H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Todd Martin H2H: 3-1

Tommy Haas holds a 3–1 lead over Todd Martin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Todd Martin won the 2002 Indian Wells Masters third round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Todd Martin
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 14, 2002* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Todd Martin #64 6-4 6-2 Tommy Haas #6 Match data
Jan 20, 2002* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Tommy Haas #9 6-7(8) 6-3 3-6 6-4 6-1 Todd Martin #56 Match data
Jan 11, 2001* Sydney ATP 250 R32 Hard Tommy Haas #20 6-3 6-2 Todd Martin #54 Match data
Feb 20, 1999* Memphis ATP 250 SF Hard Tommy Haas #22 6-3 7-6(4) Todd Martin #12 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15
Todd Martin #145 #4 2,969 2,063 398 222 64.2% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Todd Martin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0 1990 3–4 42.9% #269 1,508 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0 1991 10–8 55.6% #134 1,648 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1 1992 22–19 53.7% #87 1,724 0 0
22 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1 1993 45–23 66.2% #13 1,886 0 1
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5 1994 50–19 72.5% #10 1,943 0 3
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5 1995 45–21 68.2% #18 1,912 0 4
25 — — — — — — — 1996 49–20 71.0% #12 1,926 0 5
26 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7 1997 13–7 65.0% #81 1,914 0 5
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7 1998 43–20 68.3% #16 1,998 0 7
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10 1999 42–17 71.2% #7 1,914 0 8
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11 2000 14–11 56.0% #55 1,887 0 8
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11 2001 13–11 54.2% #57 1,823 0 8
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12 2002 24–16 60.0% #47 1,788 0 8
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12 2003 15–11 57.7% #68 1,828 0 8
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12 2004 10–15 40.0% #145 1,684 0 8
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13 — — — — — — —
35 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15 — — — — — — —