H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 2-0

Tommy Haas holds a 2–0 lead over Sargis Sargsian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2004 Cincinnati Masters third round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Sargis Sargsian
ARM Age 53 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 5, 2004* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Tommy Haas #67 6-3 6-3 Sargis Sargsian #59 Match data
Sep 13, 2002* Tashkent ATP 250 R16 Hard Tommy Haas #2 7-6(5) 6-4 Sargis Sargsian #82 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15
Sargis Sargsian #1,525 #38 978 1,811 155 205 43.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Sargis Sargsian
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0 1993 1–1 50.0% #615 1,514 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1 1995 2–2 50.0% #220 1,568 0 0
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5 1996 3–5 37.5% #104 1,569 0 0
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5 1997 18–23 43.9% #69 1,674 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 1998 18–25 41.9% #98 1,623 0 1
26 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7 1999 21–23 47.7% #59 1,637 0 1
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7 2000 15–25 37.5% #94 1,584 0 1
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10 2001 16–19 45.7% #72 1,628 0 1
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11 2002 13–19 40.6% #103 1,650 0 1
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11 2003 28–26 51.9% #39 1,774 0 1
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12 2004 17–26 39.5% #75 1,699 0 1
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12 2005 3–9 25.0% #294 1,588 0 1
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12 2006 0–2 0.0% #809 1,576 0 1
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13 — — — — — — —
35 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15 — — — — — — —