H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Max Mirnyi H2H: 7-1

Tommy Haas holds a 7–1 lead over Max Mirnyi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 4–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2006 Canada Masters second round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
7 – 1
8 main draw meetings
Max Mirnyi
BLR Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 9, 2006* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tommy Haas #17 6-3 6-3 Max Mirnyi #54 Match data
Feb 19, 2005* Memphis ATP 250 SF Hard Max Mirnyi #39 7-5 6-3 Tommy Haas #14 Match data
Feb 12, 2005* San Jose ATP 250 QF Hard Tommy Haas #17 6-7(2) 7-6(3) 6-2 Max Mirnyi #41 Match data
May 8, 2002* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Tommy Haas #7 6-2 6-2 Max Mirnyi #35 Match data
Mar 20, 2002* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tommy Haas #5 6-2 6-0 Max Mirnyi #40 Match data
Oct 22, 2001* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 F Hard Tommy Haas #10 6-2 6-2 6-2 Max Mirnyi #35 Match data
Jun 14, 2001* Halle ATP 250 R32 Grass Tommy Haas #21 6-4 6-4 Max Mirnyi #51 Match data
Apr 18, 2001* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Tommy Haas #23 6-0 6-1 Max Mirnyi #40 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15
Max Mirnyi #1,155 #18 1,320 1,913 216 222 49.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Max Mirnyi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0 1996 0–2 0.0% #314 1,481 0 0
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0 1997 0–3 0.0% #340 1,443 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0 1998 1–2 33.3% #274 1,443 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1 1999 14–13 51.9% #74 1,613 0 0
22 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1 2000 27–25 51.9% #40 1,716 0 0
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5 2001 29–26 52.7% #35 1,865 0 0
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5 2002 24–27 47.1% #43 1,717 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2003 37–28 56.9% #23 1,785 0 1
26 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7 2004 20–25 44.4% #47 1,719 0 1
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7 2005 32–24 57.1% #34 1,735 0 1
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10 2006 21–24 46.7% #59 1,723 0 1
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11 2007 9–18 33.3% #152 1,593 0 1
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11 2008 2–5 28.6% #523 1,563 0 1
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12 — — — — — — —
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13 — — — — — — —
35 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15 — — — — — — —