H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Mardy Fish H2H: 4-1

Tommy Haas holds a 4–1 lead over Mardy Fish in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 4–0 on hard courts, while Mardy Fish leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2012 Washington semifinal 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Mardy Fish
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 4, 2012* Washington ATP 500 SF Hard Tommy Haas #36 6-3 7-5 Mardy Fish #15 Match data
Feb 24, 2007* Memphis ATP 250 SF Hard Tommy Haas #9 6-3 6-4 Mardy Fish #25 Match data
Apr 15, 2006* Houston ATP 250 SF Clay Mardy Fish #212 4-1 (ret.) Tommy Haas #27 Match data
Mar 23, 2005* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tommy Haas #17 7-6(6) 7-5 Mardy Fish #54 Match data
Mar 22, 2000* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tommy Haas #21 6-2 6-1 Mardy Fish Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15
Mardy Fish #619 #7 3,060 2,114 290 211 57.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Mardy Fish
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0 2000 3–4 42.9% #305 1,524 0 0
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0 2001 5–8 38.5% #141 1,542 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0 2002 11–11 50.0% #84 1,630 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1 2003 38–23 62.3% #20 1,841 0 1
22 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1 2004 21–17 55.3% #37 1,728 0 1
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5 2005 6–11 35.3% #225 1,625 0 1
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5 2006 23–18 56.1% #47 1,729 0 2
25 — — — — — — — 2007 24–21 53.3% #39 1,756 0 2
26 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7 2008 32–23 58.2% #24 1,854 0 2
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7 2009 21–17 55.3% #55 1,789 0 3
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10 2010 38–15 71.7% #16 2,009 0 5
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11 2011 42–22 65.6% #8 2,012 0 6
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11 2012 20–12 62.5% #27 2,008 0 6
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12 2013 4–5 44.4% #373 1,932 0 6
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12 2015 2–4 33.3% #423 1,882 0 6
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13 — — — — — — —
35 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15 — — — — — — —