H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Nicolas Mahut H2H: 1-2

Nicolas Mahut holds a 2–1 lead over Tommy Haas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Mahut leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2008 Washington Open second round 7-6(4) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Nicolas Mahut
FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tommy Haas #48 7-6(4) 6-3 Nicolas Mahut #81 Match data Aug 15, 2008* R16 Washington Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Nicolas Mahut #71 6-4 6-4 Tommy Haas #11 Match data Sep 28, 2007* R16 Bangkok International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Nicolas Mahut #70 6-4 7-5 Tommy Haas #21 Match data Jul 21, 2006* R16 Indianapolis ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,116 540 333 61.9% 0 1 0 4 10 15
Nicolas Mahut #1,433 #37 1,122 1,930 179 224 44.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Nicolas Mahut
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,588 0 0 2000 0–2 0.0% #388 1,517 0 0
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,722 0 0 2001 1–4 20.0% #216 1,500 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,820 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #269 1,446 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,833 0 1 2003 3–6 33.3% #94 1,539 0 0
22 2000 32–21 60.4% #23 1,813 0 1 2004 3–10 23.1% #131 1,545 0 0
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,011 0 5 2005 1–5 16.7% #134 1,467 0 0
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,863 0 5 2006 11–19 36.7% #66 1,581 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2007 22–20 52.4% #45 1,732 0 0
26 2004 36–19 65.5% #17 1,916 0 7 2008 16–26 38.1% #94 1,645 0 0
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,767 0 7 2009 4–4 50.0% #214 1,634 0 0
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,892 0 10 2010 3–7 30.0% #132 1,663 0 0
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,894 0 11 2011 11–12 47.8% #80 1,776 0 0
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,857 0 11 2012 16–18 47.1% #108 1,757 0 0
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,940 0 12 2013 17–7 70.8% #50 1,852 0 2
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,865 0 12 2014 14–23 37.8% #117 1,664 0 2
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,771 0 12 2015 11–10 52.4% #71 1,767 0 3
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,975 0 13 2016 23–20 53.5% #39 1,871 0 4
35 2013 47–24 66.2% #12 2,024 0 15 2017 14–19 42.4% #103 1,754 0 4
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,911 0 15 2018 5–8 38.5% #190 1,708 0 4
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,788 0 15 2019 4–3 57.1% #194 1,707 0 4
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,689 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tommy Haas Nicolas Mahut
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1996 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1997 10 8 18 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1998 18 15 33 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1999 25 12 37 67.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2000 18 9 27 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2004 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 2001 41 12 53 77.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 2005 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2002 25 14 39 64.1% 17 7 24 70.8% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 4 9 13 30.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 11 13 24 45.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 3 13 76.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2004 24 11 35 68.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 13 16 29 44.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2005 15 12 27 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
28 2006 34 10 44 77.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 2010 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
29 2007 31 13 44 70.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2011 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
30 2008 15 11 26 57.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2012 10 14 24 41.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
31 2009 15 14 29 51.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — — 2013 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 2 14 85.7% — — — —
32 2010 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 7 13 20 35.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — —
33 2011 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2015 3 8 11 27.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
34 2012 16 12 28 57.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — 2016 13 14 27 48.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — —
35 2013 28 15 43 65.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2017 12 11 23 52.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
36 2014 7 6 13 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — 2018 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
37 2015 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2019 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
39 2017 0 3 3 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 335 197 532 63.0% 117 82 199 58.8% 57 34 91 62.6% 31 20 51 60.8% — 92 133 225 40.9% 17 39 56 30.4% 67 41 108 62.0% 3 11 14 21.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 805/873 of Tommy Haas's and 401/403 of Nicolas Mahut's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tommy Haas Nicolas Mahut
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1996 7/7 3.7 3.9 53.5% 70.9% 59.6% 71.3% 67.6% 65.3% 36.7% 2000 2/2 2.5 3.5 54.1% 65.6% 50.0% 54.2% 34.3% 58.4% 30.7%
19 1997 36/39 5.5 3.8 59.8% 71.0% 49.5% 55.1% 44.9% 62.5% 38.5% 2001 5/5 9.0 4.0 63.3% 71.4% 45.1% 59.0% 24.9% 61.6% 31.0%
20 1998 51/60 4.9 4.1 58.9% 71.1% 48.0% 55.1% 44.2% 61.3% 39.1% 2002 1/1 10.0 0.0 59.2% 69.0% 60.0% 0.0% 0.0% 65.3% 32.4%
21 1999 54/68 8.4 5.6 53.0% 76.3% 50.6% 62.2% 43.2% 64.2% 35.9% 2003 9/9 9.4 5.2 58.3% 71.9% 49.0% 55.7% 32.7% 62.4% 33.9%
22 2000 39/53 7.0 4.4 54.3% 74.2% 51.0% 59.5% 43.0% 63.5% 35.9% 2004 12/13 7.8 5.1 58.7% 68.5% 42.4% 46.6% 44.2% 57.7% 34.2%
23 2001 62/74 7.7 3.9 56.4% 76.7% 52.4% 64.4% 42.5% 66.0% 39.7% 2005 6/6 7.7 3.3 60.0% 77.5% 44.7% 36.9% 32.6% 64.2% 26.7%
24 2002 58/65 8.8 4.8 56.0% 75.4% 52.7% 61.9% 39.6% 65.5% 37.1% 2006 30/30 7.9 3.4 62.2% 70.5% 48.4% 56.4% 45.6% 62.2% 31.6%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 42/42 7.8 4.9 57.0% 75.5% 52.0% 61.9% 42.1% 65.2% 33.9%
26 2004 53/55 5.9 3.4 57.9% 75.9% 52.0% 57.3% 46.4% 65.7% 39.2% 2008 42/42 9.0 4.2 61.9% 72.6% 49.2% 63.1% 38.8% 63.7% 31.5%
27 2005 49/49 6.7 3.6 57.8% 74.3% 52.7% 52.9% 43.6% 65.2% 37.8% 2009 8/8 9.0 2.6 62.3% 80.1% 50.1% 63.2% 40.7% 68.9% 35.2%
28 2006 67/67 7.1 3.2 61.0% 76.4% 54.5% 60.1% 40.2% 67.9% 38.3% 2010 10/10 17.8 5.1 64.7% 76.0% 49.3% 66.9% 52.9% 66.5% 29.4%
29 2007 52/53 8.0 3.0 60.6% 78.1% 55.6% 61.9% 43.3% 69.0% 38.7% 2011 22/23 7.3 3.7 59.9% 74.6% 52.0% 61.9% 35.6% 65.3% 37.6%
30 2008 32/33 7.3 3.8 59.4% 72.6% 52.0% 62.8% 40.9% 64.3% 38.1% 2012 34/34 8.0 2.7 60.4% 72.3% 50.5% 64.5% 39.6% 63.8% 32.9%
31 2009 48/49 9.1 4.9 60.2% 77.6% 53.0% 65.4% 44.8% 67.7% 35.3% 2013 24/24 8.5 3.3 59.3% 79.5% 54.2% 71.3% 42.4% 69.1% 39.1%
32 2010 7/7 9.9 4.6 60.9% 72.3% 50.5% 65.2% 38.4% 63.4% 35.1% 2014 37/37 7.7 3.4 60.8% 72.2% 49.9% 55.5% 38.3% 63.6% 33.2%
33 2011 19/19 7.8 4.3 59.9% 70.7% 51.7% 60.5% 43.6% 62.9% 34.9% 2015 21/21 7.4 2.9 62.7% 72.3% 46.6% 58.6% 40.6% 63.0% 36.2%
34 2012 47/48 6.2 3.4 59.6% 75.7% 53.9% 65.6% 43.9% 66.9% 39.1% 2016 43/43 5.3 2.6 60.7% 74.0% 50.5% 58.7% 53.5% 64.9% 35.4%
35 2013 68/71 6.1 3.3 61.3% 74.8% 54.0% 63.0% 41.1% 66.6% 37.8% 2017 33/33 6.5 2.8 61.3% 70.8% 52.4% 60.0% 33.8% 63.7% 33.7%
36 2014 25/25 4.6 2.0 63.7% 72.2% 53.8% 56.5% 49.5% 65.3% 36.9% 2018 13/13 4.3 3.4 61.0% 72.2% 48.5% 54.4% 39.0% 62.9% 34.0%
37 2015 11/11 4.0 4.7 62.5% 70.1% 50.4% 52.3% 31.9% 62.8% 31.0% 2019 7/7 7.1 2.7 59.4% 72.5% 55.1% 71.2% 36.9% 65.8% 34.2%
39 2017 20/20 4.8 4.1 61.9% 68.9% 54.0% 61.4% 29.9% 63.1% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 805/873 6.9 3.9 58.7% 74.7% 52.5% 60.6% 42.7% 65.5% 37.5% — 401/403 7.7 3.5 60.6% 73.3% 50.1% 60.0% 41.0% 64.2% 33.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tommy Haas Nicolas Mahut
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1996 1588 144.9 +0.04 +2.74 1.057 51.8% +30 — — 58.8% +0.77 0–1 2–0 — -0.78 2000 1518 106.3 -0.24 -1.50 0.740 45.8% — — — 16.7% -1.50 0–1 — — +0.11
19 1997 1723 139.6 +1.11 +0.51 1.027 50.7% -2 -80 -102 54.9% +0.37 9–8 (53%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.37 2001 1500 110.5 -0.73 -2.42 0.806 46.0% +14 — — 31.3% -1.25 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.14
20 1998 1821 150.9 +0.55 +1.94 1.010 50.5% -13 -133 -149 51.4% +0.19 10–6 (63%) 10–9 (53%) — -2.69 2002 1447 95.7 -1.89 -0.35 0.934 45.8% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.22
21 1999 1833 148.8 +1.86 -1.09 1.003 50.2% +21 -62 -115 60.7% +0.62 13–7 (65%) 20–19 (51%) — +0.33 2003 1540 115.6 +0.41 -1.30 0.903 48.1% +28 — — 23.8% -1.38 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.20
22 2000 1814 145.1 +1.31 -0.68 0.983 49.9% +30 -33 -96 53.0% +0.31 14–3 (82%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.61 2004 1545 109.2 -3.28 -1.51 0.808 46.2% +20 -80 +2 29.4% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) — +0.16
23 2001 2012 160.6 +4.03 +2.88 1.170 52.7% +26 -246 -364 67.6% +1.30 17–3 (85%) 13–18 (42%) — -1.10 2005 1468 108.5 -0.35 -3.57 0.745 46.3% +26 — — 28.6% -1.00 0–2 0–2 — +0.50
24 2002 1863 149.4 +3.04 +0.31 1.074 51.4% +35 +17 — 62.0% +0.66 19–7 (73%) 17–11 (61%) — +1.60 2006 1582 128.9 +0.81 -3.33 0.835 47.0% -87 -146 +113 39.7% -0.46 3–1 (75%) 4–12 (25%) — -1.54
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1733 136.0 +2.07 -1.43 0.975 49.5% -133 -232 +160 51.4% +0.10 7–7 (50%) 10–13 (43%) — -1.38
26 2004 1917 153.9 +3.05 +2.94 1.143 52.4% +36 -67 -248 60.3% +0.68 10–5 (67%) 9–10 (47%) — -2.50 2008 1646 139.7 +0.72 -3.30 0.869 48.1% +10 -169 +149 38.0% -0.56 10–6 (63%) 7–18 (28%) — -1.66
27 2005 1767 138.3 +1.76 +0.90 1.088 51.1% +34 +44 -63 58.6% +0.48 4–8 (33%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.64 2009 1634 116.4 +1.22 +0.45 1.133 52.1% — — +194 52.6% +0.42 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.02
28 2006 1892 153.4 +4.99 +1.83 1.194 52.7% +57 -145 -124 69.5% +1.12 13–8 (62%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.81 2010 1663 119.6 +0.80 -3.07 0.879 48.7% -81 — +172 41.4% -0.41 1–3 (25%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.59
29 2007 1894 152.7 +4.56 +2.83 1.249 53.6% +31 -196 -35 65.2% +1.02 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) — +2.11 2011 1776 139.1 +1.77 +0.87 1.085 51.4% 0 — -11 51.9% +0.54 2–2 (50%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.18
30 2008 1858 140.5 +1.47 +1.79 1.068 51.1% +30 — +20 54.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.96 2012 1758 146.6 +0.71 -2.00 0.908 48.7% -26 -191 +12 47.3% -0.12 4–3 (57%) 9–8 (53%) — -1.76
31 2009 1941 151.0 +3.54 -0.13 1.093 51.7% -108 -141 +173 61.2% +0.76 10–6 (63%) 15–13 (54%) — -1.53 2013 1853 136.9 +4.19 +0.90 1.267 53.8% -98 — +138 67.3% +1.11 1–2 (33%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.94
32 2010 1866 115.9 -0.81 -0.45 0.960 49.6% -85 — — 45.5% -0.05 1–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.43 2014 1665 136.4 -0.71 -2.67 0.911 48.4% -1 -159 +232 40.9% -0.33 4–5 (44%) 9–12 (43%) — +0.82
33 2011 1772 128.1 -0.01 -0.99 0.941 48.9% +11 — +215 45.1% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 8–6 (57%) — +1.11 2015 1767 136.4 -0.11 +0.13 0.976 49.7% -83 -165 +250 55.0% -0.22 2–5 (29%) 11–2 (85%) — +0.49
34 2012 1975 163.7 +4.25 +2.56 1.182 52.7% -70 -48 +106 61.9% +0.71 7–7 (50%) 11–5 (69%) — -1.93 2016 1872 149.7 +1.33 -0.93 1.009 50.1% -84 -256 +228 52.4% +0.15 7–4 (64%) 9–11 (45%) — +1.44
35 2013 2024 167.7 +3.58 +2.30 1.133 52.1% -25 +9 +118 65.3% +0.87 13–8 (62%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.12 2017 1754 138.7 +0.15 -2.13 0.929 49.1% +26 -152 +157 42.5% -0.46 6–7 (46%) 9–5 (64%) — +0.80
36 2014 1911 147.8 +1.08 +0.76 1.066 51.1% +26 +47 — 58.8% +0.77 7–2 (78%) 5–2 (71%) — +1.30 2018 1708 129.0 -0.69 -0.86 0.916 48.2% +41 — — 33.3% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.03
37 2015 1788 121.7 -0.85 -1.47 0.835 47.3% +57 — +212 32.3% -1.23 0–3 (0%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.82 2019 1707 120.2 +0.99 -0.41 1.000 50.7% — -37 +125 54.5% +0.55 2–1 (67%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.13
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1668 101.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 1689 129.1 -1.47 -2.29 0.859 47.7% +75 +108 +206 36.0% -0.80 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.60 2021 1629 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2117 158.2 +2.62 +1.22 1.087 51.5% +10 -44 +3 59.5% +0.62 170–105 (62%) 198–152 (57%) 109.2 -0.69 — 1930 140.6 +0.77 -1.60 0.946 49.2% -34 -161 +146 45.4% -0.20 54–57 (49%) 90–120 (43%) 97.9 -0.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.