H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Pete Sampras H2H: 4-5

Pete Sampras holds a 5–4 lead over Tommy Haas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Pete Sampras leads 5–2 on hard courts, while Tommy Haas leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pete Sampras won the 2002 US Open fourth round 7-5 6-4 6-7(5) 7-5.

GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 5
9 main draw meetings
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 4, 2002* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Pete Sampras #17 7-5 6-4 6-7(5) 7-5 Tommy Haas #3 Match data
Aug 3, 2002* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Tommy Haas #3 7-6(3) 3-6 7-6(5) Pete Sampras #15 Match data
Aug 26, 2001* Long Island ATP 250 F Hard Tommy Haas #16 6-3 3-6 6-2 Pete Sampras #10 Match data
Nov 6, 1999* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R16 Carpet Tommy Haas #14 (w/o) Pete Sampras #3 Match data
Oct 24, 1998* Lyon ATP 250 QF Carpet Tommy Haas #53 (w/o) Pete Sampras #1 Match data
Aug 8, 1998* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Pete Sampras #1 7-6(5) 6-2 Tommy Haas #41 Match data
Feb 28, 1998* Philadelphia ATP 250 SF Hard Pete Sampras #1 6-4 6-4 Tommy Haas #43 Match data
Sep 27, 1996* Basel ATP 250 R16 Hard Pete Sampras #1 6-4 2-6 6-3 Tommy Haas #219 Match data
Aug 12, 1996 Indianapolis ATP 250 QF Hard Pete Sampras #1 6-3 6-4 Tommy Haas #390 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15
Pete Sampras #34 #1 5,792 2,265 737 208 78.0% 14 11 7 0 32 64

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Pete Sampras
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 10–10 50.0% #97 1,605 0 0
17 1989 18–19 48.6% #81 1,699 0 0
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0 1990 51–19 72.9% #5 2,047 1 4
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0 1991 52–17 75.4% #6 2,091 1 8
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0 1992 66–15 81.5% #3 2,118 1 13
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1 1993 82–15 84.5% #1 2,126 3 21
22 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1 1994 74–9 89.2% #1 2,196 5 31
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5 1995 66–17 79.5% #1 2,134 7 36
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5 1996 66–10 86.8% #1 2,183 8 44
25 1997 55–10 84.6% #1 2,187 10 52
26 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7 1998 61–18 77.2% #1 2,042 11 56
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7 1999 38–9 80.9% #3 2,117 12 61
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10 2000 40–11 78.4% #3 2,068 13 63
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11 2001 33–15 68.8% #10 2,003 13 63
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11 2002 25–14 64.1% #13 1,977 14 64
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13
35 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15