H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Richard Krajicek H2H: 1-1

Tommy Haas and Richard Krajicek are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 1999 Libéma Open quarterfinal 7-6(3) 1-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Richard Krajicek
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tommy Haas #17 7-6(3) 1-6 6-4 Richard Krajicek #5 Match data Jun 19, 1999* QF Libéma Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Richard Krajicek #13 3-6 6-4 6-1 Tommy Haas #41 Match data Jun 12, 1998* R16 Halle Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,116 540 333 61.9% 0 1 0 4 10 15
Richard Krajicek #1,044 #4 3,130 2,048 408 207 66.3% 1 2 0 5 9 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Richard Krajicek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,588 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,722 0 0 1991 26–20 56.5% #45 1,746 0 1
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,820 0 0 1992 47–24 66.2% #10 1,949 0 3
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,833 0 1 1993 36–20 64.3% #15 1,884 0 4
22 2000 32–21 60.4% #23 1,813 0 1 1994 32–13 71.1% #17 1,882 0 7
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,011 0 5 1995 40–20 66.7% #11 1,834 0 9
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,863 0 5 1996 46–24 65.7% #7 1,878 1 10
25 — — — — — — — 1997 50–19 72.5% #11 1,958 1 13
26 2004 36–19 65.5% #17 1,916 0 7 1998 45–16 73.8% #10 1,983 1 15
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,767 0 7 1999 42–20 67.7% #10 1,881 1 17
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,892 0 10 2000 26–15 63.4% #36 1,879 1 17
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,894 0 11 — — — — — — —
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,857 0 11 2002 7–6 53.8% #112 1,836 1 17
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,940 0 12 2003 11–10 52.4% #147 1,761 1 17
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,865 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,771 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,975 0 13 — — — — — — —
35 2013 47–24 66.2% #12 2,024 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,911 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,788 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,689 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tommy Haas Richard Krajicek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1996 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 10 8 18 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1991 17 9 26 65.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0%
20 1998 18 15 33 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1992 28 10 38 73.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8%
21 1999 25 12 37 67.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1993 14 8 22 63.6% 11 5 16 68.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5%
22 2000 18 9 27 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1994 11 4 15 73.3% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 2001 41 12 53 77.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 1995 14 9 23 60.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 18 4 22 81.8%
24 2002 25 14 39 64.1% 17 7 24 70.8% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1996 15 9 24 62.5% 13 4 17 76.5% 9 1 10 90.0% 9 10 19 47.4%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 21 8 29 72.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 9 2 11 81.8% 15 5 20 75.0%
26 2004 24 11 35 68.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1998 18 5 23 78.3% 9 4 13 69.2% 9 3 12 75.0% 9 4 13 69.2%
27 2005 15 12 27 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1999 30 12 42 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 2 8 75.0%
28 2006 34 10 44 77.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 2000 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2007 31 13 44 70.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 15 11 26 57.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2002 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
31 2009 15 14 29 51.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — — 2003 5 6 11 45.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
32 2010 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 16 12 28 57.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 28 15 43 65.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 7 6 13 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 0 3 3 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 335 197 532 63.0% 117 82 199 58.8% 57 34 91 62.6% 31 20 51 60.8% — 189 91 280 67.5% 76 43 119 63.9% 63 26 89 70.8% 80 47 127 63.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 805/873 of Tommy Haas's and 530/615 of Richard Krajicek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tommy Haas Richard Krajicek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1996 7/7 3.7 3.9 53.5% 70.9% 59.6% 71.3% 67.6% 65.3% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 36/39 5.5 3.8 59.8% 71.0% 49.5% 55.1% 44.9% 62.5% 38.5% 1991 40/46 9.2 4.0 55.3% 77.4% 51.6% 57.8% 43.4% 65.8% 37.4%
20 1998 51/60 4.9 4.1 58.9% 71.1% 48.0% 55.1% 44.2% 61.3% 39.1% 1992 61/71 11.0 3.5 58.4% 79.2% 54.5% 65.0% 41.3% 68.9% 37.9%
21 1999 54/68 8.4 5.6 53.0% 76.3% 50.6% 62.2% 43.2% 64.2% 35.9% 1993 46/56 10.3 4.3 60.2% 81.1% 50.7% 57.7% 47.2% 69.1% 37.8%
22 2000 39/53 7.0 4.4 54.3% 74.2% 51.0% 59.5% 43.0% 63.5% 35.9% 1994 42/45 11.7 4.0 55.0% 81.2% 50.6% 70.8% 47.6% 67.7% 38.1%
23 2001 62/74 7.7 3.9 56.4% 76.7% 52.4% 64.4% 42.5% 66.0% 39.7% 1995 54/60 11.5 3.1 59.0% 79.1% 51.2% 70.1% 41.8% 67.7% 36.1%
24 2002 58/65 8.8 4.8 56.0% 75.4% 52.7% 61.9% 39.6% 65.5% 37.1% 1996 61/70 12.8 3.4 58.1% 82.1% 49.2% 60.1% 41.1% 68.2% 37.3%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 61/69 14.3 3.1 57.8% 85.0% 53.3% 65.0% 43.2% 71.7% 37.3%
26 2004 53/55 5.9 3.4 57.9% 75.9% 52.0% 57.3% 46.4% 65.7% 39.2% 1998 50/61 14.9 3.4 59.8% 82.3% 53.6% 57.2% 44.1% 70.7% 36.9%
27 2005 49/49 6.7 3.6 57.8% 74.3% 52.7% 52.9% 43.6% 65.2% 37.8% 1999 47/62 13.4 2.8 61.1% 82.0% 52.2% 64.0% 43.5% 70.4% 37.8%
28 2006 67/67 7.1 3.2 61.0% 76.4% 54.5% 60.1% 40.2% 67.9% 38.3% 2000 35/41 14.9 3.4 58.6% 82.2% 55.1% 59.5% 35.2% 71.0% 36.7%
29 2007 52/53 8.0 3.0 60.6% 78.1% 55.6% 61.9% 43.3% 69.0% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 32/33 7.3 3.8 59.4% 72.6% 52.0% 62.8% 40.9% 64.3% 38.1% 2002 12/13 15.7 6.6 53.3% 81.8% 49.0% 67.7% 43.4% 66.1% 34.1%
31 2009 48/49 9.1 4.9 60.2% 77.6% 53.0% 65.4% 44.8% 67.7% 35.3% 2003 21/21 12.9 5.4 52.1% 79.9% 48.0% 67.4% 45.6% 64.4% 34.7%
32 2010 7/7 9.9 4.6 60.9% 72.3% 50.5% 65.2% 38.4% 63.4% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 19/19 7.8 4.3 59.9% 70.7% 51.7% 60.5% 43.6% 62.9% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 47/48 6.2 3.4 59.6% 75.7% 53.9% 65.6% 43.9% 66.9% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 68/71 6.1 3.3 61.3% 74.8% 54.0% 63.0% 41.1% 66.6% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 25/25 4.6 2.0 63.7% 72.2% 53.8% 56.5% 49.5% 65.3% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 11/11 4.0 4.7 62.5% 70.1% 50.4% 52.3% 31.9% 62.8% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 20/20 4.8 4.1 61.9% 68.9% 54.0% 61.4% 29.9% 63.1% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 805/873 6.9 3.9 58.7% 74.7% 52.5% 60.6% 42.7% 65.5% 37.5% — 530/615 12.5 3.6 58.0% 81.2% 51.9% 63.2% 43.0% 68.9% 37.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tommy Haas Richard Krajicek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1996 1588 144.9 +0.04 +2.74 1.057 51.8% +30 — — 58.8% +0.77 0–1 2–0 — -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 1723 139.6 +1.11 +0.51 1.027 50.7% -2 -80 -102 54.9% +0.37 9–8 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 105.9 +0.37 1991 1746 141.4 +4.23 -0.01 1.092 51.2% -23 -142 -131 56.0% +0.54 9–9 (50%) 10–12 (45%) 101.8 -1.45
20 1998 1821 150.9 +0.55 +1.94 1.010 50.5% -13 -133 -149 51.4% +0.19 10–6 (63%) 10–9 (53%) 107.9 -2.69 1992 1949 161.3 +6.70 +1.48 1.220 53.2% +15 -266 -275 63.5% +0.94 14–9 (61%) 18–17 (51%) 104.9 -1.66
21 1999 1833 148.8 +1.86 -1.09 1.003 50.2% +21 -62 -115 60.7% +0.62 13–7 (65%) 20–19 (51%) 104.0 +0.33 1993 1885 155.4 +6.73 +0.19 1.222 53.3% -30 +5 -123 60.6% +0.72 11–8 (58%) 14–15 (48%) 98.9 -1.17
22 2000 1814 145.1 +1.31 -0.68 0.983 49.9% +30 -33 -96 53.0% +0.31 14–3 (82%) 9–10 (47%) 107.0 -0.61 1994 1883 152.7 +5.16 +0.47 1.178 52.9% -19 +63 -64 69.4% +1.08 2–6 (25%) 12–12 (50%) 93.0 +0.23
23 2001 2012 160.6 +4.03 +2.88 1.170 52.7% +26 -246 -364 67.6% +1.30 17–3 (85%) 13–18 (42%) 104.3 -1.10 1995 1835 148.6 +4.66 -0.97 1.118 51.8% +66 +23 -81 64.6% +0.80 11–8 (58%) 16–15 (52%) 98.8 +1.78
24 2002 1863 149.4 +3.04 +0.31 1.074 51.4% +35 +17 — 62.0% +0.66 19–7 (73%) 17–11 (61%) 108.9 +1.60 1996 1879 156.6 +5.72 +0.26 1.174 52.7% -76 +74 +133 64.5% +0.84 11–4 (73%) 22–16 (58%) 108.1 +0.05
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1958 153.7 +8.64 +0.43 1.320 54.0% -8 -40 +49 69.5% +1.20 8–6 (57%) 20–22 (48%) 98.1 -0.46
26 2004 1917 153.9 +3.05 +2.94 1.143 52.4% +36 -67 -248 60.3% +0.68 10–5 (67%) 9–10 (47%) 103.2 -2.50 1998 1984 154.9 +7.61 +0.20 1.259 53.5% -7 -50 +57 69.1% +1.13 17–6 (74%) 24–12 (67%) 107.8 +0.64
27 2005 1767 138.3 +1.76 +0.90 1.088 51.1% +34 +44 -63 58.6% +0.48 4–8 (33%) 14–5 (74%) 97.9 +0.64 1999 1881 155.6 +6.78 +0.75 1.279 53.6% +61 -29 +52 66.0% +1.16 5–7 (42%) 12–15 (44%) 89.7 +0.83
28 2006 1892 153.4 +4.99 +1.83 1.194 52.7% +57 -145 -124 69.5% +1.12 13–8 (62%) 17–10 (63%) 102.2 +0.81 2000 1880 150.8 +7.72 -0.11 1.266 53.1% +52 -32 +50 61.1% +0.86 5–4 (56%) 8–12 (40%) 94.8 -1.68
29 2007 1894 152.7 +4.56 +2.83 1.249 53.6% +31 -196 -35 65.2% +1.02 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) 100.3 +2.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 1858 140.5 +1.47 +1.79 1.068 51.1% +30 — +20 54.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–7 (46%) 97.2 -0.96 2002 1837 125.9 +3.14 -0.36 1.008 50.0% +25 — +75 59.5% +0.32 2–3 (40%) 5–3 (63%) 98.6 -0.73
31 2009 1941 151.0 +3.54 -0.13 1.093 51.7% -108 -141 +173 61.2% +0.76 10–6 (63%) 15–13 (54%) 105.4 -1.53 2003 1762 123.4 +1.62 -1.25 0.973 49.6% +3 +73 +168 48.1% +0.06 5–2 (71%) 5–8 (38%) 98.1 -0.47
32 2010 1866 115.9 -0.81 -0.45 0.960 49.6% -85 — — 45.5% -0.05 1–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 1772 128.1 -0.01 -0.99 0.941 48.9% +11 — +215 45.1% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 8–6 (57%) 96.4 +1.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 1975 163.7 +4.25 +2.56 1.182 52.7% -70 -48 +106 61.9% +0.71 7–7 (50%) 11–5 (69%) 106.0 -1.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 2024 167.7 +3.58 +2.30 1.133 52.1% -25 +9 +118 65.3% +0.87 13–8 (62%) 16–10 (62%) 104.9 -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 1911 147.8 +1.08 +0.76 1.066 51.1% +26 +47 — 58.8% +0.77 7–2 (78%) 5–2 (71%) 107.1 +1.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 1788 121.7 -0.85 -1.47 0.835 47.3% +57 — +212 32.3% -1.23 0–3 (0%) 4–3 (57%) 96.1 -0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 1689 129.1 -1.47 -2.29 0.859 47.7% +75 +108 +206 36.0% -0.80 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 99.8 -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2117 158.2 +2.62 +1.22 1.087 51.5% +10 -44 +3 59.5% +0.62 170–105 (62%) 198–152 (57%) 109.2 -0.69 — 2049 158.4 +6.18 +0.22 1.195 52.8% +5 -20 +4 63.9% +0.89 100–72 (58%) 166–159 (51%) 99.5 -0.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.