H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Michael Llodra H2H: 3-0

Tommy Haas holds a 3–0 lead over Michael Llodra in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2009 Wimbledon second round 4-3 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Michael Llodra
FRA Age 46 Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 25, 2009* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Tommy Haas #34 4-3 (ret.) Michael Llodra #137 Match data
Mar 8, 2007* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tommy Haas #9 6-4 6-1 Michael Llodra #79 Match data
Nov 2, 2006* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Tommy Haas #13 7-6(7) 7-6(2) Michael Llodra #109 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15
Michael Llodra #631 #21 1,575 1,901 182 215 45.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Michael Llodra
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0 2000 5–7 41.7% #159 1,598 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1 2001 6–11 35.3% #89 1,602 0 0
22 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1 2002 12–17 41.4% #104 1,620 0 0
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5 2003 2–10 16.7% #173 1,590 0 0
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5 2004 20–12 62.5% #41 1,734 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 2005 10–20 33.3% #136 1,625 0 1
26 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7 2006 4–8 33.3% #96 1,608 0 1
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7 2007 13–18 41.9% #93 1,640 0 1
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10 2008 21–19 52.5% #40 1,725 0 3
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11 2009 17–16 51.5% #67 1,738 0 3
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11 2010 27–21 56.2% #23 1,879 0 5
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12 2011 17–21 44.7% #47 1,776 0 5
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12 2012 12–14 46.2% #53 1,842 0 5
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12 2013 12–15 44.4% #105 1,787 0 5
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13 2014 4–6 40.0% #269 1,688 0 5
35 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15 — — — — — — —