H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 4-3

Tommy Haas holds a 4–3 lead over Radek Stepanek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Radek Stepanek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2013 Vienna quarterfinal 7-6(10) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Radek Stepanek
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 186 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 19, 2013* Vienna ATP 500 QF Hard Tommy Haas #12 7-6(10) 6-3 Radek Stepanek #46 Match data
Aug 10, 2012* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Tommy Haas #25 2-6 6-4 6-1 Radek Stepanek #40 Match data
Mar 24, 2012* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Radek Stepanek #25 7-6(4) 6-1 Tommy Haas #145 Match data
Jun 12, 2008* Halle ATP 500 R32 Grass Tommy Haas #37 6-7(0) 7-6(3) 6-4 Radek Stepanek #16 Match data
Aug 10, 2007* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Radek Stepanek #60 6-3 2-6 6-2 Tommy Haas #12 Match data
May 9, 2007* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Radek Stepanek #29 6-3 3-2 (ret.) Tommy Haas #11 Match data
Mar 1, 2007* Dubai ATP 500 R32 Hard Tommy Haas #9 6-4 6-3 Radek Stepanek #26 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15
Radek Stepanek #492 #8 2,700 2,034 366 283 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Radek Stepanek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #165 1,488 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0 1999 2–4 33.3% #169 1,501 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1 2001 0–1 0.0% #542 1,464 0 0
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5 2002 17–14 54.8% #63 1,659 0 0
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5 2003 24–22 52.2% #46 1,716 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2004 28–23 54.9% #33 1,790 0 0
26 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7 2005 45–26 63.4% #20 1,840 0 0
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7 2006 30–15 66.7% #19 1,865 0 1
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10 2007 27–21 56.2% #30 1,863 0 2
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11 2008 31–23 57.4% #27 1,837 0 2
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11 2009 44–19 69.8% #12 2,010 0 4
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12 2010 17–15 53.1% #62 1,872 0 4
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12 2011 30–24 55.6% #28 1,880 0 5
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12 2012 21–19 52.5% #31 1,930 0 5
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13 2013 14–16 46.7% #44 1,828 0 5
35 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15 2014 16–17 48.5% #68 1,801 0 5
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15 2015 7–10 41.2% #197 1,766 0 5
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15 2016 10–11 47.6% #107 1,866 0 5
38 — — — — — — — 2017 3–2 60.0% #354 1,900 0 5
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15 — — — — — — —