H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tommy Ho vs Johan Kriek H2H: 0-2
Johan Kriek holds a 2–0 lead over Tommy Ho in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Johan Kriek leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Johan Kriek won the 1988 Scottsdale third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 53
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 68
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 1988* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Johan Kriek | 6-4 6-1 | Tommy Ho | Match data |
| Aug 31, 1988* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Johan Kriek | 6-4 7-6 7-6 | Tommy Ho | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Ho | #1,306 | #85 | 522 | 1,622 | 36 | 66 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Johan Kriek | #859 | #7 | 268 | 2,052 | 380 | 223 | 63.0% | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tommy Ho | Johan Kriek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #625 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1989 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #641 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1990 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #182 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1991 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #278 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,781 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #165 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #35 | 1,879 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1995 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #127 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #17 | 1,976 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #482 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #19 | 1,955 | 1 | 4 |
| 24 | 1997 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #250 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #9 | 1,960 | 2 | 7 |
| 25 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1256 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,952 | 2 | 10 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #13 | 1,916 | 2 | 12 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #14 | 1,907 | 2 | 13 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #23 | 1,880 | 2 | 13 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #48 | 1,737 | 2 | 14 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #39 | 1,788 | 2 | 14 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #52 | 1,700 | 2 | 14 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #413 | 1,683 | 2 | 14 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #274 | 1,611 | 2 | 14 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1097 | 1,593 | 2 | 14 |