H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Magnus Gustafsson H2H: 3-3

Tommy Haas and Magnus Gustafsson are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2001 Moscow quarterfinal 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Magnus Gustafsson
SWE Age 59 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 6, 2001* Moscow ATP 250 QF Carpet Tommy Haas #17 6-1 6-4 Magnus Gustafsson #85 Match data
Mar 2, 2001* San Jose ATP 250 R16 Hard Tommy Haas #21 4-6 6-3 6-4 Magnus Gustafsson #78 Match data
Nov 12, 1999* Stockholm ATP 250 R16 Hard Magnus Gustafsson #68 6-3 7-6(7) Tommy Haas #14 Match data
Nov 7, 1998* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R16 Carpet Magnus Gustafsson #33 6-4 6-2 Tommy Haas #38 Match data
Jul 23, 1998* Stuttgart Outdoor ATP 250 R32 Clay Magnus Gustafsson #24 6-3 6-1 Tommy Haas #42 Match data
May 14, 1997* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Tommy Haas #82 3-6 6-4 7-5 Magnus Gustafsson #37 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15
Magnus Gustafsson #681 #10 2,141 2,012 394 252 61.0% 0 0 0 0 14 14

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Magnus Gustafsson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0 1986 0–2 0.0% #273 1,479 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0 1987 5–4 55.6% #53 1,586 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1 1988 24–19 55.8% #51 1,710 0 0
22 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1 1989 23–18 56.1% #34 1,804 0 0
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5 1990 25–16 61.0% #31 1,825 0 0
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5 1991 47–17 73.4% #12 1,947 0 3
25 — — — — — — — 1992 26–20 56.5% #47 1,787 0 4
26 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7 1993 50–29 63.3% #14 1,891 0 5
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7 1994 26–11 70.3% #33 1,857 0 7
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10 1995 11–11 50.0% #84 1,732 0 7
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11 1996 36–16 69.2% #17 1,899 0 9
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11 1997 26–18 59.1% #37 1,830 0 10
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12 1998 37–21 63.8% #32 1,874 0 12
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12 1999 22–18 55.0% #60 1,802 0 13
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12 2000 17–14 54.8% #82 1,718 0 14
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13 2001 19–18 51.4% #82 1,695 0 14
35 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15 — — — — — — —