H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tommy Haas vs Thomas Johansson H2H: 1-0
Tommy Haas holds a 1–0 lead over Thomas Johansson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tommy Haas leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2001 Paris Masters quarterfinal 4-6 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 48
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2001* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Carpet | Tommy Haas | 4-6 6-1 6-3 | Thomas Johansson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Haas | #616 | #2 | 3,030 | 2,103 | 533 | 330 | 61.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 15 |
| Thomas Johansson | #586 | #7 | 2,365 | 1,969 | 336 | 277 | 54.8% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tommy Haas | Thomas Johansson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1996 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #170 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #422 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #45 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #486 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #34 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #117 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #60 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #23 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #39 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2001 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #8 | 2,009 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 46–30 | 60.5% | #17 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2002 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,849 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #39 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #39 | 1,825 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2004 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #17 | 1,909 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #18 | 1,875 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2005 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,766 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #14 | 1,746 | 1 | 7 |
| 28 | 2006 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #11 | 1,893 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2007 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #12 | 1,892 | 0 | 11 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #30 | 1,855 | 1 | 8 |
| 30 | 2008 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #82 | 1,855 | 0 | 11 | 2005 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,892 | 1 | 9 |
| 31 | 2009 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,913 | 0 | 12 | 2006 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #71 | 1,723 | 1 | 9 |
| 32 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #372 | 1,844 | 0 | 12 | 2007 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,759 | 1 | 9 |
| 33 | 2011 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #205 | 1,762 | 0 | 12 | 2008 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #136 | 1,673 | 1 | 9 |
| 34 | 2012 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,966 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2013 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #12 | 2,011 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2014 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #77 | 1,904 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2015 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #470 | 1,784 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2017 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #252 | 1,686 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |