H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Nicolas Mahut H2H: 1-2

Nicolas Mahut holds a 2–1 lead over Tommy Haas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Mahut leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2008 Washington fourth round 7-6(4) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Nicolas Mahut
FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 15, 2008* Washington ATP 500 R16 Hard Tommy Haas #48 7-6(4) 6-3 Nicolas Mahut #81 Match data
Sep 28, 2007* Bangkok ATP 250 R16 Hard Nicolas Mahut #71 6-4 6-4 Tommy Haas #11 Match data
Jul 17, 2006 Indianapolis ATP 250 R16 Hard Nicolas Mahut #70 6-4 7-5 Tommy Haas #21 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15
Nicolas Mahut #1,433 #37 1,122 1,926 179 224 44.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Nicolas Mahut
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0 2000 0–2 0.0% #388 1,516 0 0
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0 2001 1–4 20.0% #216 1,498 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #269 1,445 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1 2003 3–6 33.3% #94 1,538 0 0
22 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1 2004 3–10 23.1% #131 1,545 0 0
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5 2005 1–5 16.7% #134 1,467 0 0
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5 2006 11–19 36.7% #66 1,581 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2007 22–20 52.4% #45 1,732 0 0
26 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7 2008 16–26 38.1% #94 1,644 0 0
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7 2009 4–4 50.0% #214 1,633 0 0
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10 2010 3–7 30.0% #132 1,662 0 0
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11 2011 11–12 47.8% #80 1,765 0 0
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11 2012 16–18 47.1% #108 1,754 0 0
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12 2013 17–7 70.8% #50 1,851 0 2
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12 2014 14–23 37.8% #117 1,666 0 2
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12 2015 11–10 52.4% #71 1,767 0 3
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13 2016 23–20 53.5% #39 1,869 0 4
35 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15 2017 14–19 42.4% #103 1,753 0 4
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15 2018 5–8 38.5% #190 1,707 0 4
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15 2019 4–3 57.1% #194 1,707 0 4
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15 — — — — — — —