H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Mikhail Youzhny H2H: 4-5

Mikhail Youzhny holds a 5–4 lead over Tommy Haas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on hard courts, while Mikhail Youzhny leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Mikhail Youzhny won the 2013 US Open third round 6-3 6-2 2-6 6-3.

GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 5
9 main draw meetings
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 1, 2013* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #24 6-3 6-2 2-6 6-3 Tommy Haas #13 Match data
Jun 4, 2013* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Tommy Haas #14 6-1 6-1 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #31 Match data
May 14, 2013* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Mikhail Youzhny #30 6-4 6-3 Tommy Haas #14 Match data
Oct 4, 2012* Beijing ATP 500 R32 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #28 6-4 4-6 6-2 Tommy Haas #21 Match data
Jul 30, 2008* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tommy Haas #42 7-6(2) 2-6 6-4 Mikhail Youzhny #17 Match data
Nov 2, 2007* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #18 6-4 1-6 6-3 Tommy Haas #10 Match data
Jan 7, 2006* Doha ATP 250 QF Hard Tommy Haas #45 6-4 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #43 Match data
Oct 10, 2002* Vienna ATP 250 R32 Hard Tommy Haas #2 6-2 2-6 7-5 Mikhail Youzhny #45 Match data
May 4, 2002* Munich ATP 250 QF Clay Mikhail Youzhny #77 6-2 2-0 (ret.) Tommy Haas #7 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Mikhail Youzhny
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1
22 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2
25 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3
26 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10
35 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15