H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Nikolay Davydenko H2H: 1-4

Nikolay Davydenko holds a 4–1 lead over Tommy Haas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Nikolay Davydenko leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2008 Canada Masters third round 6-3 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Nikolay Davydenko
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 24, 2008* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #4 6-3 7-6(6) Tommy Haas #46 Match data
Sep 6, 2007* US Open Grand Slam QF Hard Nikolay Davydenko #4 6-3 6-3 6-4 Tommy Haas #10 Match data
Jan 25, 2007* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Tommy Haas #12 6-3 2-6 1-6 6-1 7-5 Nikolay Davydenko #3 Match data
Sep 8, 2006* US Open Grand Slam QF Hard Nikolay Davydenko #6 4-6 6-7(3) 6-3 6-4 6-4 Tommy Haas #16 Match data
May 29, 2005* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #12 7-5 6-0 6-0 Tommy Haas #22 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Nikolay Davydenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0
22 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5
25 — — — — — — — 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10
26 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13 — — — — — — —
35 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15 — — — — — — —