H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tommy Ho vs Albert Chang H2H: 1-1
Tommy Ho and Albert Chang are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Albert Chang leads 1–0 on carpet, while Tommy Ho leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tommy Ho won the 1995 Wimbledon first round 3-6 6-2 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 53
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 55
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 1995* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Tommy Ho | 3-6 6-2 6-3 7-5 | Albert Chang | Match data |
| Sep 29, 1994* | Kuala Lumpur | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Albert Chang | 6-2 6-2 | Tommy Ho | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Ho | #1,306 | #85 | 522 | 1,622 | 36 | 66 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Albert Chang | #980 | #140 | 331 | 1,553 | 6 | 17 | 26.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tommy Ho | Albert Chang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #625 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1989 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #641 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1990 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #182 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1991 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #165 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #127 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #482 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #169 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #250 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1256 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #512 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |