H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Marcos Ondruska H2H: 1-0

Tommy Haas holds a 1–0 lead over Marcos Ondruska in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tommy Haas leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 1998 Canadian Open round of 64 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Marcos Ondruska
RSA Age 53 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tommy Haas #41 6-2 6-3 Marcos Ondruska #107 Match data Aug 5, 1998* R64 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,116 540 333 61.9% 0 1 0 4 10 15
Marcos Ondruska #1,352 #27 1,007 1,786 106 138 43.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Marcos Ondruska
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1990 3–3 50.0% #256 1,537 0 0
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,588 0 0 1991 3–5 37.5% #137 1,589 0 0
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,722 0 0 1992 11–10 52.4% #67 1,640 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,820 0 0 1993 26–29 47.3% #47 1,568 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,833 0 1 1994 15–17 46.9% #98 1,686 0 0
22 2000 32–21 60.4% #23 1,813 0 1 1995 16–19 45.7% #114 1,665 0 0
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,011 0 5 1996 17–20 45.9% #102 1,675 0 0
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,863 0 5 1997 12–16 42.9% #113 1,656 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 1998 2–10 16.7% #142 1,541 0 0
26 2004 36–19 65.5% #17 1,916 0 7 1999 0–2 0.0% #159 1,520 0 0
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,767 0 7 2000 0–5 0.0% #204 1,477 0 0
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,892 0 10 2001 1–2 33.3% #263 1,569 0 0
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,894 0 11 — — — — — — —
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,857 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,940 0 12 — — — — — — —
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,865 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,771 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,975 0 13 — — — — — — —
35 2013 47–24 66.2% #12 2,024 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,911 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,788 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,689 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tommy Haas Marcos Ondruska
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1996 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1997 10 8 18 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1992 7 7 14 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
20 1998 18 15 33 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1993 12 11 23 52.2% 10 11 21 47.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0%
21 1999 25 12 37 67.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1994 11 9 20 55.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2000 18 9 27 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1995 11 12 23 47.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2001 41 12 53 77.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 1996 13 13 26 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2002 25 14 39 64.1% 17 7 24 70.8% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 6 10 16 37.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 2 7 9 22.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2004 24 11 35 68.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2005 15 12 27 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2000 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2006 34 10 44 77.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2007 31 13 44 70.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 15 11 26 57.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 15 14 29 51.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 16 12 28 57.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 28 15 43 65.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 7 6 13 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 0 3 3 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 335 197 532 63.0% 117 82 199 58.8% 57 34 91 62.6% 31 20 51 60.8% — 66 81 147 44.9% 25 30 55 45.5% 11 16 27 40.7% 4 11 15 26.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 805/873 of Tommy Haas's and 206/238 of Marcos Ondruska's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tommy Haas Marcos Ondruska
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1996 7/7 3.7 3.9 53.5% 70.9% 59.6% 71.3% 67.6% 65.3% 36.7% 1991 6/8 0.8 1.2 60.4% 61.6% 45.5% 53.7% 54.4% 53.8% 38.1%
19 1997 36/39 5.5 3.8 59.8% 71.0% 49.5% 55.1% 44.9% 62.5% 38.5% 1992 18/21 1.6 2.1 63.0% 62.9% 49.3% 50.1% 45.0% 57.6% 45.0%
20 1998 51/60 4.9 4.1 58.9% 71.1% 48.0% 55.1% 44.2% 61.3% 39.1% 1993 52/55 2.1 3.6 58.9% 64.5% 48.0% 56.6% 45.3% 57.6% 41.2%
21 1999 54/68 8.4 5.6 53.0% 76.3% 50.6% 62.2% 43.2% 64.2% 35.9% 1994 28/32 2.9 3.9 55.5% 68.3% 46.4% 53.4% 52.7% 58.4% 41.4%
22 2000 39/53 7.0 4.4 54.3% 74.2% 51.0% 59.5% 43.0% 63.5% 35.9% 1995 35/35 3.6 3.8 55.6% 69.3% 45.9% 59.4% 50.1% 59.1% 39.7%
23 2001 62/74 7.7 3.9 56.4% 76.7% 52.4% 64.4% 42.5% 66.0% 39.7% 1996 28/37 3.4 2.9 60.1% 67.6% 48.4% 47.7% 41.6% 59.6% 39.7%
24 2002 58/65 8.8 4.8 56.0% 75.4% 52.7% 61.9% 39.6% 65.5% 37.1% 1997 24/28 3.5 4.5 56.5% 66.3% 44.2% 53.2% 41.3% 56.8% 36.8%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 8/12 3.0 3.4 59.1% 63.2% 40.3% 66.6% 47.6% 53.8% 34.1%
26 2004 53/55 5.9 3.4 57.9% 75.9% 52.0% 57.3% 46.4% 65.7% 39.2% 1999 2/2 1.5 6.5 59.5% 59.5% 38.3% 55.0% 21.4% 51.9% 34.5%
27 2005 49/49 6.7 3.6 57.8% 74.3% 52.7% 52.9% 43.6% 65.2% 37.8% 2000 3/5 4.0 5.7 59.6% 66.5% 39.8% 49.2% 20.0% 56.0% 31.2%
28 2006 67/67 7.1 3.2 61.0% 76.4% 54.5% 60.1% 40.2% 67.9% 38.3% 2001 2/3 4.0 8.0 58.1% 67.0% 49.1% 53.5% 35.8% 59.5% 36.8%
29 2007 52/53 8.0 3.0 60.6% 78.1% 55.6% 61.9% 43.3% 69.0% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 32/33 7.3 3.8 59.4% 72.6% 52.0% 62.8% 40.9% 64.3% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 48/49 9.1 4.9 60.2% 77.6% 53.0% 65.4% 44.8% 67.7% 35.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 7/7 9.9 4.6 60.9% 72.3% 50.5% 65.2% 38.4% 63.4% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 19/19 7.8 4.3 59.9% 70.7% 51.7% 60.5% 43.6% 62.9% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 47/48 6.2 3.4 59.6% 75.7% 53.9% 65.6% 43.9% 66.9% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 68/71 6.1 3.3 61.3% 74.8% 54.0% 63.0% 41.1% 66.6% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 25/25 4.6 2.0 63.7% 72.2% 53.8% 56.5% 49.5% 65.3% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 11/11 4.0 4.7 62.5% 70.1% 50.4% 52.3% 31.9% 62.8% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 20/20 4.8 4.1 61.9% 68.9% 54.0% 61.4% 29.9% 63.1% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 805/873 6.9 3.9 58.7% 74.7% 52.5% 60.6% 42.7% 65.5% 37.5% — 206/244 2.8 3.6 58.2% 66.2% 46.6% 54.6% 45.8% 57.8% 40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tommy Haas Marcos Ondruska
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1537 111.9 — — — — +45 — — 41.7% -1.25 1–1 1–0 — +0.20
18 1996 1588 144.9 +0.04 +2.74 1.057 51.8% +30 — — 58.8% +0.77 0–1 2–0 — -0.78 1991 1589 127.8 -3.07 +0.45 0.825 46.5% -15 +24 — 40.0% -0.60 1–1 0–1 — -0.46
19 1997 1723 139.6 +1.11 +0.51 1.027 50.7% -2 -80 -102 54.9% +0.37 9–8 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 105.9 +0.37 1992 1641 118.5 -2.04 +3.41 1.062 51.0% -37 +25 — 50.0% +0.14 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 102.8 +1.64
20 1998 1821 150.9 +0.55 +1.94 1.010 50.5% -13 -133 -149 51.4% +0.19 10–6 (63%) 10–9 (53%) 107.9 -2.69 1993 1568 136.6 -2.53 +2.02 0.972 49.6% +55 +92 +20 49.3% -0.07 7–11 (39%) 5–5 (50%) 96.4 +1.65
21 1999 1833 148.8 +1.86 -1.09 1.003 50.2% +21 -62 -115 60.7% +0.62 13–7 (65%) 20–19 (51%) 104.0 +0.33 1994 1687 133.1 -1.29 +1.94 0.994 50.0% -8 -54 -101 51.1% +0.02 6–10 (38%) 6–5 (55%) 97.5 -0.64
22 2000 1814 145.1 +1.31 -0.68 0.983 49.9% +30 -33 -96 53.0% +0.31 14–3 (82%) 9–10 (47%) 107.0 -0.61 1995 1666 131.0 -2.18 +1.47 0.970 49.6% +20 -47 -65 46.9% -0.02 8–7 (53%) 4–9 (31%) 98.1 -0.51
23 2001 2012 160.6 +4.03 +2.88 1.170 52.7% +26 -246 -364 67.6% +1.30 17–3 (85%) 13–18 (42%) 104.3 -1.10 1996 1675 135.7 -1.48 +1.63 0.982 49.3% +38 -128 -51 45.8% -0.15 5–5 (50%) 7–8 (47%) 97.4 -1.02
24 2002 1863 149.4 +3.04 +0.31 1.074 51.4% +35 +17 — 62.0% +0.66 19–7 (73%) 17–11 (61%) 108.9 +1.60 1997 1656 124.4 -3.01 -0.51 0.853 47.2% +1 -41 -28 38.0% -0.69 7–2 (78%) 4–7 (36%) 106.2 -0.01
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1541 113.3 -3.51 -1.85 0.737 44.6% +23 — — 23.3% -1.53 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 96.2 +0.28
26 2004 1917 153.9 +3.05 +2.94 1.143 52.4% +36 -67 -248 60.3% +0.68 10–5 (67%) 9–10 (47%) 103.2 -2.50 1999 1520 102.7 -1.06 +2.09 0.716 43.6% — — — 0.0% -2.80 — — — -0.12
27 2005 1767 138.3 +1.76 +0.90 1.088 51.1% +34 +44 -63 58.6% +0.48 4–8 (33%) 14–5 (74%) 97.9 +0.64 2000 1477 113.2 -2.58 +2.02 0.709 43.5% +31 — — 16.7% -2.50 0–2 2–1 (67%) — -0.49
28 2006 1892 153.4 +4.99 +1.83 1.194 52.7% +57 -145 -124 69.5% +1.12 13–8 (62%) 17–10 (63%) 102.2 +0.81 2001 1569 114.2 -1.90 +4.79 0.909 48.2% — — — 33.3% -1.83 1–0 1–1 — -0.37
29 2007 1894 152.7 +4.56 +2.83 1.249 53.6% +31 -196 -35 65.2% +1.02 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) 100.3 +2.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 1858 140.5 +1.47 +1.79 1.068 51.1% +30 — +20 54.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–7 (46%) 97.2 -0.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 1941 151.0 +3.54 -0.13 1.093 51.7% -108 -141 +173 61.2% +0.76 10–6 (63%) 15–13 (54%) 105.4 -1.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 1866 115.9 -0.81 -0.45 0.960 49.6% -85 — — 45.5% -0.05 1–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 1772 128.1 -0.01 -0.99 0.941 48.9% +11 — +215 45.1% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 8–6 (57%) 96.4 +1.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 1975 163.7 +4.25 +2.56 1.182 52.7% -70 -48 +106 61.9% +0.71 7–7 (50%) 11–5 (69%) 106.0 -1.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 2024 167.7 +3.58 +2.30 1.133 52.1% -25 +9 +118 65.3% +0.87 13–8 (62%) 16–10 (62%) 104.9 -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 1911 147.8 +1.08 +0.76 1.066 51.1% +26 +47 — 58.8% +0.77 7–2 (78%) 5–2 (71%) 107.1 +1.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 1788 121.7 -0.85 -1.47 0.835 47.3% +57 — +212 32.3% -1.23 0–3 (0%) 4–3 (57%) 96.1 -0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 1689 129.1 -1.47 -2.29 0.859 47.7% +75 +108 +206 36.0% -0.80 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 99.8 -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2117 158.2 +2.62 +1.22 1.087 51.5% +10 -44 +3 59.5% +0.62 170–105 (62%) 198–152 (57%) 109.2 -0.69 — 1786 135.2 -2.21 +1.52 0.947 49.0% +19 +16 -37 44.4% -0.33 41–43 (49%) 33–44 (43%) 97.0 +0.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.