H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Wayne Ferreira H2H: 3-0

Tommy Haas holds a 3–0 lead over Wayne Ferreira in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2000 Sydney Olympics first round 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Wayne Ferreira
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tommy Haas #48 7-5 6-2 Wayne Ferreira #20 Match data Sep 21, 2000* R64 Sydney Olympics Olympics Hard
Tommy Haas #21 6-3 2-6 7-5 Wayne Ferreira #46 Match data Feb 19, 2000* QF Memphis ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Tommy Haas #13 6-2 7-6(2) Wayne Ferreira #51 Match data Oct 28, 1999* R32 Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,116 540 333 61.9% 0 1 0 4 10 15
Wayne Ferreira #1,099 #6 2,701 2,024 487 317 60.6% 0 2 0 1 12 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Wayne Ferreira
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,588 0 0 1990 2–5 28.6% #173 1,528 0 0
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,722 0 0 1991 26–21 55.3% #41 1,713 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,820 0 0 1992 49–25 66.2% #12 1,843 0 2
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,833 0 1 1993 38–25 60.3% #22 1,820 0 2
22 2000 32–21 60.4% #23 1,813 0 1 1994 66–25 72.5% #12 1,925 0 7
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,011 0 5 1995 55–25 68.8% #9 1,929 0 11
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,863 0 5 1996 48–25 65.8% #10 1,841 0 13
25 — — — — — — — 1997 26–22 54.2% #42 1,815 0 13
26 2004 36–19 65.5% #17 1,916 0 7 1998 33–24 57.9% #26 1,824 0 13
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,767 0 7 1999 27–25 51.9% #53 1,705 0 13
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,892 0 10 2000 41–22 65.1% #13 1,883 0 14
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,894 0 11 2001 16–21 43.2% #62 1,705 0 14
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,857 0 11 2002 24–18 57.1% #39 1,811 0 14
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,940 0 12 2003 24–19 55.8% #26 1,760 0 15
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,865 0 12 2004 12–15 44.4% #128 1,691 0 15
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,771 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,975 0 13 — — — — — — —
35 2013 47–24 66.2% #12 2,024 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,911 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,788 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,689 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tommy Haas Wayne Ferreira
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1996 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
19 1997 10 8 18 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1991 16 11 27 59.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
20 1998 18 15 33 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1992 25 11 36 69.4% 12 7 19 63.2% 9 1 10 90.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
21 1999 25 12 37 67.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1993 24 11 35 68.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 8 12 33.3%
22 2000 18 9 27 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1994 41 10 51 80.4% 7 5 12 58.3% 10 3 13 76.9% 8 7 15 53.3%
23 2001 41 12 53 77.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 1995 19 14 33 57.6% 14 3 17 82.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 17 5 22 77.3%
24 2002 25 14 39 64.1% 17 7 24 70.8% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1996 31 12 43 72.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 16 10 26 61.5% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2004 24 11 35 68.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1998 17 14 31 54.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
27 2005 15 12 27 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1999 15 14 29 51.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
28 2006 34 10 44 77.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 2000 30 12 42 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 2007 31 13 44 70.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2001 7 11 18 38.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 2008 15 11 26 57.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2002 15 11 26 57.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 2009 15 14 29 51.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — — 2003 17 12 29 58.6% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 2010 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 9 12 21 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
33 2011 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 16 12 28 57.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 28 15 43 65.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 7 6 13 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 0 3 3 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 335 197 532 63.0% 117 82 199 58.8% 57 34 91 62.6% 31 20 51 60.8% — 283 168 451 62.7% 86 63 149 57.7% 65 32 97 67.0% 53 54 107 49.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 805/873 of Tommy Haas's and 697/797 of Wayne Ferreira's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tommy Haas Wayne Ferreira
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1996 7/7 3.7 3.9 53.5% 70.9% 59.6% 71.3% 67.6% 65.3% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 36/39 5.5 3.8 59.8% 71.0% 49.5% 55.1% 44.9% 62.5% 38.5% 1991 40/47 4.4 2.7 56.9% 70.6% 50.3% 49.1% 46.8% 62.1% 39.6%
20 1998 51/60 4.9 4.1 58.9% 71.1% 48.0% 55.1% 44.2% 61.3% 39.1% 1992 63/74 6.7 3.0 55.1% 73.9% 50.7% 62.5% 44.0% 63.3% 39.6%
21 1999 54/68 8.4 5.6 53.0% 76.3% 50.6% 62.2% 43.2% 64.2% 35.9% 1993 54/63 6.6 2.8 56.2% 73.1% 49.7% 56.2% 44.8% 62.8% 39.0%
22 2000 39/53 7.0 4.4 54.3% 74.2% 51.0% 59.5% 43.0% 63.5% 35.9% 1994 83/91 7.3 2.4 56.3% 73.6% 52.6% 62.2% 46.1% 64.5% 40.6%
23 2001 62/74 7.7 3.9 56.4% 76.7% 52.4% 64.4% 42.5% 66.0% 39.7% 1995 73/80 6.7 2.7 56.0% 74.2% 49.1% 59.0% 42.0% 63.2% 40.6%
24 2002 58/65 8.8 4.8 56.0% 75.4% 52.7% 61.9% 39.6% 65.5% 37.1% 1996 62/73 7.6 2.9 55.2% 75.6% 49.1% 57.1% 42.2% 63.8% 38.6%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 41/48 6.4 3.3 52.4% 74.1% 50.1% 55.5% 44.1% 62.6% 38.7%
26 2004 53/55 5.9 3.4 57.9% 75.9% 52.0% 57.3% 46.4% 65.7% 39.2% 1998 49/57 6.2 3.2 53.7% 74.4% 49.8% 56.5% 37.8% 63.0% 37.1%
27 2005 49/49 6.7 3.6 57.8% 74.3% 52.7% 52.9% 43.6% 65.2% 37.8% 1999 44/52 7.8 3.6 53.7% 76.2% 49.5% 56.4% 35.5% 64.0% 35.6%
28 2006 67/67 7.1 3.2 61.0% 76.4% 54.5% 60.1% 40.2% 67.9% 38.3% 2000 52/63 8.1 3.0 54.4% 75.4% 52.5% 60.7% 43.7% 65.0% 38.1%
29 2007 52/53 8.0 3.0 60.6% 78.1% 55.6% 61.9% 43.3% 69.0% 38.7% 2001 36/37 7.4 2.9 53.3% 73.7% 48.7% 50.4% 37.7% 61.9% 35.9%
30 2008 32/33 7.3 3.8 59.4% 72.6% 52.0% 62.8% 40.9% 64.3% 38.1% 2002 32/42 9.7 3.1 53.7% 75.5% 51.8% 59.0% 45.9% 64.5% 35.0%
31 2009 48/49 9.1 4.9 60.2% 77.6% 53.0% 65.4% 44.8% 67.7% 35.3% 2003 41/43 7.4 2.5 57.6% 73.3% 52.0% 64.5% 34.5% 64.1% 36.6%
32 2010 7/7 9.9 4.6 60.9% 72.3% 50.5% 65.2% 38.4% 63.4% 35.1% 2004 27/27 6.5 2.7 57.0% 69.6% 53.5% 55.7% 37.2% 62.8% 33.4%
33 2011 19/19 7.8 4.3 59.9% 70.7% 51.7% 60.5% 43.6% 62.9% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 47/48 6.2 3.4 59.6% 75.7% 53.9% 65.6% 43.9% 66.9% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 68/71 6.1 3.3 61.3% 74.8% 54.0% 63.0% 41.1% 66.6% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 25/25 4.6 2.0 63.7% 72.2% 53.8% 56.5% 49.5% 65.3% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 11/11 4.0 4.7 62.5% 70.1% 50.4% 52.3% 31.9% 62.8% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 20/20 4.8 4.1 61.9% 68.9% 54.0% 61.4% 29.9% 63.1% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 805/873 6.9 3.9 58.7% 74.7% 52.5% 60.6% 42.7% 65.5% 37.5% — 697/804 7.0 2.9 55.2% 74.0% 50.6% 58.1% 42.1% 63.5% 38.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tommy Haas Wayne Ferreira
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1996 1588 144.9 +0.04 +2.74 1.057 51.8% +30 — — 58.8% +0.77 0–1 2–0 — -0.78 1990 1529 106.7 — — — — +4 — +43 38.9% -0.50 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.74
19 1997 1723 139.6 +1.11 +0.51 1.027 50.7% -2 -80 -102 54.9% +0.37 9–8 (53%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.37 1991 1713 140.8 +1.01 +0.76 1.045 50.5% -8 -109 -124 55.6% +0.31 6–6 (50%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.33
20 1998 1821 150.9 +0.55 +1.94 1.010 50.5% -13 -133 -149 51.4% +0.19 10–6 (63%) 10–9 (53%) — -2.69 1992 1844 150.1 +1.86 +1.37 1.079 51.4% -40 -90 -30 61.6% +0.56 13–9 (59%) 14–13 (52%) — +1.33
21 1999 1833 148.8 +1.86 -1.09 1.003 50.2% +21 -62 -115 60.7% +0.62 13–7 (65%) 20–19 (51%) — +0.33 1993 1820 147.3 +1.45 +1.28 1.048 50.7% -7 -110 +62 55.4% +0.25 13–5 (72%) 15–8 (65%) — -0.39
22 2000 1814 145.1 +1.31 -0.68 0.983 49.9% +30 -33 -96 53.0% +0.31 14–3 (82%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.61 1994 1926 153.9 +2.71 +3.14 1.146 52.6% +12 -174 +31 66.1% +0.98 25–11 (69%) 17–18 (49%) — -1.12
23 2001 2012 160.6 +4.03 +2.88 1.170 52.7% +26 -246 -364 67.6% +1.30 17–3 (85%) 13–18 (42%) — -1.10 1995 1929 153.8 +1.35 +2.81 1.104 51.9% +1 -10 -46 62.0% +0.71 20–9 (69%) 15–19 (44%) — +2.01
24 2002 1863 149.4 +3.04 +0.31 1.074 51.4% +35 +17 — 62.0% +0.66 19–7 (73%) 17–11 (61%) — +1.60 1996 1841 151.0 +2.07 +1.61 1.069 51.2% -5 +101 +71 59.2% +0.49 18–8 (69%) 15–14 (52%) — +0.39
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1815 140.4 +0.88 +0.38 1.034 50.5% +13 +52 +82 53.0% +0.26 12–8 (60%) 11–11 (50%) — +0.69
26 2004 1917 153.9 +3.05 +2.94 1.143 52.4% +36 -67 -248 60.3% +0.68 10–5 (67%) 9–10 (47%) — -2.50 1998 1824 152.8 +1.42 +0.81 1.003 49.7% -7 +48 +89 55.9% +0.26 13–7 (65%) 10–11 (48%) — -4.20
27 2005 1767 138.3 +1.76 +0.90 1.088 51.1% +34 +44 -63 58.6% +0.48 4–8 (33%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.64 1999 1705 139.5 +1.33 -1.08 0.989 49.8% +25 +131 +113 50.7% -0.06 12–10 (55%) 14–12 (54%) — +0.17
28 2006 1892 153.4 +4.99 +1.83 1.194 52.7% +57 -145 -124 69.5% +1.12 13–8 (62%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.81 2000 1883 148.6 +2.46 +1.75 1.087 51.3% +7 -57 -24 58.0% +0.45 13–8 (62%) 14–16 (47%) — +0.27
29 2007 1894 152.7 +4.56 +2.83 1.249 53.6% +31 -196 -35 65.2% +1.02 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) — +2.11 2001 1705 132.4 +0.45 -1.42 0.944 48.8% +43 +43 +100 48.4% -0.29 5–9 (36%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.55
30 2008 1858 140.5 +1.47 +1.79 1.068 51.1% +30 — +20 54.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.96 2002 1811 141.0 +1.54 -1.23 0.985 50.2% -10 -94 +18 55.9% +0.37 11–6 (65%) 12–15 (44%) — -0.70
31 2009 1941 151.0 +3.54 -0.13 1.093 51.7% -108 -141 +173 61.2% +0.76 10–6 (63%) 15–13 (54%) — -1.53 2003 1761 144.9 +1.68 +0.18 1.020 50.4% +10 +2 — 55.1% +0.40 7–2 (78%) 8–10 (44%) — -1.02
32 2010 1866 115.9 -0.81 -0.45 0.960 49.6% -85 — — 45.5% -0.05 1–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.43 2004 1692 120.9 +0.36 -2.47 0.899 48.1% -21 — +102 46.5% -0.52 1–3 (25%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.57
33 2011 1772 128.1 -0.01 -0.99 0.941 48.9% +11 — +215 45.1% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 8–6 (57%) — +1.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 1975 163.7 +4.25 +2.56 1.182 52.7% -70 -48 +106 61.9% +0.71 7–7 (50%) 11–5 (69%) — -1.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 2024 167.7 +3.58 +2.30 1.133 52.1% -25 +9 +118 65.3% +0.87 13–8 (62%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 1911 147.8 +1.08 +0.76 1.066 51.1% +26 +47 — 58.8% +0.77 7–2 (78%) 5–2 (71%) — +1.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 1788 121.7 -0.85 -1.47 0.835 47.3% +57 — +212 32.3% -1.23 0–3 (0%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 1689 129.1 -1.47 -2.29 0.859 47.7% +75 +108 +206 36.0% -0.80 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2117 158.2 +2.62 +1.22 1.087 51.5% +10 -44 +3 59.5% +0.62 170–105 (62%) 198–152 (57%) 109.2 -0.69 — 2024 151.9 +1.61 +1.00 1.049 50.8% 0 -17 +31 57.2% +0.38 169–103 (62%) 169–167 (50%) 103.3 -0.37

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.