H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Marc Rosset H2H: 2-3

Marc Rosset holds a 3–2 lead over Tommy Haas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2002 Tashkent third round 4-6 7-6(2) 6-3.

GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
SUI Age 55 Right-Handed 201 cm / 6'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 12, 2002* Tashkent ATP 250 R32 Hard Tommy Haas #2 4-6 7-6(2) 6-3 Marc Rosset #95 Match data
Jul 2, 2000* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Marc Rosset #33 6-4 3-6 6-3 3-6 9-7 Tommy Haas #23 Match data
May 26, 1999* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Tommy Haas #19 7-6(6) 7-6(4) 6-1 Marc Rosset #29 Match data
Oct 8, 1998* Basel ATP 250 R32 Hard Marc Rosset #49 7-6(3) 4-6 7-6(4) Tommy Haas #37 Match data
Apr 30, 1998* Munich ATP 250 R32 Clay Marc Rosset #28 6-3 6-7(2) 6-4 Tommy Haas #33 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15
Marc Rosset #1,490 #9 2,069 1,950 398 334 54.4% 0 0 0 0 14 14

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Marc Rosset
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1988 0–1 0.0% #474 1,488 0 0
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0 1989 7–2 77.8% #45 1,613 0 1
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0 1990 35–23 60.3% #22 1,811 0 2
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0 1991 18–28 39.1% #60 1,648 0 2
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1 1992 31–22 58.5% #35 1,826 0 3
22 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1 1993 46–21 68.7% #16 1,922 0 6
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5 1994 46–27 63.0% #14 1,925 0 8
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5 1995 38–21 64.4% #15 1,814 0 10
25 1996 31–27 53.4% #22 1,771 0 10
26 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7 1997 32–31 50.8% #31 1,630 0 11
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7 1998 27–27 50.0% #31 1,749 0 11
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10 1999 26–27 49.1% #45 1,658 0 12
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11 2000 31–25 55.4% #28 1,723 0 14
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11 2001 12–23 34.3% #119 1,601 0 14
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12 2002 8–12 40.0% #101 1,597 0 14
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12 2003 6–9 40.0% #122 1,586 0 14
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12 2004 4–8 33.3% #214 1,546 0 14
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13
35 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15