H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Magnus Gustafsson H2H: 3-3

Tommy Haas and Magnus Gustafsson are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2001 Moscow quarterfinal 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Magnus Gustafsson
SWE Age 59 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tommy Haas #17 6-1 6-4 Magnus Gustafsson #85 Match data Oct 6, 2001* QF Moscow ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Tommy Haas #21 4-6 6-3 6-4 Magnus Gustafsson #78 Match data Mar 2, 2001* R16 San Jose ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Magnus Gustafsson #68 6-3 7-6(7) Tommy Haas #14 Match data Nov 12, 1999* R16 Stockholm Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Magnus Gustafsson #33 6-4 6-2 Tommy Haas #38 Match data Nov 7, 1998* R16 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Carpet
Magnus Gustafsson #24 6-3 6-1 Tommy Haas #42 Match data Jul 23, 1998* R32 Stuttgart Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay
Tommy Haas #82 3-6 6-4 7-5 Magnus Gustafsson #37 Match data May 14, 1997* R64 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,116 540 333 61.9% 0 1 0 4 10 15
Magnus Gustafsson #681 #10 2,141 2,013 396 254 60.9% 0 0 0 2 12 14

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Magnus Gustafsson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,588 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,722 0 0 1986 0–2 0.0% #273 1,479 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,820 0 0 1987 5–4 55.6% #53 1,585 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,833 0 1 1988 24–19 55.8% #51 1,710 0 0
22 2000 32–21 60.4% #23 1,813 0 1 1989 23–18 56.1% #34 1,807 0 0
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,011 0 5 1990 25–16 61.0% #31 1,840 0 0
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,863 0 5 1991 47–17 73.4% #12 1,948 0 3
25 — — — — — — — 1992 27–21 56.2% #47 1,778 0 4
26 2004 36–19 65.5% #17 1,916 0 7 1993 50–29 63.3% #14 1,892 0 5
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,767 0 7 1994 26–11 70.3% #33 1,859 0 7
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,892 0 10 1995 11–11 50.0% #84 1,734 0 7
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,894 0 11 1996 37–17 68.5% #17 1,891 0 9
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,857 0 11 1997 26–18 59.1% #37 1,829 0 10
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,940 0 12 1998 37–21 63.8% #32 1,874 0 12
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,865 0 12 1999 22–18 55.0% #60 1,800 0 13
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,771 0 12 2000 17–14 54.8% #82 1,718 0 14
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,975 0 13 2001 19–18 51.4% #82 1,695 0 14
35 2013 47–24 66.2% #12 2,024 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,911 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,788 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,689 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tommy Haas Magnus Gustafsson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1996 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 10 8 18 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1986 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 18 15 33 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1987 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1999 25 12 37 67.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1988 7 6 13 53.8% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
22 2000 18 9 27 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1989 7 6 13 53.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 4 12 66.7%
23 2001 41 12 53 77.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 1990 5 4 9 55.6% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 11 7 18 61.1%
24 2002 25 14 39 64.1% 17 7 24 70.8% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 7 5 12 58.3% 36 8 44 81.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 6 7 13 46.2% 19 10 29 65.5% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3%
26 2004 24 11 35 68.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 2 6 8 25.0% 38 15 53 71.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
27 2005 15 12 27 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1994 14 2 16 87.5% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5%
28 2006 34 10 44 77.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
29 2007 31 13 44 70.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1996 2 4 6 33.3% 14 6 20 70.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 16 5 21 76.2%
30 2008 15 11 26 57.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1997 9 5 14 64.3% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0%
31 2009 15 14 29 51.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — — 1998 10 9 19 52.6% 16 8 24 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 3 12 75.0%
32 2010 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 6 4 10 60.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 4 14 71.4%
33 2011 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2000 3 4 7 42.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
34 2012 16 12 28 57.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — 2001 5 6 11 45.5% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
35 2013 28 15 43 65.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 7 6 13 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 0 3 3 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 335 197 532 63.0% 117 82 199 58.8% 57 34 91 62.6% 31 20 51 60.8% — 88 73 161 54.7% 198 109 307 64.5% 18 18 36 50.0% 92 54 146 63.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 805/873 of Tommy Haas's and 452/514 of Magnus Gustafsson's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tommy Haas Magnus Gustafsson
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1996 7/7 3.7 3.9 53.5% 70.9% 59.6% 71.3% 67.6% 65.3% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 36/39 5.5 3.8 59.8% 71.0% 49.5% 55.1% 44.9% 62.5% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 51/60 4.9 4.1 58.9% 71.1% 48.0% 55.1% 44.2% 61.3% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1999 54/68 8.4 5.6 53.0% 76.3% 50.6% 62.2% 43.2% 64.2% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2000 39/53 7.0 4.4 54.3% 74.2% 51.0% 59.5% 43.0% 63.5% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2001 62/74 7.7 3.9 56.4% 76.7% 52.4% 64.4% 42.5% 66.0% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2002 58/65 8.8 4.8 56.0% 75.4% 52.7% 61.9% 39.6% 65.5% 37.1% 1991 56/64 1.9 2.8 68.4% 65.4% 51.7% 53.5% 49.8% 60.9% 44.8%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 45/48 1.8 2.8 67.5% 67.7% 47.9% 60.6% 39.4% 61.4% 40.9%
26 2004 53/55 5.9 3.4 57.9% 75.9% 52.0% 57.3% 46.4% 65.7% 39.2% 1993 71/79 1.7 2.3 70.1% 67.0% 49.8% 59.8% 43.1% 62.1% 41.6%
27 2005 49/49 6.7 3.6 57.8% 74.3% 52.7% 52.9% 43.6% 65.2% 37.8% 1994 33/37 1.8 4.2 64.6% 67.4% 52.9% 54.1% 49.3% 62.2% 46.2%
28 2006 67/67 7.1 3.2 61.0% 76.4% 54.5% 60.1% 40.2% 67.9% 38.3% 1995 20/22 2.4 3.9 62.4% 65.9% 48.8% 49.0% 54.4% 59.8% 43.8%
29 2007 52/53 8.0 3.0 60.6% 78.1% 55.6% 61.9% 43.3% 69.0% 38.7% 1996 47/54 3.4 3.4 62.9% 68.9% 51.5% 54.5% 48.2% 62.6% 43.2%
30 2008 32/33 7.3 3.8 59.4% 72.6% 52.0% 62.8% 40.9% 64.3% 38.1% 1997 40/44 4.1 4.8 62.2% 69.5% 48.5% 62.6% 45.2% 61.8% 41.1%
31 2009 48/49 9.1 4.9 60.2% 77.6% 53.0% 65.4% 44.8% 67.7% 35.3% 1998 51/58 3.0 3.8 62.7% 71.8% 54.3% 60.3% 46.0% 65.4% 41.6%
32 2010 7/7 9.9 4.6 60.9% 72.3% 50.5% 65.2% 38.4% 63.4% 35.1% 1999 34/40 4.0 4.1 62.6% 71.5% 49.7% 57.8% 47.5% 63.5% 37.8%
33 2011 19/19 7.8 4.3 59.9% 70.7% 51.7% 60.5% 43.6% 62.9% 34.9% 2000 24/31 4.1 4.1 62.6% 70.0% 52.1% 62.9% 32.1% 63.1% 37.1%
34 2012 47/48 6.2 3.4 59.6% 75.7% 53.9% 65.6% 43.9% 66.9% 39.1% 2001 31/37 3.4 3.5 61.6% 68.1% 46.7% 56.1% 43.0% 59.9% 39.0%
35 2013 68/71 6.1 3.3 61.3% 74.8% 54.0% 63.0% 41.1% 66.6% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 25/25 4.6 2.0 63.7% 72.2% 53.8% 56.5% 49.5% 65.3% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 11/11 4.0 4.7 62.5% 70.1% 50.4% 52.3% 31.9% 62.8% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 20/20 4.8 4.1 61.9% 68.9% 54.0% 61.4% 29.9% 63.1% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 805/873 6.9 3.9 58.7% 74.7% 52.5% 60.6% 42.7% 65.5% 37.5% — 452/650 2.7 3.4 65.1% 68.4% 50.5% 57.7% 45.3% 62.2% 41.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tommy Haas Magnus Gustafsson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1996 1588 144.9 +0.04 +2.74 1.057 51.8% +30 — — 58.8% +0.77 0–1 2–0 — -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 1723 139.6 +1.11 +0.51 1.027 50.7% -2 -80 -102 54.9% +0.37 9–8 (53%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.37 1986 1479 101.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — +0.07
20 1998 1821 150.9 +0.55 +1.94 1.010 50.5% -13 -133 -149 51.4% +0.19 10–6 (63%) 10–9 (53%) — -2.69 1987 1585 136.3 — — — — +30 — — 57.1% +0.67 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.80
21 1999 1833 148.8 +1.86 -1.09 1.003 50.2% +21 -62 -115 60.7% +0.62 13–7 (65%) 20–19 (51%) — +0.33 1988 1711 136.3 — — — — -69 -22 -159 57.0% +0.35 3–6 (33%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.55
22 2000 1814 145.1 +1.31 -0.68 0.983 49.9% +30 -33 -96 53.0% +0.31 14–3 (82%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.61 1989 1808 142.7 — — — — -23 -102 — 53.2% -0.01 6–4 (60%) 4–5 (44%) — -1.65
23 2001 2012 160.6 +4.03 +2.88 1.170 52.7% +26 -246 -364 67.6% +1.30 17–3 (85%) 13–18 (42%) — -1.10 1990 1840 149.5 — — — — -49 +14 — 55.6% +0.54 10–4 (71%) 10–10 (50%) — +0.25
24 2002 1863 149.4 +3.04 +0.31 1.074 51.4% +35 +17 — 62.0% +0.66 19–7 (73%) 17–11 (61%) — +1.60 1991 1949 159.0 +0.58 +5.54 1.147 52.8% -132 +89 — 63.8% +0.92 16–6 (73%) 11–9 (55%) — -3.91
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1779 142.7 +0.62 +1.82 1.059 51.0% -45 +128 — 53.3% +0.38 12–3 (80%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.22
26 2004 1917 153.9 +3.05 +2.94 1.143 52.4% +36 -67 -248 60.3% +0.68 10–5 (67%) 9–10 (47%) — -2.50 1993 1893 150.4 +1.06 +2.75 1.097 51.7% -102 +32 — 59.5% +0.62 15–10 (60%) 14–12 (54%) — +0.12
27 2005 1767 138.3 +1.76 +0.90 1.088 51.1% +34 +44 -63 58.6% +0.48 4–8 (33%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.64 1994 1859 150.9 +1.06 +5.93 1.223 53.7% +38 +2 — 63.9% +1.13 7–5 (58%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.24
28 2006 1892 153.4 +4.99 +1.83 1.194 52.7% +57 -145 -124 69.5% +1.12 13–8 (62%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.81 1995 1734 129.3 -0.71 +2.58 1.088 51.6% +88 +66 — 52.7% +0.38 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.26
29 2007 1894 152.7 +4.56 +2.83 1.249 53.6% +31 -196 -35 65.2% +1.02 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) — +2.11 1996 1892 151.9 +0.89 +4.77 1.158 52.8% +3 -36 -192 63.8% +1.00 8–7 (53%) 14–12 (54%) — -1.57
30 2008 1858 140.5 +1.47 +1.79 1.068 51.1% +30 — +20 54.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.96 1997 1830 140.1 +0.02 +2.59 1.074 51.1% +63 -24 -144 55.0% +0.47 12–7 (63%) 8–11 (42%) — +1.51
31 2009 1941 151.0 +3.54 -0.13 1.093 51.7% -108 -141 +173 61.2% +0.76 10–6 (63%) 15–13 (54%) — -1.53 1998 1875 153.3 +3.32 +3.75 1.200 52.8% +18 -54 -154 58.3% +0.79 12–7 (63%) 6–7 (46%) — -3.20
32 2010 1866 115.9 -0.81 -0.45 0.960 49.6% -85 — — 45.5% -0.05 1–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.43 1999 1801 139.9 +1.18 -0.49 1.035 50.3% +85 -46 — 51.0% +0.04 11–7 (61%) 5–9 (36%) — -0.76
33 2011 1772 128.1 -0.01 -0.99 0.941 48.9% +11 — +215 45.1% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 8–6 (57%) — +1.11 2000 1719 125.4 +0.22 -0.31 1.004 49.9% +111 +38 -59 55.8% +0.16 4–6 (40%) 6–4 (60%) — +1.36
34 2012 1975 163.7 +4.25 +2.56 1.182 52.7% -70 -48 +106 61.9% +0.71 7–7 (50%) 11–5 (69%) — -1.93 2001 1695 134.2 -1.00 +1.31 0.973 49.5% +89 +43 -79 48.4% -0.09 8–6 (57%) 8–4 (67%) — -0.41
35 2013 2024 167.7 +3.58 +2.30 1.133 52.1% -25 +9 +118 65.3% +0.87 13–8 (62%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 1911 147.8 +1.08 +0.76 1.066 51.1% +26 +47 — 58.8% +0.77 7–2 (78%) 5–2 (71%) — +1.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 1788 121.7 -0.85 -1.47 0.835 47.3% +57 — +212 32.3% -1.23 0–3 (0%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 1689 129.1 -1.47 -2.29 0.859 47.7% +75 +108 +206 36.0% -0.80 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2117 158.2 +2.62 +1.22 1.087 51.5% +10 -44 +3 59.5% +0.62 170–105 (62%) 198–152 (57%) 109.2 -0.69 — 2014 152.4 +0.85 +3.03 1.105 51.7% -4 +23 -128 57.1% +0.52 127–86 (60%) 103–100 (51%) 102.0 -1.50

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.