H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Tommy Haas vs Vladimir Voltchkov H2H: 0-1
Vladimir Voltchkov holds a 1–0 lead over Tommy Haas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vladimir Voltchkov leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vladimir Voltchkov won the 2002 Tashkent quarterfinal 6-2 2-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 48
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BLR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2002* | Tashkent | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Vladimir Voltchkov | 6-2 2-1 (ret.) | Tommy Haas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Haas | #616 | #2 | 3,030 | 2,103 | 533 | 330 | 61.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 15 |
| Vladimir Voltchkov | #1,605 | #25 | 1,108 | 1,784 | 50 | 68 | 42.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Tommy Haas | Vladimir Voltchkov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1996 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #170 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #668 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #45 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #34 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #23 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #46 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #8 | 2,009 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #99 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,849 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #73 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #17 | 1,909 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #120 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,766 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #192 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #11 | 1,893 | 0 | 10 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #12 | 1,892 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #82 | 1,855 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,913 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #372 | 1,844 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #205 | 1,762 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,966 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #12 | 2,011 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #77 | 1,904 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #470 | 1,784 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #252 | 1,686 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |