H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Marc Rosset H2H: 2-3

Marc Rosset holds a 3–2 lead over Tommy Haas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2002 Tashkent round of 32 4-6 7-6(2) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Marc Rosset
SUI Age 55 Right-Handed 201 cm / 6'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tommy Haas #2 4-6 7-6(2) 6-3 Marc Rosset #95 Match data Sep 12, 2002* R32 Tashkent ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Marc Rosset #33 6-4 3-6 6-3 3-6 9-7 Tommy Haas #23 Match data Jul 2, 2000* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Tommy Haas #19 7-6(6) 7-6(4) 6-1 Marc Rosset #29 Match data May 26, 1999* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Marc Rosset #49 7-6(3) 4-6 7-6(4) Tommy Haas #37 Match data Oct 8, 1998* R32 Swiss Indoors ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Marc Rosset #28 6-3 6-7(2) 6-4 Tommy Haas #33 Match data Apr 30, 1998* R32 Munich Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,116 540 333 61.9% 0 0 1 0 4 10 15
Marc Rosset #1,490 #9 2,069 1,956 406 335 54.8% 0 1 0 0 2 12 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Marc Rosset
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1988 0–1 0.0% #474 1,488 0 0
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,588 0 0 1989 7–2 77.8% #45 1,613 0 1
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,722 0 0 1990 35–23 60.3% #22 1,812 0 2
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,820 0 0 1991 18–28 39.1% #60 1,649 0 2
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,833 0 1 1992 37–22 62.7% #35 1,879 0 4
22 2000 32–21 60.4% #23 1,813 0 1 1993 46–21 68.7% #16 1,942 0 7
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,011 0 5 1994 46–27 63.0% #14 1,931 0 9
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,863 0 5 1995 38–21 64.4% #15 1,814 0 11
25 — — — — — — — 1996 33–28 54.1% #22 1,784 0 11
26 2004 36–19 65.5% #17 1,916 0 7 1997 32–31 50.8% #31 1,630 0 12
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,767 0 7 1998 27–27 50.0% #31 1,745 0 12
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,892 0 10 1999 26–27 49.1% #45 1,658 0 13
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,894 0 11 2000 31–25 55.4% #28 1,733 0 15
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,857 0 11 2001 12–23 34.3% #119 1,603 0 15
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,940 0 12 2002 8–12 40.0% #101 1,598 0 15
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,865 0 12 2003 6–9 40.0% #122 1,587 0 15
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,771 0 12 2004 4–8 33.3% #214 1,547 0 15
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,975 0 13 — — — — — — —
35 2013 47–24 66.2% #12 2,024 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,911 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,788 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,689 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tommy Haas Marc Rosset
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1996 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 7 1 8 87.5% — — — — — — — —
19 1997 10 8 18 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1990 1 6 7 14.3% 22 11 33 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4%
20 1998 18 15 33 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1991 10 9 19 52.6% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
21 1999 25 12 37 67.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1992 15 12 27 55.6% 14 7 21 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0%
22 2000 18 9 27 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1993 20 8 28 71.4% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 19 5 24 79.2%
23 2001 41 12 53 77.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 1994 21 14 35 60.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 18 4 22 81.8%
24 2002 25 14 39 64.1% 17 7 24 70.8% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 11 9 20 55.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 7 10 17 41.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 9 24 62.5%
26 2004 24 11 35 68.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 17 12 29 58.6% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 8 10 20.0%
27 2005 15 12 27 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1998 13 13 26 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 6 18 66.7%
28 2006 34 10 44 77.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 1999 13 11 24 54.2% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
29 2007 31 13 44 70.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2000 16 12 28 57.1% 6 8 14 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4%
30 2008 15 11 26 57.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2001 5 9 14 35.7% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
31 2009 15 14 29 51.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — — 2002 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
32 2010 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
33 2011 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2004 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
34 2012 16 12 28 57.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 28 15 43 65.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 7 6 13 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 0 3 3 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 335 197 532 63.0% 117 82 199 58.8% 57 34 91 62.6% 31 20 51 60.8% — 154 134 288 53.5% 112 102 214 52.3% 26 31 57 45.6% 114 68 182 62.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 805/873 of Tommy Haas's and 592/673 of Marc Rosset's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tommy Haas Marc Rosset
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1996 7/7 3.7 3.9 53.5% 70.9% 59.6% 71.3% 67.6% 65.3% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 36/39 5.5 3.8 59.8% 71.0% 49.5% 55.1% 44.9% 62.5% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 51/60 4.9 4.1 58.9% 71.1% 48.0% 55.1% 44.2% 61.3% 39.1% 1991 45/46 7.8 3.6 54.9% 77.0% 46.8% 53.3% 32.5% 63.3% 36.3%
21 1999 54/68 8.4 5.6 53.0% 76.3% 50.6% 62.2% 43.2% 64.2% 35.9% 1992 48/59 8.9 3.8 57.4% 77.3% 50.4% 57.4% 42.5% 66.0% 36.5%
22 2000 39/53 7.0 4.4 54.3% 74.2% 51.0% 59.5% 43.0% 63.5% 35.9% 1993 62/67 9.9 3.6 58.7% 79.4% 50.7% 65.4% 39.9% 67.5% 38.7%
23 2001 62/74 7.7 3.9 56.4% 76.7% 52.4% 64.4% 42.5% 66.0% 39.7% 1994 66/73 10.0 5.1 57.1% 79.2% 48.8% 64.6% 40.2% 66.3% 38.4%
24 2002 58/65 8.8 4.8 56.0% 75.4% 52.7% 61.9% 39.6% 65.5% 37.1% 1995 50/59 9.3 4.8 55.3% 79.3% 50.6% 63.9% 41.2% 66.6% 37.1%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 48/61 10.9 4.6 58.8% 80.6% 48.5% 63.0% 45.0% 67.5% 35.7%
26 2004 53/55 5.9 3.4 57.9% 75.9% 52.0% 57.3% 46.4% 65.7% 39.2% 1997 54/63 7.7 5.8 55.4% 76.0% 45.8% 57.7% 38.9% 62.7% 37.2%
27 2005 49/49 6.7 3.6 57.8% 74.3% 52.7% 52.9% 43.6% 65.2% 37.8% 1998 48/54 9.6 6.4 54.6% 79.0% 46.3% 50.1% 31.9% 64.3% 35.9%
28 2006 67/67 7.1 3.2 61.0% 76.4% 54.5% 60.1% 40.2% 67.9% 38.3% 1999 47/53 9.9 6.9 53.7% 79.4% 46.8% 63.0% 41.5% 64.5% 36.4%
29 2007 52/53 8.0 3.0 60.6% 78.1% 55.6% 61.9% 43.3% 69.0% 38.7% 2000 49/56 10.0 6.2 57.6% 77.0% 47.8% 55.6% 39.3% 64.3% 36.5%
30 2008 32/33 7.3 3.8 59.4% 72.6% 52.0% 62.8% 40.9% 64.3% 38.1% 2001 30/35 9.4 7.5 56.2% 74.8% 42.5% 60.1% 40.5% 60.7% 32.0%
31 2009 48/49 9.1 4.9 60.2% 77.6% 53.0% 65.4% 44.8% 67.7% 35.3% 2002 18/20 13.6 7.3 57.8% 78.0% 49.5% 63.8% 40.4% 66.0% 32.4%
32 2010 7/7 9.9 4.6 60.9% 72.3% 50.5% 65.2% 38.4% 63.4% 35.1% 2003 15/15 10.3 7.7 56.3% 76.6% 46.2% 64.8% 45.0% 63.4% 33.4%
33 2011 19/19 7.8 4.3 59.9% 70.7% 51.7% 60.5% 43.6% 62.9% 34.9% 2004 12/12 9.2 4.6 58.6% 76.7% 45.3% 51.6% 37.4% 64.2% 31.7%
34 2012 47/48 6.2 3.4 59.6% 75.7% 53.9% 65.6% 43.9% 66.9% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 68/71 6.1 3.3 61.3% 74.8% 54.0% 63.0% 41.1% 66.6% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 25/25 4.6 2.0 63.7% 72.2% 53.8% 56.5% 49.5% 65.3% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 11/11 4.0 4.7 62.5% 70.1% 50.4% 52.3% 31.9% 62.8% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 20/20 4.8 4.1 61.9% 68.9% 54.0% 61.4% 29.9% 63.1% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 805/873 6.9 3.9 58.7% 74.7% 52.5% 60.6% 42.7% 65.5% 37.5% — 592/741 9.6 5.3 56.5% 78.2% 48.0% 59.9% 39.6% 65.1% 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tommy Haas Marc Rosset
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1489 101.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.04
18 1996 1588 144.9 +0.04 +2.74 1.057 51.8% +30 — — 58.8% +0.77 0–1 2–0 — -0.78 1989 1614 132.6 — — — — — +46 — 73.7% +2.00 1–0 — — +0.48
19 1997 1723 139.6 +1.11 +0.51 1.027 50.7% -2 -80 -102 54.9% +0.37 9–8 (53%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.37 1990 1812 141.5 — — — — -150 -4 -202 54.4% +0.13 18–6 (75%) 17–7 (71%) — +0.66
20 1998 1821 150.9 +0.55 +1.94 1.010 50.5% -13 -133 -149 51.4% +0.19 10–6 (63%) 10–9 (53%) — -2.69 1991 1649 138.9 +2.30 -1.77 0.989 49.4% +23 +47 — 45.5% -0.40 3–12 (20%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.07
21 1999 1833 148.8 +1.86 -1.09 1.003 50.2% +21 -62 -115 60.7% +0.62 13–7 (65%) 20–19 (51%) — +0.33 1992 1880 156.4 +3.97 -0.48 1.074 51.0% -52 -9 -248 59.7% +0.63 13–9 (59%) 15–9 (63%) — -4.83
22 2000 1814 145.1 +1.31 -0.68 0.983 49.9% +30 -33 -96 53.0% +0.31 14–3 (82%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.61 1993 1942 153.8 +5.65 +0.59 1.191 52.8% +30 -111 — 65.8% +0.89 13–7 (65%) 16–12 (57%) — -0.51
23 2001 2012 160.6 +4.03 +2.88 1.170 52.7% +26 -246 -364 67.6% +1.30 17–3 (85%) 13–18 (42%) — -1.10 1994 1931 148.4 +4.31 +0.54 1.138 51.9% +40 -202 -306 59.7% +0.31 13–10 (57%) 26–12 (68%) — -0.29
24 2002 1863 149.4 +3.04 +0.31 1.074 51.4% +35 +17 — 62.0% +0.66 19–7 (73%) 17–11 (61%) — +1.60 1995 1815 145.3 +3.76 -0.37 1.111 51.7% +19 +11 -111 60.8% +0.67 10–7 (59%) 18–15 (55%) — +1.03
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1784 147.2 +4.82 -1.13 1.097 51.5% +4 +62 -40 55.5% +0.36 12–13 (48%) 14–14 (50%) — +0.64
26 2004 1917 153.9 +3.05 +2.94 1.143 52.4% +36 -67 -248 60.3% +0.68 10–5 (67%) 9–10 (47%) — -2.50 1997 1631 133.6 +1.06 -0.88 0.997 49.8% +7 +208 +88 51.3% +0.01 12–8 (60%) 14–15 (48%) — +1.44
27 2005 1767 138.3 +1.76 +0.90 1.088 51.1% +34 +44 -63 58.6% +0.48 4–8 (33%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.64 1998 1745 145.3 +1.96 -0.58 1.005 49.5% +36 -39 -45 50.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 13–11 (54%) — -1.59
28 2006 1892 153.4 +4.99 +1.83 1.194 52.7% +57 -145 -124 69.5% +1.12 13–8 (62%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.81 1999 1658 138.7 +2.15 -0.73 1.026 50.4% +83 -45 -24 49.6% +0.20 8–8 (50%) 8–15 (35%) — +1.75
29 2007 1894 152.7 +4.56 +2.83 1.249 53.6% +31 -196 -35 65.2% +1.02 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) — +2.11 2000 1733 140.8 +2.25 -0.56 1.023 50.0% +41 -77 -59 57.2% +0.28 10–9 (53%) 10–14 (42%) — +0.28
30 2008 1858 140.5 +1.47 +1.79 1.068 51.1% +30 — +20 54.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.96 2001 1604 126.4 -1.32 -4.04 0.816 46.8% +95 -7 -35 33.7% -0.93 6–4 (60%) 8–8 (50%) — -0.48
31 2009 1941 151.0 +3.54 -0.13 1.093 51.7% -108 -141 +173 61.2% +0.76 10–6 (63%) 15–13 (54%) — -1.53 2002 1599 127.6 +2.47 -3.30 0.951 49.2% +56 +4 -18 46.9% -0.39 2–4 (33%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.72
32 2010 1866 115.9 -0.81 -0.45 0.960 49.6% -85 — — 45.5% -0.05 1–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.43 2003 1587 123.1 +1.30 -1.92 0.911 48.7% +50 — -17 40.0% -0.77 0–1 7–3 (70%) — -0.48
33 2011 1772 128.1 -0.01 -0.99 0.941 48.9% +11 — +215 45.1% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 8–6 (57%) — +1.11 2004 1548 116.7 +0.60 -3.15 0.886 47.7% +75 +9 — 40.7% -0.67 0–3 (0%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.43
34 2012 1975 163.7 +4.25 +2.56 1.182 52.7% -70 -48 +106 61.9% +0.71 7–7 (50%) 11–5 (69%) — -1.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 2024 167.7 +3.58 +2.30 1.133 52.1% -25 +9 +118 65.3% +0.87 13–8 (62%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 1911 147.8 +1.08 +0.76 1.066 51.1% +26 +47 — 58.8% +0.77 7–2 (78%) 5–2 (71%) — +1.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 1788 121.7 -0.85 -1.47 0.835 47.3% +57 — +212 32.3% -1.23 0–3 (0%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 1689 129.1 -1.47 -2.29 0.859 47.7% +75 +108 +206 36.0% -0.80 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2117 158.2 +2.62 +1.22 1.087 51.5% +10 -44 +3 59.5% +0.62 170–105 (62%) 198–152 (57%) 109.2 -0.69 — 1956 148.8 +2.94 -0.82 1.042 50.5% +22 +2 -83 54.3% +0.21 129–108 (54%) 183–150 (55%) 105.7 -0.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.