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #73 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #85 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #23 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #8 | 2,009 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #23 | 1,864 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2002 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,849 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #46 | 1,768 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #30 | 1,850 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2004 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #17 | 1,909 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #26 | 1,838 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2005 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,766 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #26 | 1,932 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2006 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #11 | 1,893 | 0 | 10 | 2012 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #12 | 1,944 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2007 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #12 | 1,892 | 0 | 11 | 2013 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2008 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #82 | 1,855 | 0 | 11 | 2014 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #62 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 2009 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,913 | 0 | 12 | 2015 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #53 | 1,811 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #372 | 1,844 | 0 | 12 | 2016 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #65 | 1,864 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | 2011 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #205 | 1,762 | 0 | 12 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,805 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | 2012 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,966 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2013 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #12 | 2,011 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2014 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #77 | 1,904 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2015 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #470 | 1,784 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2017 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #252 | 1,686 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |