H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Robin Soderling H2H: 3-1

Tommy Haas holds a 3–1 lead over Robin Soderling in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Robin Soderling leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2006 Halle Open quarterfinal 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Robin Soderling
SWE Age 42 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tommy Haas #26 7-5 6-4 Robin Soderling #50 Match data Jun 17, 2006* QF Halle Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Robin Soderling #54 6-2 2-1 (ret.) Tommy Haas #24 Match data May 17, 2006* R64 Hamburg Open Masters 1000 Clay
Tommy Haas #30 6-3 6-2 Robin Soderling #87 Match data Feb 26, 2006* F Memphis ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Tommy Haas #67 6-3 5-7 6-4 Robin Soderling #47 Match data Aug 7, 2004* R16 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,116 540 333 61.9% 0 1 0 4 10 15
Robin Soderling #195 #4 6,055 2,174 285 168 62.9% 0 1 0 2 7 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Robin Soderling
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2001 1–1 50.0% #444 1,519 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2002 1–5 16.7% #163 1,553 0 0
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,588 0 0 2003 10–6 62.5% #60 1,728 0 0
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,722 0 0 2004 31–27 53.4% #34 1,819 0 1
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,820 0 0 2005 16–18 47.1% #77 1,737 0 2
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,833 0 1 2006 33–22 60.0% #25 1,823 0 2
22 2000 32–21 60.4% #23 1,813 0 1 2007 22–15 59.5% #41 1,832 0 2
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,011 0 5 2008 40–20 66.7% #17 1,948 0 3
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,863 0 5 2009 44–23 65.7% #8 2,097 0 4
25 — — — — — — — 2010 53–22 70.7% #5 2,121 0 6
26 2004 36–19 65.5% #17 1,916 0 7 2011 34–9 79.1% #13 2,127 0 10
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,767 0 7 — — — — — — —
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,892 0 10 — — — — — — —
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,894 0 11 — — — — — — —
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,857 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,940 0 12 — — — — — — —
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,865 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,771 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,975 0 13 — — — — — — —
35 2013 47–24 66.2% #12 2,024 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,911 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,788 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,689 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tommy Haas Robin Soderling
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1996 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 7 4 11 63.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
19 1997 10 8 18 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2004 17 15 32 53.1% 3 7 10 30.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0%
20 1998 18 15 33 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2005 7 10 17 41.2% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 0 5 100.0%
21 1999 25 12 37 67.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2006 19 11 30 63.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 2000 18 9 27 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2007 10 6 16 62.5% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2001 41 12 53 77.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 2008 25 13 38 65.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 0 5 100.0%
24 2002 25 14 39 64.1% 17 7 24 70.8% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2009 26 16 42 61.9% 15 6 21 71.4% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 35 15 50 70.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
26 2004 24 11 35 68.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2011 19 3 22 86.4% 13 5 18 72.2% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
27 2005 15 12 27 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2006 34 10 44 77.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2007 31 13 44 70.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 15 11 26 57.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 15 14 29 51.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 16 12 28 57.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 28 15 43 65.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 7 6 13 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 0 3 3 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 335 197 532 63.0% 117 82 199 58.8% 57 34 91 62.6% 31 20 51 60.8% — 167 96 263 63.5% 71 49 120 59.2% 26 17 43 60.5% 21 6 27 77.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 805/873 of Tommy Haas's and 448/453 of Robin Soderling's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tommy Haas Robin Soderling
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 2/2 9.5 2.5 52.3% 71.3% 58.2% 71.4% 35.7% 65.0% 36.7%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 6/6 4.8 4.3 58.0% 66.6% 41.7% 46.1% 39.1% 55.9% 35.7%
18 1996 7/7 3.7 3.9 53.5% 70.9% 59.6% 71.3% 67.6% 65.3% 36.7% 2003 16/16 8.3 3.6 63.7% 75.0% 52.8% 51.7% 47.9% 66.8% 37.6%
19 1997 36/39 5.5 3.8 59.8% 71.0% 49.5% 55.1% 44.9% 62.5% 38.5% 2004 57/58 7.0 2.7 61.3% 73.0% 51.4% 58.5% 46.7% 64.6% 36.9%
20 1998 51/60 4.9 4.1 58.9% 71.1% 48.0% 55.1% 44.2% 61.3% 39.1% 2005 34/34 9.2 3.9 60.0% 73.1% 48.6% 68.0% 44.5% 63.4% 36.0%
21 1999 54/68 8.4 5.6 53.0% 76.3% 50.6% 62.2% 43.2% 64.2% 35.9% 2006 55/55 6.7 2.9 63.4% 75.9% 53.4% 67.2% 42.2% 67.7% 38.7%
22 2000 39/53 7.0 4.4 54.3% 74.2% 51.0% 59.5% 43.0% 63.5% 35.9% 2007 37/37 7.4 2.6 62.3% 74.9% 51.0% 56.6% 46.1% 65.9% 40.1%
23 2001 62/74 7.7 3.9 56.4% 76.7% 52.4% 64.4% 42.5% 66.0% 39.7% 2008 59/60 10.5 2.8 61.8% 79.9% 55.0% 70.2% 44.2% 70.4% 37.9%
24 2002 58/65 8.8 4.8 56.0% 75.4% 52.7% 61.9% 39.6% 65.5% 37.1% 2009 64/67 8.9 2.8 59.7% 78.3% 56.0% 64.4% 46.8% 69.2% 39.0%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 75/75 9.9 3.3 59.2% 78.3% 52.6% 66.0% 45.1% 67.7% 39.4%
26 2004 53/55 5.9 3.4 57.9% 75.9% 52.0% 57.3% 46.4% 65.7% 39.2% 2011 43/43 8.0 2.7 62.9% 76.0% 54.4% 56.9% 46.3% 67.9% 40.3%
27 2005 49/49 6.7 3.6 57.8% 74.3% 52.7% 52.9% 43.6% 65.2% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2006 67/67 7.1 3.2 61.0% 76.4% 54.5% 60.1% 40.2% 67.9% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2007 52/53 8.0 3.0 60.6% 78.1% 55.6% 61.9% 43.3% 69.0% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 32/33 7.3 3.8 59.4% 72.6% 52.0% 62.8% 40.9% 64.3% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 48/49 9.1 4.9 60.2% 77.6% 53.0% 65.4% 44.8% 67.7% 35.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 7/7 9.9 4.6 60.9% 72.3% 50.5% 65.2% 38.4% 63.4% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 19/19 7.8 4.3 59.9% 70.7% 51.7% 60.5% 43.6% 62.9% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 47/48 6.2 3.4 59.6% 75.7% 53.9% 65.6% 43.9% 66.9% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 68/71 6.1 3.3 61.3% 74.8% 54.0% 63.0% 41.1% 66.6% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 25/25 4.6 2.0 63.7% 72.2% 53.8% 56.5% 49.5% 65.3% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 11/11 4.0 4.7 62.5% 70.1% 50.4% 52.3% 31.9% 62.8% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 20/20 4.8 4.1 61.9% 68.9% 54.0% 61.4% 29.9% 63.1% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 805/873 6.9 3.9 58.7% 74.7% 52.5% 60.6% 42.7% 65.5% 37.5% — 448/453 8.5 3.0 61.2% 76.3% 53.0% 63.3% 45.2% 67.2% 38.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tommy Haas Robin Soderling
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1519 112.1 +0.27 +0.13 1.047 50.2% — — — 50.0% +0.25 — — — -0.15
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1554 115.3 -3.43 -0.70 0.809 46.1% +62 -67 — 31.3% -1.25 0–1 2–3 (40%) — -0.09
18 1996 1588 144.9 +0.04 +2.74 1.057 51.8% +30 — — 58.8% +0.77 0–1 2–0 — -0.78 2003 1729 131.0 +1.72 +1.37 1.132 52.0% -13 — -32 57.1% +0.55 2–1 (67%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.25
19 1997 1723 139.6 +1.11 +0.51 1.027 50.7% -2 -80 -102 54.9% +0.37 9–8 (53%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.37 2004 1820 148.4 +1.68 +0.70 1.041 50.8% +14 -282 -138 53.4% +0.31 9–12 (43%) 16–13 (55%) — -3.53
20 1998 1821 150.9 +0.55 +1.94 1.010 50.5% -13 -133 -149 51.4% +0.19 10–6 (63%) 10–9 (53%) — -2.69 2005 1738 135.0 +0.73 -0.84 0.986 49.9% +56 -187 -96 49.4% +0.06 5–4 (56%) 10–12 (45%) — -0.02
21 1999 1833 148.8 +1.86 -1.09 1.003 50.2% +21 -62 -115 60.7% +0.62 13–7 (65%) 20–19 (51%) — +0.33 2006 1823 152.2 +4.87 +2.04 1.200 52.9% 0 -152 -111 59.2% +0.64 8–10 (44%) 10–14 (42%) — -0.90
22 2000 1814 145.1 +1.31 -0.68 0.983 49.9% +30 -33 -96 53.0% +0.31 14–3 (82%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.61 2007 1832 149.5 +2.84 +2.66 1.176 52.9% +14 -116 -76 60.2% +0.80 8–8 (50%) 8–8 (50%) — -1.51
23 2001 2012 160.6 +4.03 +2.88 1.170 52.7% +26 -246 -364 67.6% +1.30 17–3 (85%) 13–18 (42%) — -1.10 2008 1948 162.9 +6.87 +1.96 1.279 53.7% +29 -144 -139 62.9% +1.10 11–6 (65%) 8–17 (32%) — -3.43
24 2002 1863 149.4 +3.04 +0.31 1.074 51.4% +35 +17 — 62.0% +0.66 19–7 (73%) 17–11 (61%) — +1.60 2009 2098 167.1 +5.93 +3.27 1.268 53.8% -49 -40 -206 63.7% +0.99 7–9 (44%) 16–17 (48%) — -1.00
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 2122 171.5 +4.91 +4.01 1.222 53.4% -9 +7 -147 65.3% +1.12 14–8 (64%) 11–10 (52%) — -1.54
26 2004 1917 153.9 +3.05 +2.94 1.143 52.4% +36 -67 -248 60.3% +0.68 10–5 (67%) 9–10 (47%) — -2.50 2011 2128 166.5 +4.27 +3.85 1.257 53.8% +23 +78 -111 71.2% +1.27 8–1 (89%) 10–7 (59%) — -0.37
27 2005 1767 138.3 +1.76 +0.90 1.088 51.1% +34 +44 -63 58.6% +0.48 4–8 (33%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2006 1892 153.4 +4.99 +1.83 1.194 52.7% +57 -145 -124 69.5% +1.12 13–8 (62%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2007 1894 152.7 +4.56 +2.83 1.249 53.6% +31 -196 -35 65.2% +1.02 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) — +2.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 1858 140.5 +1.47 +1.79 1.068 51.1% +30 — +20 54.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 1941 151.0 +3.54 -0.13 1.093 51.7% -108 -141 +173 61.2% +0.76 10–6 (63%) 15–13 (54%) — -1.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 1866 115.9 -0.81 -0.45 0.960 49.6% -85 — — 45.5% -0.05 1–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 1772 128.1 -0.01 -0.99 0.941 48.9% +11 — +215 45.1% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 8–6 (57%) — +1.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 1975 163.7 +4.25 +2.56 1.182 52.7% -70 -48 +106 61.9% +0.71 7–7 (50%) 11–5 (69%) — -1.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 2024 167.7 +3.58 +2.30 1.133 52.1% -25 +9 +118 65.3% +0.87 13–8 (62%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 1911 147.8 +1.08 +0.76 1.066 51.1% +26 +47 — 58.8% +0.77 7–2 (78%) 5–2 (71%) — +1.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 1788 121.7 -0.85 -1.47 0.835 47.3% +57 — +212 32.3% -1.23 0–3 (0%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 1689 129.1 -1.47 -2.29 0.859 47.7% +75 +108 +206 36.0% -0.80 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2117 158.2 +2.62 +1.22 1.087 51.5% +10 -44 +3 59.5% +0.62 170–105 (62%) 198–152 (57%) 109.2 -0.69 — 2175 163.7 +4.10 +2.30 1.175 52.7% +5 -76 -120 60.7% +0.79 72–60 (55%) 96–105 (48%) 99.2 -2.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.