H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 1-1

Tommy Haas and Marcos Baghdatis are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marcos Baghdatis leads 1–0 on carpet, while Tommy Haas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2012 Munich quarterfinal 6-1 7-6(3).

GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 1
2 main draw meetings
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 5, 2012* Munich ATP 250 QF Clay Tommy Haas #134 6-1 7-6(3) Marcos Baghdatis #39 Match data
Oct 28, 2005* Basel ATP 250 R16 Carpet Marcos Baghdatis #85 6-2 6-3 Tommy Haas #41 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 324 272 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Marcos Baghdatis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #159 1,559 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,694 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1
22 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,937 0 2
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,815 0 2
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,810 0 3
25 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,852 0 4
26 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7 2012 31–24 56.4% #36 1,897 0 4
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,804 0 4
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,703 0 4
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,869 0 4
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,723 0 4
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,740 0 4
35 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15