H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Todd Martin H2H: 3-1

Tommy Haas holds a 3–1 lead over Todd Martin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Todd Martin won the 2002 Indian Wells Open round of 32 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Todd Martin
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Todd Martin #64 6-4 6-2 Tommy Haas #6 Match data Mar 14, 2002* R32 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Tommy Haas #9 6-7(8) 6-3 3-6 6-4 6-1 Todd Martin #56 Match data Jan 20, 2002* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Tommy Haas #20 6-3 6-2 Todd Martin #54 Match data Jan 11, 2001* R32 Sydney International ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Tommy Haas #22 6-3 7-6(4) Todd Martin #12 Match data Feb 20, 1999* SF Memphis ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,116 540 333 61.9% 0 1 0 4 10 15
Todd Martin #145 #4 2,969 2,064 398 223 64.1% 0 0 0 3 5 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Todd Martin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,588 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,722 0 0 1990 3–4 42.9% #269 1,515 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,820 0 0 1991 10–8 55.6% #134 1,652 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,833 0 1 1992 22–19 53.7% #87 1,724 0 0
22 2000 32–21 60.4% #23 1,813 0 1 1993 45–23 66.2% #13 1,886 0 1
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,011 0 5 1994 50–19 72.5% #10 1,945 0 3
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,863 0 5 1995 45–21 68.2% #18 1,913 0 4
25 — — — — — — — 1996 49–20 71.0% #12 1,923 0 5
26 2004 36–19 65.5% #17 1,916 0 7 1997 13–7 65.0% #81 1,913 0 5
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,767 0 7 1998 43–20 68.3% #16 1,998 0 7
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,892 0 10 1999 42–17 71.2% #7 1,914 0 8
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,894 0 11 2000 14–12 53.8% #55 1,862 0 8
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,857 0 11 2001 13–11 54.2% #57 1,816 0 8
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,940 0 12 2002 24–16 60.0% #47 1,785 0 8
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,865 0 12 2003 15–11 57.7% #68 1,842 0 8
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,771 0 12 2004 10–15 40.0% #145 1,688 0 8
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,975 0 13 — — — — — — —
35 2013 47–24 66.2% #12 2,024 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,911 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,788 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,689 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tommy Haas Todd Martin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1996 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 10 8 18 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1990 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 1998 18 15 33 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1991 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1999 25 12 37 67.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1992 12 10 22 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 2000 18 9 27 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1993 21 12 33 63.6% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 2 10 80.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
23 2001 41 12 53 77.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 1994 22 8 30 73.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 10 1 11 90.9% 8 6 14 57.1%
24 2002 25 14 39 64.1% 17 7 24 70.8% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 25 10 35 71.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 29 10 39 74.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 7 4 11 63.6%
26 2004 24 11 35 68.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — 6 4 10 60.0%
27 2005 15 12 27 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1998 26 12 38 68.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
28 2006 34 10 44 77.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 1999 30 11 41 73.2% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2007 31 13 44 70.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2000 11 7 18 61.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2008 15 11 26 57.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2001 8 6 14 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
31 2009 15 14 29 51.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — — 2002 17 11 28 60.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
32 2010 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
33 2011 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
34 2012 16 12 28 57.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 28 15 43 65.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 7 6 13 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 0 3 3 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 335 197 532 63.0% 117 82 199 58.8% 57 34 91 62.6% 31 20 51 60.8% — 227 122 349 65.0% 64 42 106 60.4% 59 25 84 70.2% 48 34 82 58.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 805/873 of Tommy Haas's and 49/51 of Todd Martin's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tommy Haas Todd Martin
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1996 7/7 3.7 3.9 53.5% 70.9% 59.6% 71.3% 67.6% 65.3% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 36/39 5.5 3.8 59.8% 71.0% 49.5% 55.1% 44.9% 62.5% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 51/60 4.9 4.1 58.9% 71.1% 48.0% 55.1% 44.2% 61.3% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1999 54/68 8.4 5.6 53.0% 76.3% 50.6% 62.2% 43.2% 64.2% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2000 39/53 7.0 4.4 54.3% 74.2% 51.0% 59.5% 43.0% 63.5% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2001 62/74 7.7 3.9 56.4% 76.7% 52.4% 64.4% 42.5% 66.0% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2002 58/65 8.8 4.8 56.0% 75.4% 52.7% 61.9% 39.6% 65.5% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2004 53/55 5.9 3.4 57.9% 75.9% 52.0% 57.3% 46.4% 65.7% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2005 49/49 6.7 3.6 57.8% 74.3% 52.7% 52.9% 43.6% 65.2% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2006 67/67 7.1 3.2 61.0% 76.4% 54.5% 60.1% 40.2% 67.9% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2007 52/53 8.0 3.0 60.6% 78.1% 55.6% 61.9% 43.3% 69.0% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 32/33 7.3 3.8 59.4% 72.6% 52.0% 62.8% 40.9% 64.3% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 48/49 9.1 4.9 60.2% 77.6% 53.0% 65.4% 44.8% 67.7% 35.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 7/7 9.9 4.6 60.9% 72.3% 50.5% 65.2% 38.4% 63.4% 35.1% 2003 24/26 10.0 5.2 58.9% 77.1% 51.2% 63.9% 49.9% 66.4% 36.8%
33 2011 19/19 7.8 4.3 59.9% 70.7% 51.7% 60.5% 43.6% 62.9% 34.9% 2004 25/25 10.5 4.1 62.5% 75.3% 49.7% 57.7% 31.7% 65.7% 35.3%
34 2012 47/48 6.2 3.4 59.6% 75.7% 53.9% 65.6% 43.9% 66.9% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 68/71 6.1 3.3 61.3% 74.8% 54.0% 63.0% 41.1% 66.6% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 25/25 4.6 2.0 63.7% 72.2% 53.8% 56.5% 49.5% 65.3% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 11/11 4.0 4.7 62.5% 70.1% 50.4% 52.3% 31.9% 62.8% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 20/20 4.8 4.1 61.9% 68.9% 54.0% 61.4% 29.9% 63.1% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 805/873 6.9 3.9 58.7% 74.7% 52.5% 60.6% 42.7% 65.5% 37.5% — 49/621 10.3 4.6 60.8% 76.2% 50.4% 60.7% 40.6% 66.1% 36.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tommy Haas Todd Martin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1996 1588 144.9 +0.04 +2.74 1.057 51.8% +30 — — 58.8% +0.77 0–1 2–0 — -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 1723 139.6 +1.11 +0.51 1.027 50.7% -2 -80 -102 54.9% +0.37 9–8 (53%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.37 1990 1516 114.1 — — — — +28 — — 40.0% 0.00 2–0 0–4 (0%) — +0.50
20 1998 1821 150.9 +0.55 +1.94 1.010 50.5% -13 -133 -149 51.4% +0.19 10–6 (63%) 10–9 (53%) — -2.69 1991 1652 125.4 — — — — -62 -40 -7 55.8% +0.56 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) — +1.12
21 1999 1833 148.8 +1.86 -1.09 1.003 50.2% +21 -62 -115 60.7% +0.62 13–7 (65%) 20–19 (51%) — +0.33 1992 1724 141.4 — — — — -19 -110 -46 55.8% +0.54 4–9 (31%) 8–8 (50%) — +0.21
22 2000 1814 145.1 +1.31 -0.68 0.983 49.9% +30 -33 -96 53.0% +0.31 14–3 (82%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.61 1993 1887 155.8 — — — — -16 -193 -64 62.4% +0.78 10–9 (53%) 16–17 (48%) — -0.69
23 2001 2012 160.6 +4.03 +2.88 1.170 52.7% +26 -246 -364 67.6% +1.30 17–3 (85%) 13–18 (42%) — -1.10 1994 1945 157.2 — — — — -18 -177 +80 64.0% +0.94 19–8 (70%) 26–17 (60%) — -1.38
24 2002 1863 149.4 +3.04 +0.31 1.074 51.4% +35 +17 — 62.0% +0.66 19–7 (73%) 17–11 (61%) — +1.60 1995 1913 152.5 — — — — +27 -141 +46 62.5% +0.71 11–4 (73%) 20–12 (63%) — -0.11
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1923 161.1 — — — — +26 -122 +82 66.3% +1.07 11–10 (52%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.56
26 2004 1917 153.9 +3.05 +2.94 1.143 52.4% +36 -67 -248 60.3% +0.68 10–5 (67%) 9–10 (47%) — -2.50 1997 1914 152.5 — — — — +27 — — 63.3% +0.53 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) — -1.34
27 2005 1767 138.3 +1.76 +0.90 1.088 51.1% +34 +44 -63 58.6% +0.48 4–8 (33%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.64 1998 1999 161.9 — — — — +10 -105 -16 64.0% +0.82 12–7 (63%) 19–11 (63%) — -4.34
28 2006 1892 153.4 +4.99 +1.83 1.194 52.7% +57 -145 -124 69.5% +1.12 13–8 (62%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.81 1999 1914 156.7 — — — — +32 +22 +54 63.2% +0.70 14–10 (58%) 26–16 (62%) — -0.18
29 2007 1894 152.7 +4.56 +2.83 1.249 53.6% +31 -196 -35 65.2% +1.02 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) — +2.11 2000 1862 141.9 — — — — +57 +9 +96 54.5% +0.48 3–4 (43%) 7–10 (41%) — -0.87
30 2008 1858 140.5 +1.47 +1.79 1.068 51.1% +30 — +20 54.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.96 2001 1816 132.4 — — — — +63 -59 +147 51.3% -0.17 6–3 (67%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.33
31 2009 1941 151.0 +3.54 -0.13 1.093 51.7% -108 -141 +173 61.2% +0.76 10–6 (63%) 15–13 (54%) — -1.53 2002 1786 147.1 — — — — +51 -34 +125 58.3% +0.40 6–6 (50%) 14–10 (58%) — -2.19
32 2010 1866 115.9 -0.81 -0.45 0.960 49.6% -85 — — 45.5% -0.05 1–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.43 2003 1842 133.5 +2.69 +0.10 1.096 51.8% +8 -108 +98 61.8% +0.46 1–5 (17%) 9–6 (60%) — -0.41
33 2011 1772 128.1 -0.01 -0.99 0.941 48.9% +11 — +215 45.1% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 8–6 (57%) — +1.11 2004 1688 130.3 +1.82 +0.03 1.029 50.4% +23 +23 +195 43.8% -0.21 5–6 (45%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.17
34 2012 1975 163.7 +4.25 +2.56 1.182 52.7% -70 -48 +106 61.9% +0.71 7–7 (50%) 11–5 (69%) — -1.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 2024 167.7 +3.58 +2.30 1.133 52.1% -25 +9 +118 65.3% +0.87 13–8 (62%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 1911 147.8 +1.08 +0.76 1.066 51.1% +26 +47 — 58.8% +0.77 7–2 (78%) 5–2 (71%) — +1.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 1788 121.7 -0.85 -1.47 0.835 47.3% +57 — +212 32.3% -1.23 0–3 (0%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 1689 129.1 -1.47 -2.29 0.859 47.7% +75 +108 +206 36.0% -0.80 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2117 158.2 +2.62 +1.22 1.087 51.5% +10 -44 +3 59.5% +0.62 170–105 (62%) 198–152 (57%) 109.2 -0.69 — 2064 158.1 +2.25 +0.06 1.062 51.1% +15 -99 +51 60.5% +0.64 108–88 (55%) 185–143 (56%) 101.2 -2.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.