H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Mardy Fish H2H: 4-1

Tommy Haas holds a 4–1 lead over Mardy Fish in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 4–0 on hard courts, while Mardy Fish leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2012 Washington Open semifinal 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Mardy Fish
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tommy Haas #36 6-3 7-5 Mardy Fish #15 Match data Aug 4, 2012* SF Washington Open ATP 500 Hard
Tommy Haas #9 6-3 6-4 Mardy Fish #25 Match data Feb 24, 2007* SF Memphis International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Mardy Fish #212 4-1 (ret.) Tommy Haas #27 Match data Apr 15, 2006* SF U.S. Men's Clay Court Championship ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Tommy Haas #17 7-6(6) 7-5 Mardy Fish #54 Match data Mar 23, 2005* R64 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Tommy Haas #21 6-2 6-1 Mardy Fish Match data Mar 22, 2000* R64 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,116 540 333 61.9% 0 1 0 4 10 15
Mardy Fish #619 #7 3,060 2,116 295 212 58.2% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Mardy Fish
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,588 0 0 2000 3–4 42.9% #305 1,524 0 0
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,722 0 0 2001 5–8 38.5% #141 1,542 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,820 0 0 2002 11–11 50.0% #84 1,630 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,833 0 1 2003 38–23 62.3% #20 1,841 0 1
22 2000 32–21 60.4% #23 1,813 0 1 2004 26–18 59.1% #37 1,760 0 1
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,011 0 5 2005 6–11 35.3% #225 1,640 0 1
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,863 0 5 2006 23–18 56.1% #47 1,726 0 2
25 — — — — — — — 2007 24–21 53.3% #39 1,755 0 2
26 2004 36–19 65.5% #17 1,916 0 7 2008 32–23 58.2% #24 1,860 0 2
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,767 0 7 2009 21–17 55.3% #55 1,815 0 3
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,892 0 10 2010 38–15 71.7% #16 2,023 0 5
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,894 0 11 2011 42–22 65.6% #8 2,012 0 6
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,857 0 11 2012 20–12 62.5% #27 2,012 0 6
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,940 0 12 2013 4–5 44.4% #373 1,935 0 6
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,865 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,771 0 12 2015 2–4 33.3% #423 1,885 0 6
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,975 0 13 — — — — — — —
35 2013 47–24 66.2% #12 2,024 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,911 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,788 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,689 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tommy Haas Mardy Fish
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1996 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
19 1997 10 8 18 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2001 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
20 1998 18 15 33 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2002 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
21 1999 25 12 37 67.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2003 29 12 41 70.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2000 18 9 27 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2004 19 13 32 59.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 2001 41 12 53 77.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 2005 6 9 15 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2002 25 14 39 64.1% 17 7 24 70.8% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 12 14 26 46.2% 5 0 5 100.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 22 14 36 61.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2004 24 11 35 68.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 26 15 41 63.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
27 2005 15 12 27 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2009 13 10 23 56.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
28 2006 34 10 44 77.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 2010 25 11 36 69.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — —
29 2007 31 13 44 70.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2011 33 17 50 66.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
30 2008 15 11 26 57.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2012 17 10 27 63.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
31 2009 15 14 29 51.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — — 2013 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2015 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 16 12 28 57.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 28 15 43 65.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 7 6 13 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 0 3 3 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 335 197 532 63.0% 117 82 199 58.8% 57 34 91 62.6% 31 20 51 60.8% — 221 151 372 59.4% 24 29 53 45.3% 46 26 72 63.9% 4 6 10 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 805/873 of Tommy Haas's and 452/465 of Mardy Fish's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tommy Haas Mardy Fish
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1996 7/7 3.7 3.9 53.5% 70.9% 59.6% 71.3% 67.6% 65.3% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 36/39 5.5 3.8 59.8% 71.0% 49.5% 55.1% 44.9% 62.5% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 51/60 4.9 4.1 58.9% 71.1% 48.0% 55.1% 44.2% 61.3% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1999 54/68 8.4 5.6 53.0% 76.3% 50.6% 62.2% 43.2% 64.2% 35.9% 2003 58/61 11.0 3.9 53.4% 80.0% 52.0% 64.2% 39.2% 67.0% 35.1%
22 2000 39/53 7.0 4.4 54.3% 74.2% 51.0% 59.5% 43.0% 63.5% 35.9% 2004 38/44 11.1 4.1 55.1% 77.2% 50.8% 65.1% 42.1% 65.4% 35.2%
23 2001 62/74 7.7 3.9 56.4% 76.7% 52.4% 64.4% 42.5% 66.0% 39.7% 2005 17/17 10.3 3.4 53.9% 72.8% 46.5% 53.7% 34.0% 60.9% 34.2%
24 2002 58/65 8.8 4.8 56.0% 75.4% 52.7% 61.9% 39.6% 65.5% 37.1% 2006 40/41 9.5 3.1 51.8% 78.8% 53.9% 68.1% 43.9% 66.5% 37.5%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 45/45 11.4 2.7 52.2% 80.1% 52.1% 55.7% 42.6% 66.5% 35.7%
26 2004 53/55 5.9 3.4 57.9% 75.9% 52.0% 57.3% 46.4% 65.7% 39.2% 2008 55/55 10.1 2.7 49.3% 77.9% 51.8% 57.6% 39.2% 64.6% 36.6%
27 2005 49/49 6.7 3.6 57.8% 74.3% 52.7% 52.9% 43.6% 65.2% 37.8% 2009 37/38 11.0 2.3 56.9% 77.1% 53.3% 58.2% 44.0% 66.6% 36.9%
28 2006 67/67 7.1 3.2 61.0% 76.4% 54.5% 60.1% 40.2% 67.9% 38.3% 2010 52/53 10.9 2.3 55.3% 79.7% 54.6% 62.1% 49.8% 68.5% 38.1%
29 2007 52/53 8.0 3.0 60.6% 78.1% 55.6% 61.9% 43.3% 69.0% 38.7% 2011 64/64 7.6 1.7 58.4% 76.7% 55.4% 64.9% 44.7% 67.7% 39.4%
30 2008 32/33 7.3 3.8 59.4% 72.6% 52.0% 62.8% 40.9% 64.3% 38.1% 2012 31/32 9.7 2.5 52.2% 77.9% 55.4% 68.6% 51.3% 67.1% 39.8%
31 2009 48/49 9.1 4.9 60.2% 77.6% 53.0% 65.4% 44.8% 67.7% 35.3% 2013 9/9 5.8 3.1 49.6% 75.7% 47.6% 45.0% 44.4% 61.2% 37.2%
32 2010 7/7 9.9 4.6 60.9% 72.3% 50.5% 65.2% 38.4% 63.4% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 19/19 7.8 4.3 59.9% 70.7% 51.7% 60.5% 43.6% 62.9% 34.9% 2015 6/6 8.3 3.8 52.2% 75.4% 46.3% 54.9% 43.2% 61.5% 40.9%
34 2012 47/48 6.2 3.4 59.6% 75.7% 53.9% 65.6% 43.9% 66.9% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 68/71 6.1 3.3 61.3% 74.8% 54.0% 63.0% 41.1% 66.6% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 25/25 4.6 2.0 63.7% 72.2% 53.8% 56.5% 49.5% 65.3% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 11/11 4.0 4.7 62.5% 70.1% 50.4% 52.3% 31.9% 62.8% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 20/20 4.8 4.1 61.9% 68.9% 54.0% 61.4% 29.9% 63.1% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 805/873 6.9 3.9 58.7% 74.7% 52.5% 60.6% 42.7% 65.5% 37.5% — 452/507 10.0 2.8 53.9% 78.1% 52.8% 61.7% 43.4% 66.3% 37.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tommy Haas Mardy Fish
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1996 1588 144.9 +0.04 +2.74 1.057 51.8% +30 — — 58.8% +0.77 0–1 2–0 — -0.78 2000 1524 106.9 — — — — -10 — +79 35.3% -1.29 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — +0.29
19 1997 1723 139.6 +1.11 +0.51 1.027 50.7% -2 -80 -102 54.9% +0.37 9–8 (53%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.37 2001 1543 124.2 — — — — +34 — +26 37.8% -0.54 5–4 (56%) 0–4 (0%) — -0.58
20 1998 1821 150.9 +0.55 +1.94 1.010 50.5% -13 -133 -149 51.4% +0.19 10–6 (63%) 10–9 (53%) — -2.69 2002 1630 123.4 — — — — +7 — -44 47.4% -0.32 4–3 (57%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.37
21 1999 1833 148.8 +1.86 -1.09 1.003 50.2% +21 -62 -115 60.7% +0.62 13–7 (65%) 20–19 (51%) — +0.33 2003 1841 146.3 +3.97 -0.87 1.064 50.8% +36 -346 -162 57.3% +0.28 15–8 (65%) 18–18 (50%) — -0.62
22 2000 1814 145.1 +1.31 -0.68 0.983 49.9% +30 -33 -96 53.0% +0.31 14–3 (82%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.61 2004 1761 139.2 +1.62 -0.32 1.019 50.7% +14 — -26 54.0% +0.36 12–5 (71%) 6–11 (35%) — +0.83
23 2001 2012 160.6 +4.03 +2.88 1.170 52.7% +26 -246 -364 67.6% +1.30 17–3 (85%) 13–18 (42%) — -1.10 2005 1641 122.4 -1.17 -0.67 0.875 47.6% +31 — — 34.9% -0.84 4–0 (100%) 2–7 (22%) — -0.38
24 2002 1863 149.4 +3.04 +0.31 1.074 51.4% +35 +17 — 62.0% +0.66 19–7 (73%) 17–11 (61%) — +1.60 2006 1727 137.0 +3.82 +0.31 1.121 52.1% -53 -159 +51 54.8% +0.55 6–5 (55%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.33
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1756 144.3 +2.76 +0.38 1.067 51.0% +30 -208 -75 50.5% +0.02 8–6 (57%) 11–13 (46%) — +0.23
26 2004 1917 153.9 +3.05 +2.94 1.143 52.4% +36 -67 -248 60.3% +0.68 10–5 (67%) 9–10 (47%) — -2.50 2008 1861 148.1 +1.58 +0.64 1.033 50.7% +50 -274 -175 56.0% +0.36 10–6 (63%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.64
27 2005 1767 138.3 +1.76 +0.90 1.088 51.1% +34 +44 -63 58.6% +0.48 4–8 (33%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.64 2009 1816 145.3 +2.33 +0.49 1.105 51.8% +26 -197 -21 55.3% +0.47 5–8 (38%) 7–9 (44%) — -0.08
28 2006 1892 153.4 +4.99 +1.83 1.194 52.7% +57 -145 -124 69.5% +1.12 13–8 (62%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.81 2010 2023 156.7 +4.21 +2.02 1.209 53.0% +22 -393 -76 67.2% +0.98 10–6 (63%) 20–5 (80%) — +0.51
29 2007 1894 152.7 +4.56 +2.83 1.249 53.6% +31 -196 -35 65.2% +1.02 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) — +2.11 2011 2012 168.6 +4.73 +3.34 1.217 53.5% +6 -303 +46 64.1% +0.86 10–8 (56%) 14–10 (58%) — +1.88
30 2008 1858 140.5 +1.47 +1.79 1.068 51.1% +30 — +20 54.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.96 2012 2013 152.5 +3.05 +2.62 1.209 53.3% +23 — +55 61.5% +0.88 5–2 (71%) 8–8 (50%) — +2.93
31 2009 1941 151.0 +3.54 -0.13 1.093 51.7% -108 -141 +173 61.2% +0.76 10–6 (63%) 15–13 (54%) — -1.53 2013 1936 131.0 -1.70 +0.61 0.959 49.0% +18 — — 45.0% -0.10 3–1 (75%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.20
32 2010 1866 115.9 -0.81 -0.45 0.960 49.6% -85 — — 45.5% -0.05 1–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 1772 128.1 -0.01 -0.99 0.941 48.9% +11 — +215 45.1% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 8–6 (57%) — +1.11 2015 1885 133.8 -0.64 +1.74 1.060 51.0% +16 — — 44.4% +0.61 0–2 0–3 (0%) — -0.26
34 2012 1975 163.7 +4.25 +2.56 1.182 52.7% -70 -48 +106 61.9% +0.71 7–7 (50%) 11–5 (69%) — -1.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 2024 167.7 +3.58 +2.30 1.133 52.1% -25 +9 +118 65.3% +0.87 13–8 (62%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 1911 147.8 +1.08 +0.76 1.066 51.1% +26 +47 — 58.8% +0.77 7–2 (78%) 5–2 (71%) — +1.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 1788 121.7 -0.85 -1.47 0.835 47.3% +57 — +212 32.3% -1.23 0–3 (0%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 1689 129.1 -1.47 -2.29 0.859 47.7% +75 +108 +206 36.0% -0.80 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2117 158.2 +2.62 +1.22 1.087 51.5% +10 -44 +3 59.5% +0.62 170–105 (62%) 198–152 (57%) 109.2 -0.69 — 2116 154.2 +2.92 +0.94 1.100 51.7% +19 -269 -43 55.6% +0.38 99–65 (60%) 107–118 (48%) 103.9 +1.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.