H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Tommy Haas vs Nicolas Almagro H2H: 3-0
Tommy Haas holds a 3–0 lead over Nicolas Almagro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2013 Indian Wells Masters third round 6-3 6-7(2) 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 48
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2013* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Tommy Haas | 6-3 6-7(2) 7-6(2) | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Oct 9, 2012* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Tommy Haas | 4-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Apr 28, 2005* | Munich | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Tommy Haas | 7-5 6-3 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Haas | #616 | #2 | 3,030 | 2,103 | 533 | 330 | 61.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 15 |
| Nicolas Almagro | #846 | #9 | 2,735 | 2,076 | 385 | 272 | 58.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tommy Haas | Nicolas Almagro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1996 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #170 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #103 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #45 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #34 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #32 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1999 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #28 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2000 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #23 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 34–16 | 68.0% | #18 | 1,794 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2001 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #8 | 2,009 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #26 | 1,831 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2002 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,849 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #10 | 1,874 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 2004 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #17 | 1,909 | 0 | 7 | 2012 | 51–21 | 70.8% | #11 | 2,010 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 2005 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,766 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #13 | 1,961 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 2006 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #11 | 1,893 | 0 | 10 | 2014 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #71 | 1,928 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 2007 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #12 | 1,892 | 0 | 11 | 2015 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,795 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 2008 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #82 | 1,855 | 0 | 11 | 2016 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,790 | 0 | 13 |
| 31 | 2009 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,913 | 0 | 12 | 2017 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #151 | 1,833 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #372 | 1,844 | 0 | 12 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #846 | 1,777 | 0 | 13 |
| 33 | 2011 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #205 | 1,762 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2012 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,966 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2013 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #12 | 2,011 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2014 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #77 | 1,904 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2015 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #470 | 1,784 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2017 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #252 | 1,686 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |