H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Tommy Haas vs Pete Sampras H2H: 4-5
Pete Sampras holds a 5–4 lead over Tommy Haas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Pete Sampras leads 5–2 on hard courts, while Tommy Haas leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pete Sampras won the 2002 US Open fourth round 7-5 6-4 6-7(5) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 48
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4
–
5
9 main draw meetings
USA
Age 54
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2002* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Pete Sampras | 7-5 6-4 6-7(5) 7-5 | Tommy Haas | Match data |
| Aug 3, 2002* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Tommy Haas | 7-6(3) 3-6 7-6(5) | Pete Sampras | Match data |
| Aug 26, 2001* | Long Island | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Tommy Haas | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | Pete Sampras | Match data |
| Nov 6, 1999* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Carpet | Tommy Haas | (w/o) | Pete Sampras | Match data |
| Oct 24, 1998* | Lyon | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Tommy Haas | (w/o) | Pete Sampras | Match data |
| Aug 8, 1998* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Pete Sampras | 7-6(5) 6-2 | Tommy Haas | Match data |
| Feb 28, 1998* | Philadelphia | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Pete Sampras | 6-4 6-4 | Tommy Haas | Match data |
| Sep 27, 1996* | Basel | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Pete Sampras | 6-4 2-6 6-3 | Tommy Haas | Match data |
| Aug 12, 1996 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Pete Sampras | 6-3 6-4 | Tommy Haas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Haas | #616 | #2 | 3,030 | 2,103 | 533 | 330 | 61.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 15 |
| Pete Sampras | #34 | #1 | 5,792 | 2,265 | 737 | 208 | 78.0% | 14 | 11 | 7 | 0 | 32 | 64 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tommy Haas | Pete Sampras | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #81 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1996 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #170 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #5 | 2,047 | 1 | 4 |
| 19 | 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #45 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 52–17 | 75.4% | #6 | 2,091 | 1 | 8 |
| 20 | 1998 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #34 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #3 | 2,118 | 1 | 13 |
| 21 | 1999 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 82–15 | 84.5% | #1 | 2,126 | 3 | 21 |
| 22 | 2000 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #23 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 74–9 | 89.2% | #1 | 2,196 | 5 | 31 |
| 23 | 2001 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #8 | 2,009 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 66–17 | 79.5% | #1 | 2,134 | 7 | 36 |
| 24 | 2002 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,849 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 66–10 | 86.8% | #1 | 2,183 | 8 | 44 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 55–10 | 84.6% | #1 | 2,187 | 10 | 52 |
| 26 | 2004 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #17 | 1,909 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 61–18 | 77.2% | #1 | 2,042 | 11 | 56 |
| 27 | 2005 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,766 | 0 | 7 | 1999 | 38–9 | 80.9% | #3 | 2,117 | 12 | 61 |
| 28 | 2006 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #11 | 1,893 | 0 | 10 | 2000 | 40–11 | 78.4% | #3 | 2,068 | 13 | 63 |
| 29 | 2007 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #12 | 1,892 | 0 | 11 | 2001 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #10 | 2,003 | 13 | 63 |
| 30 | 2008 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #82 | 1,855 | 0 | 11 | 2002 | 25–14 | 64.1% | #13 | 1,977 | 14 | 64 |
| 31 | 2009 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,913 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #372 | 1,844 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2011 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #205 | 1,762 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2012 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,966 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2013 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #12 | 2,011 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2014 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #77 | 1,904 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2015 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #470 | 1,784 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2017 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #252 | 1,686 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |