H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:33 UTC
Tommy Paul vs Botic van de Zandschulp H2H: 1-1
Tommy Paul and Botic van de Zandschulp are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tommy Paul leads 1–0 on grass, while Botic van de Zandschulp leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Paul won the 2026 HSBC Championships fourth round 7-6(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 29
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Netherlands
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2026 | HSBC Championships | ATP 500 | R16 | Grass | Tommy Paul | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data |
| Nov 2, 2023* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Botic van de Zandschulp | 6-4 2-6 6-3 | Tommy Paul | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Paul | #24 | #8 | 3,510 | 2,044 | 227 | 146 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #55 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,932 | 114 | 118 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tommy Paul | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #282 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #152 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #202 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #90 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #54 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2021 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #43 | 1,925 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2022 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #32 | 1,935 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #13 | 1,910 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2024 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #12 | 1,967 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2025 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #20 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2026 | 30–13 | 69.8% | #24 | 1,948 | 0 | 5 | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |