H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Tommy Haas vs Mikhail Youzhny H2H: 4-5
Mikhail Youzhny holds a 5–4 lead over Tommy Haas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on hard courts, while Mikhail Youzhny leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Mikhail Youzhny won the 2013 US Open third round 6-3 6-2 2-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 48
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4
–
5
9 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2013* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Mikhail Youzhny | 6-3 6-2 2-6 6-3 | Tommy Haas | Match data |
| Jun 4, 2013* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Tommy Haas | 6-1 6-1 6-3 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| May 14, 2013* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Mikhail Youzhny | 6-4 6-3 | Tommy Haas | Match data |
| Oct 4, 2012* | Beijing | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Mikhail Youzhny | 6-4 4-6 6-2 | Tommy Haas | Match data |
| Jul 30, 2008* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Tommy Haas | 7-6(2) 2-6 6-4 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Nov 2, 2007* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Mikhail Youzhny | 6-4 1-6 6-3 | Tommy Haas | Match data |
| Jan 7, 2006* | Doha | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Tommy Haas | 6-4 6-3 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Oct 10, 2002* | Vienna | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Tommy Haas | 6-2 2-6 7-5 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| May 4, 2002* | Munich | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Mikhail Youzhny | 6-2 2-0 (ret.) | Tommy Haas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Haas | #616 | #2 | 3,030 | 2,103 | 533 | 330 | 61.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 15 |
| Mikhail Youzhny | #115 | #8 | 3,500 | 2,069 | 477 | 405 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tommy Haas | Mikhail Youzhny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1996 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #170 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #113 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #45 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #58 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #34 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #32 | 1,866 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1999 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #43 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2000 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #23 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #16 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2001 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #8 | 2,009 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #43 | 1,758 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2002 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,849 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #24 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2004 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #17 | 1,909 | 0 | 7 | 2008 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #32 | 1,761 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2005 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,766 | 0 | 7 | 2009 | 41–27 | 60.3% | #19 | 1,960 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2006 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #11 | 1,893 | 0 | 10 | 2010 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2007 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #12 | 1,892 | 0 | 11 | 2011 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #35 | 1,837 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2008 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #82 | 1,855 | 0 | 11 | 2012 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #25 | 1,902 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 2009 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,913 | 0 | 12 | 2013 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #15 | 2,016 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #372 | 1,844 | 0 | 12 | 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #48 | 1,795 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | 2011 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #205 | 1,762 | 0 | 12 | 2015 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #127 | 1,701 | 0 | 10 |
| 34 | 2012 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,966 | 0 | 13 | 2016 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #57 | 1,774 | 0 | 10 |
| 35 | 2013 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #12 | 2,011 | 0 | 15 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #84 | 1,679 | 0 | 10 |
| 36 | 2014 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #77 | 1,904 | 0 | 15 | 2018 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #115 | 1,637 | 0 | 10 |
| 37 | 2015 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #470 | 1,784 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2017 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #252 | 1,686 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |