H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tommy Robredo vs Dmitry Tursunov H2H: 2-2
Tommy Robredo and Dmitry Tursunov are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Dmitry Tursunov won the 2006 Mumbai semifinal 7-6(2) 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2006* | Mumbai | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Dmitry Tursunov | 7-6(2) 3-6 6-1 | Tommy Robredo | Match data |
| Jan 20, 2006* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Tommy Robredo | 7-6(4) 3-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | Dmitry Tursunov | Match data |
| Jan 12, 2006* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Dmitry Tursunov | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Tommy Robredo | Match data |
| Jan 8, 2004* | Chennai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Tommy Robredo | 7-5 6-7(2) 6-4 | Dmitry Tursunov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Robredo | #1,059 | #5 | 2,770 | 2,048 | 523 | 351 | 59.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
| Dmitry Tursunov | #815 | #20 | 2,290 | 1,914 | 223 | 215 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tommy Robredo | Dmitry Tursunov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1999 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #244 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #174 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #30 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #21 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #80 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #13 | 1,823 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #19 | 1,849 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 42–31 | 57.5% | #22 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2006 | 49–26 | 65.3% | #7 | 1,868 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #34 | 1,767 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2007 | 48–25 | 65.8% | #10 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 2008 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #22 | 1,861 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2008 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,882 | 0 | 7 | 2009 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #89 | 1,701 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2009 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #16 | 1,903 | 0 | 9 | 2010 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,705 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2010 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #50 | 1,796 | 0 | 9 | 2011 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,767 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2011 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 10 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,698 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2012 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #114 | 1,752 | 0 | 10 | 2013 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #29 | 1,868 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 2013 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #18 | 2,000 | 0 | 12 | 2014 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #110 | 1,746 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 2014 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #17 | 1,998 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #42 | 1,883 | 0 | 12 | 2016 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #411 | 1,676 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | 2016 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #358 | 1,814 | 0 | 12 | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #487 | 1,622 | 0 | 7 |
| 35 | 2017 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #164 | 1,740 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,684 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,582 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,502 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |