H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Tommy Robredo vs Denis Istomin H2H: 1-0

Tommy Robredo holds a 1–0 lead over Denis Istomin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tommy Robredo leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Robredo won the 2010 Metz round of 16 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Robredo
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Denis Istomin
UZB Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tommy Robredo #40 6-4 6-2 Denis Istomin #42 Match data Sep 24, 2010* R16 Metz ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,051 525 353 59.8% 0 1 0 1 10 12
Denis Istomin #1,509 #33 1,217 1,914 196 249 44.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Robredo Denis Istomin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1 2006 0–2 0.0% #200 1,474 0 0
20 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,793 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,760 0 1 2008 2–2 50.0% #105 1,559 0 0
22 2004 41–25 62.1% #13 1,831 0 2 2009 13–17 43.3% #102 1,635 0 0
23 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,851 0 2 2010 29–29 50.0% #40 1,767 0 0
24 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,867 0 4 2011 10–21 32.3% #73 1,665 0 0
25 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6 2012 28–30 48.3% #43 1,751 0 0
26 2008 35–23 60.3% #21 1,872 0 7 2013 30–29 50.8% #45 1,811 0 0
27 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,905 0 9 2014 27–24 52.9% #49 1,860 0 0
28 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9 2015 20–23 46.5% #61 1,789 0 1
29 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,785 0 10 2016 6–20 23.1% #121 1,707 0 1
30 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,768 0 10 2017 15–18 45.5% #63 1,723 0 2
31 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,004 0 12 2018 12–18 40.0% #92 1,678 0 2
32 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,999 0 12 2019 3–11 21.4% #177 1,575 0 2
33 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,884 0 12 2020 0–1 0.0% #184 1,552 0 2
34 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,813 0 12 2021 0–3 0.0% #254 1,537 0 2
35 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12 2022 1–1 50.0% #467 1,570 0 2
36 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,583 0 12 — — — — — — —
40 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tommy Robredo Denis Istomin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1999 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 10 7 17 58.8% 23 9 32 71.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2002 14 14 28 50.0% 14 7 21 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 10 14 24 41.7% 22 8 30 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2008 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 20 12 32 62.5% 14 7 21 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2009 9 12 21 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
23 2005 20 11 31 64.5% 18 9 27 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2010 17 19 36 47.2% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
24 2006 22 16 38 57.9% 22 6 28 78.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2011 7 10 17 41.2% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
25 2007 27 13 40 67.5% 18 9 27 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 17 17 34 50.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — —
26 2008 12 14 26 46.2% 21 7 28 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2013 25 19 44 56.8% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 2009 17 13 30 56.7% 27 9 36 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2014 13 17 30 43.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
28 2010 15 15 30 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2015 9 15 24 37.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
29 2011 8 7 15 53.3% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2016 1 10 11 9.1% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
30 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 11 8 19 57.9% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
31 2013 9 9 18 50.0% 25 10 35 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2018 5 8 13 38.5% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
32 2014 25 13 38 65.8% 15 12 27 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2019 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
33 2015 11 10 21 52.4% 11 8 19 57.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1 2 3 33.3% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — — 2022 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2022 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 226 182 408 55.4% 256 130 386 66.3% 30 24 54 55.6% 13 17 30 43.3% — 119 148 267 44.6% 40 67 107 37.4% 37 33 70 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 853/878 of Tommy Robredo's and 437/445 of Denis Istomin's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tommy Robredo Denis Istomin
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1999 2/4 0.0 0.5 62.8% 65.2% 54.5% 55.0% 72.7% 61.7% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 2/2 0.0 3.5 63.6% 62.8% 26.7% 65.7% 16.7% 49.7% 28.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 52/57 3.5 2.9 64.8% 70.5% 51.2% 58.7% 47.5% 63.6% 40.7% 2006 2/2 7.5 2.0 61.5% 66.3% 47.4% 60.2% 22.2% 59.1% 27.3%
20 2002 48/57 1.9 2.8 68.1% 63.7% 50.6% 54.5% 40.3% 59.2% 40.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 63/64 2.7 2.9 68.6% 66.9% 51.0% 52.8% 43.5% 61.9% 40.1% 2008 4/4 4.5 2.0 62.2% 68.4% 49.7% 65.1% 38.0% 61.3% 35.4%
22 2004 62/66 4.3 3.1 59.8% 71.5% 50.1% 59.9% 39.7% 63.1% 37.9% 2009 29/30 6.6 2.7 66.1% 69.8% 48.8% 54.8% 41.5% 62.4% 34.1%
23 2005 65/66 3.8 2.9 61.4% 71.2% 50.2% 58.0% 40.5% 63.0% 41.5% 2010 58/58 6.7 1.5 65.3% 70.2% 53.9% 54.2% 41.5% 64.5% 36.2%
24 2006 75/75 3.2 1.8 69.2% 68.7% 53.3% 62.1% 48.3% 63.8% 40.5% 2011 31/31 5.5 2.2 64.3% 64.3% 49.6% 56.0% 36.7% 59.3% 34.6%
25 2007 73/73 3.7 1.7 67.2% 68.6% 55.3% 58.6% 47.8% 64.1% 40.7% 2012 54/58 7.1 1.7 63.9% 70.8% 52.2% 58.0% 39.1% 64.1% 35.8%
26 2008 57/58 3.1 1.5 68.4% 69.0% 52.3% 59.2% 40.6% 63.7% 38.8% 2013 59/59 6.3 2.0 63.2% 72.0% 51.6% 64.5% 39.1% 64.4% 35.1%
27 2009 70/70 4.2 2.1 63.4% 71.5% 55.2% 61.6% 43.4% 65.5% 38.9% 2014 50/51 7.0 1.6 67.9% 72.2% 50.5% 58.6% 39.9% 65.0% 34.8%
28 2010 43/43 4.3 2.1 64.8% 69.7% 54.5% 49.4% 40.9% 63.9% 36.1% 2015 43/43 5.7 1.3 63.5% 72.5% 51.8% 58.3% 38.9% 64.8% 36.5%
29 2011 32/34 3.8 2.4 62.5% 70.7% 55.4% 61.5% 40.1% 64.9% 38.8% 2016 25/26 6.8 2.1 63.5% 69.9% 49.2% 52.9% 44.8% 62.3% 33.7%
30 2012 12/12 4.8 2.2 60.7% 70.5% 49.6% 62.9% 64.6% 62.1% 35.8% 2017 33/33 8.4 1.7 65.4% 72.3% 50.1% 59.7% 44.3% 64.7% 34.2%
31 2013 56/56 4.5 2.2 60.6% 71.6% 52.3% 59.5% 42.7% 64.0% 39.0% 2018 30/30 5.7 1.5 68.7% 71.0% 51.0% 56.5% 34.9% 64.5% 34.3%
32 2014 69/69 5.1 2.0 63.8% 74.1% 54.0% 58.1% 39.6% 66.8% 37.2% 2019 14/14 5.5 2.0 65.7% 72.4% 49.2% 56.9% 39.4% 64.5% 30.6%
33 2015 43/43 3.7 2.0 62.8% 69.8% 51.3% 57.9% 45.1% 63.1% 36.4% 2020 1/1 2.0 2.0 64.0% 65.6% 27.8% 60.0% 0.0% 52.0% 28.3%
34 2016 8/8 5.0 2.6 61.4% 65.4% 49.3% 59.3% 30.0% 58.6% 30.2% 2021 2/3 2.0 2.5 72.1% 64.6% 44.2% 50.8% — 59.2% 19.8%
35 2017 17/17 2.2 1.6 65.1% 63.1% 47.3% 60.3% 47.0% 57.5% 35.1% 2022 2/2 3.5 1.5 68.0% 69.9% 41.1% 72.2% 21.4% 60.5% 33.4%
36 2018 2/2 2.0 3.0 63.5% 76.4% 52.9% 37.5% 14.3% 67.7% 27.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 1/1 2.0 2.0 60.8% 61.3% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0% 52.9% 28.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
40 2022 1/1 0.0 1.0 64.4% 44.8% 37.5% 0.0% 0.0% 42.2% 31.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 853/878 3.7 2.3 64.7% 69.7% 52.4% 58.2% 43.2% 63.4% 38.9% — 437/445 6.5 1.8 65.1% 70.7% 51.0% 57.9% 39.5% 63.8% 34.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tommy Robredo Denis Istomin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1999 1534 111.3 -1.11 +0.08 1.149 52.8% — +25 — 44.4% -0.44 1–0 1–1 — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 1496 104.2 -0.33 -3.63 0.558 40.7% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1762 138.8 +1.70 +1.94 1.118 52.1% -113 +59 -142 59.9% +0.69 13–8 (62%) 16–10 (62%) — +1.44 2006 1474 112.2 +1.83 +2.43 0.669 43.4% — — — 16.7% -2.34 0–1 1–1 — -0.22
20 2002 1794 141.9 -1.86 +2.88 0.984 49.6% -51 +86 -168 50.0% -0.11 15–7 (68%) 11–10 (52%) — +0.25 2007 1486 103.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 1760 144.7 -0.06 +2.81 1.054 50.9% -81 +199 -70 53.8% +0.23 13–8 (62%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.05 2008 1559 115.8 -0.37 +0.78 0.914 48.9% +45 — — 50.0% -0.08 — 2–2 (50%) — +0.02
22 2004 1831 146.9 +0.42 +1.52 1.025 50.4% -13 +109 -123 56.6% +0.25 17–6 (74%) 15–11 (58%) — 0.00 2009 1636 125.3 -1.33 -1.62 0.907 48.6% +16 -133 -53 42.9% -0.57 5–2 (71%) 7–10 (41%) — +1.12
23 2005 1852 145.0 +0.69 +3.15 1.121 51.7% +8 +79 -187 58.9% +0.51 12–8 (60%) 9–8 (53%) — +1.57 2010 1768 143.4 +1.15 +0.13 1.018 50.4% -22 -228 -27 51.7% +0.19 13–12 (52%) 15–11 (58%) — -0.33
24 2006 1868 151.1 +1.63 +3.35 1.119 52.0% -22 +147 -213 62.8% +0.78 12–12 (50%) 13–11 (54%) — +1.81 2011 1666 130.3 -2.79 -1.92 0.850 47.1% +33 -165 +77 37.3% -0.88 1–5 (17%) 7–3 (70%) — -1.16
25 2007 1857 150.3 +1.34 +3.23 1.134 52.3% +18 +126 -200 61.5% +0.75 16–10 (62%) 11–12 (48%) — +3.75 2012 1751 150.1 +1.09 -0.48 0.999 50.0% -33 -229 +124 48.6% +0.04 10–10 (50%) 14–14 (50%) — -1.49
26 2008 1873 148.9 +1.00 +2.34 1.071 51.1% -73 +190 — 55.9% +0.27 8–6 (57%) 15–9 (63%) — -0.66 2013 1812 153.1 +0.94 -0.48 0.987 49.9% +15 -243 -31 50.0% +0.05 10–10 (50%) 11–13 (46%) — -0.77
27 2009 1905 153.5 +2.25 +1.71 1.126 52.0% -15 +119 -212 60.7% +0.69 14–3 (82%) 15–5 (75%) — +2.30 2014 1860 158.1 +1.45 -0.54 0.996 50.0% +1 -139 -14 52.7% +0.11 8–9 (47%) 13–14 (48%) — -3.30
28 2010 1797 144.2 +0.33 -0.22 1.000 49.7% +33 +108 — 47.0% -0.24 5–8 (38%) 7–8 (47%) — +1.62 2015 1790 143.8 +0.64 +0.10 1.036 50.5% -25 -86 +93 48.4% +0.09 3–7 (30%) 8–8 (50%) — -1.14
29 2011 1786 146.5 +1.92 +0.31 1.105 51.8% +44 +149 — 62.2% +0.76 6–2 (75%) 5–4 (56%) — +2.04 2016 1707 140.8 -0.07 -2.12 0.894 48.4% -28 -26 +126 33.8% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 5–6 (45%) — -2.01
30 2012 1768 135.0 +0.23 -0.69 0.947 49.1% +22 +146 — 51.6% -0.48 0–4 (0%) 1–0 — -0.13 2017 1723 138.9 +1.33 -1.58 0.968 49.5% +6 -29 -40 45.2% -0.31 6–4 (60%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.43
31 2013 2004 157.9 +1.54 +1.91 1.083 51.3% -155 +67 -307 58.8% +0.55 14–4 (78%) 14–9 (61%) — -0.69 2018 1679 132.6 +0.11 -1.51 0.968 49.0% -23 +18 +38 45.8% -0.11 4–6 (40%) 10–14 (42%) — -0.46
32 2014 1999 163.7 +2.95 +1.79 1.118 51.6% +11 -78 -165 59.1% +0.51 10–10 (50%) 24–20 (55%) — +0.70 2019 1576 124.0 -0.42 -1.96 0.862 47.8% +79 +78 — 25.8% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.40
33 2015 1885 151.8 -1.22 +0.52 0.987 49.7% +56 +17 -99 52.3% -0.03 10–7 (59%) 6–7 (46%) — +1.91 2020 1552 113.0 -1.58 +7.36 0.589 40.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.19
34 2016 1814 131.0 -1.43 -1.82 0.730 45.3% +32 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–1 3–3 (50%) — -0.56 2021 1538 107.3 -0.95 -2.93 0.484 41.2% — — — 12.5% -2.25 0–1 1–0 — -0.06
35 2017 1741 121.5 -3.64 -0.64 0.826 46.6% +76 -4 — 36.6% -0.83 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.84 2022 1571 110.4 -1.64 -0.13 0.846 46.2% — — — 50.0% -1.00 — 1–0 — -0.06
36 2018 1685 121.0 -3.18 +3.15 0.838 46.8% — — — 16.7% -1.34 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 1583 99.7 -0.51 -0.32 0.607 41.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 1582 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 1514 92.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2022 1503 96.1 -0.65 -5.56 0.541 36.6% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2051 153.4 +0.86 +1.96 1.064 51.0% -18 +95 -163 56.4% +0.35 169–107 (61%) 178–143 (55%) 107.1 +1.61 — 1914 147.1 +0.44 -0.79 0.963 49.4% -2 -119 +38 46.1% -0.19 63–74 (46%) 107–108 (50%) 101.5 -2.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.