H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Karol Kucera H2H: 1-2

Karol Kucera holds a 2–1 lead over Tommy Haas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Karol Kucera leads 2–0 on carpet, while Tommy Haas leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2002 US Open second round 6-1 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Karol Kucera
SVK Age 52 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 30, 2002* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Tommy Haas #3 6-1 6-4 6-4 Karol Kucera #72 Match data
Oct 16, 1998* Vienna ATP 250 R16 Carpet Karol Kucera #7 7-5 6-4 Tommy Haas #37 Match data
Oct 10, 1997* Vienna ATP 250 R16 Carpet Karol Kucera #32 6-1 6-3 Tommy Haas #75 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15
Karol Kucera #1,540 #6 2,732 1,994 259 230 53.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Karol Kucera
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1991 1–1 50.0% #352 1,509 0 0
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% #210 1,506 0 0
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0 1993 1–3 25.0% #159 1,492 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0 1994 13–13 50.0% #54 1,615 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1 1995 21–27 43.8% #79 1,623 0 1
22 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1 1996 17–24 41.5% #63 1,656 0 1
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5 1997 33–27 55.0% #24 1,831 0 2
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5 1998 48–27 64.0% #8 1,844 0 4
25 — — — — — — — 1999 38–20 65.5% #17 1,851 0 5
26 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7 2000 22–21 51.2% #73 1,764 0 5
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7 2001 11–13 45.8% #101 1,721 0 5
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10 2002 18–16 52.9% #83 1,755 0 5
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11 2003 24–18 57.1% #40 1,764 0 6
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11 2004 9–14 39.1% #91 1,674 0 6
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12 2005 3–5 37.5% #310 1,669 0 6
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13 — — — — — — —
35 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15 — — — — — — —