H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Tommy Robredo vs Fernando Verdasco H2H: 6-5

Tommy Robredo holds a 6–5 lead over Fernando Verdasco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 11 main-draw meetings, Fernando Verdasco leads 4–1 on hard courts, while Tommy Robredo leads 4–0 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Verdasco won the 2012 Valencia round of 32 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Robredo
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
6 – 5
11 main draw meetings
Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Fernando Verdasco #24 6-3 6-4 Tommy Robredo #114 Match data Oct 24, 2012* R32 Valencia ATP 500 Hard
Tommy Robredo #29 6-4 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #8 Match data Apr 13, 2011* R32 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Tommy Robredo #36 6-4 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #10 Match data Jul 17, 2010* QF Swedish Open ATP 250 Clay
Fernando Verdasco #8 6-3 6-2 Tommy Robredo #15 Match data Nov 7, 2009* QF Valencia ATP 500 Hard
Fernando Verdasco #17 6-2 6-7(6) 6-2 Tommy Robredo #19 Match data Oct 29, 2008* R32 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Tommy Robredo #15 6-3 2-6 6-2 Fernando Verdasco #32 Match data Apr 28, 2006* R16 Barcelona Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay
Fernando Verdasco #59 6-1 6-2 7-5 Tommy Robredo #14 Match data Jun 22, 2005* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Tommy Robredo #13 2-6 6-4 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #39 Match data Oct 23, 2004* R16 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Hard
Tommy Robredo #23 7-6(5) 6-2 Fernando Verdasco #41 Match data Jun 19, 2004* QF Libéma Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Tommy Robredo #26 6-4 5-7 6-4 Fernando Verdasco #54 Match data Apr 30, 2004* R16 Barcelona Open International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay
Fernando Verdasco #119 6-3 6-4 6-2 Tommy Robredo #17 Match data Aug 27, 2003* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,051 525 353 59.8% 0 1 0 1 10 12
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,127 549 442 55.4% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Robredo Fernando Verdasco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0
19 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,591 0 0
20 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,793 0 1 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,730 0 1
21 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,760 0 1 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,790 0 1
22 2004 41–25 62.1% #13 1,831 0 2 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1
23 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,851 0 2 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1
24 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,867 0 4 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,875 0 2
25 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,003 0 3
26 2008 35–23 60.3% #21 1,872 0 7 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,927 0 5
27 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,905 0 9 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,931 0 5
28 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9 2012 32–22 59.3% #24 1,901 0 5
29 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,785 0 10 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,896 0 5
30 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,768 0 10 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,879 0 6
31 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,004 0 12 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6
32 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,999 0 12 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,823 0 7
33 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,884 0 12 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7
34 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,813 0 12 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,914 0 7
35 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7
36 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7
37 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,583 0 12 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7
40 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tommy Robredo Fernando Verdasco
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1999 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
19 2001 10 7 17 58.8% 23 9 32 71.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2003 6 7 13 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2002 14 14 28 50.0% 14 7 21 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2004 6 10 16 37.5% 20 11 31 64.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2003 10 14 24 41.7% 22 8 30 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2005 14 12 26 53.8% 15 11 26 57.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
22 2004 20 12 32 62.5% 14 7 21 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2006 9 12 21 42.9% 17 9 26 65.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2005 20 11 31 64.5% 18 9 27 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2007 18 14 32 56.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
24 2006 22 16 38 57.9% 22 6 28 78.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2008 20 16 36 55.6% 17 8 25 68.0% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — —
25 2007 27 13 40 67.5% 18 9 27 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 35 15 50 70.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
26 2008 12 14 26 46.2% 21 7 28 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2010 21 13 34 61.8% 22 7 29 75.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2009 17 13 30 56.7% 27 9 36 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2011 19 14 33 57.6% 12 8 20 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 2010 15 15 30 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2012 11 10 21 52.4% 19 10 29 65.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
29 2011 8 7 15 53.3% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 9 13 22 40.9% 12 9 21 57.1% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
30 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 11 11 22 50.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 2013 9 9 18 50.0% 25 10 35 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2015 11 14 25 44.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
32 2014 25 13 38 65.8% 15 12 27 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2016 13 15 28 46.4% 14 8 22 63.6% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
33 2015 11 10 21 52.4% 11 8 19 57.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2017 18 15 33 54.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
34 2016 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 18 14 32 56.3% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
35 2017 1 2 3 33.3% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — — 2019 13 14 27 48.1% 8 9 17 47.1% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — —
36 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2020 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
37 2019 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2021 0 2 2 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
40 2022 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 226 182 408 55.4% 256 130 386 66.3% 30 24 54 55.6% 13 17 30 43.3% — 259 235 494 52.4% 231 156 387 59.7% 51 44 95 53.7% 8 7 15 53.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 853/878 of Tommy Robredo's and 988/991 of Fernando Verdasco's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tommy Robredo Fernando Verdasco
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1999 2/4 0.0 0.5 62.8% 65.2% 54.5% 55.0% 72.7% 61.7% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 2/2 0.0 3.5 63.6% 62.8% 26.7% 65.7% 16.7% 49.7% 28.1% 2002 3/3 1.7 6.3 71.8% 56.3% 32.1% 54.4% 39.3% 49.7% 37.0%
19 2001 52/57 3.5 2.9 64.8% 70.5% 51.2% 58.7% 47.5% 63.6% 40.7% 2003 18/19 5.0 4.3 64.8% 68.3% 55.7% 51.0% 42.6% 63.8% 34.4%
20 2002 48/57 1.9 2.8 68.1% 63.7% 50.6% 54.5% 40.3% 59.2% 40.1% 2004 56/56 4.8 3.2 66.0% 71.0% 56.3% 65.5% 40.6% 65.7% 37.3%
21 2003 63/64 2.7 2.9 68.6% 66.9% 51.0% 52.8% 43.5% 61.9% 40.1% 2005 61/61 6.6 3.7 65.1% 72.5% 51.7% 60.0% 44.5% 65.2% 38.9%
22 2004 62/66 4.3 3.1 59.8% 71.5% 50.1% 59.9% 39.7% 63.1% 37.9% 2006 56/56 3.9 3.8 72.5% 68.7% 49.7% 62.8% 43.6% 63.3% 38.3%
23 2005 65/66 3.8 2.9 61.4% 71.2% 50.2% 58.0% 40.5% 63.0% 41.5% 2007 59/59 4.6 3.4 72.4% 70.2% 52.2% 55.3% 38.6% 65.1% 38.2%
24 2006 75/75 3.2 1.8 69.2% 68.7% 53.3% 62.1% 48.3% 63.8% 40.5% 2008 72/72 3.8 4.1 72.6% 69.3% 53.0% 55.6% 47.6% 64.7% 40.8%
25 2007 73/73 3.7 1.7 67.2% 68.6% 55.3% 58.6% 47.8% 64.1% 40.7% 2009 75/75 6.1 3.7 69.1% 73.1% 54.3% 62.2% 46.5% 67.1% 41.1%
26 2008 57/58 3.1 1.5 68.4% 69.0% 52.3% 59.2% 40.6% 63.7% 38.8% 2010 64/64 5.4 4.8 67.1% 71.2% 49.4% 60.0% 44.6% 64.0% 40.3%
27 2009 70/70 4.2 2.1 63.4% 71.5% 55.2% 61.6% 43.4% 65.5% 38.9% 2011 58/58 5.5 3.9 68.8% 70.7% 51.3% 61.5% 44.9% 64.6% 38.1%
28 2010 43/43 4.3 2.1 64.8% 69.7% 54.5% 49.4% 40.9% 63.9% 36.1% 2012 53/54 4.6 3.8 69.7% 69.7% 51.4% 64.4% 42.1% 64.1% 38.3%
29 2011 32/34 3.8 2.4 62.5% 70.7% 55.4% 61.5% 40.1% 64.9% 38.8% 2013 50/51 5.9 5.0 61.7% 72.8% 54.0% 56.4% 36.3% 65.3% 37.4%
30 2012 12/12 4.8 2.2 60.7% 70.5% 49.6% 62.9% 64.6% 62.1% 35.8% 2014 46/46 5.7 4.7 66.3% 71.7% 51.8% 65.6% 43.2% 64.5% 37.3%
31 2013 56/56 4.5 2.2 60.6% 71.6% 52.3% 59.5% 42.7% 64.0% 39.0% 2015 50/50 7.7 4.1 64.6% 73.5% 52.3% 60.8% 35.2% 66.1% 35.3%
32 2014 69/69 5.1 2.0 63.8% 74.1% 54.0% 58.1% 39.6% 66.8% 37.2% 2016 55/55 6.3 3.9 64.0% 73.2% 51.4% 62.1% 38.4% 65.1% 37.8%
33 2015 43/43 3.7 2.0 62.8% 69.8% 51.3% 57.9% 45.1% 63.1% 36.4% 2017 54/54 4.0 3.4 69.0% 70.6% 51.0% 53.7% 45.7% 64.6% 39.5%
34 2016 8/8 5.0 2.6 61.4% 65.4% 49.3% 59.3% 30.0% 58.6% 30.2% 2018 61/61 6.7 4.2 63.1% 72.0% 48.7% 59.3% 42.9% 63.4% 39.0%
35 2017 17/17 2.2 1.6 65.1% 63.1% 47.3% 60.3% 47.0% 57.5% 35.1% 2019 53/53 7.7 3.7 63.8% 71.8% 49.4% 62.4% 40.0% 63.7% 36.0%
36 2018 2/2 2.0 3.0 63.5% 76.4% 52.9% 37.5% 14.3% 67.7% 27.0% 2020 13/13 6.3 2.6 67.5% 68.9% 49.5% 59.7% 29.5% 62.7% 36.4%
37 2019 1/1 2.0 2.0 60.8% 61.3% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0% 52.9% 28.6% 2021 10/10 3.9 3.2 66.9% 60.7% 48.4% 54.2% 28.3% 56.6% 35.0%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 16/16 4.3 2.9 63.4% 66.0% 48.6% 58.4% 37.6% 59.8% 36.2%
39 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 5/5 1.0 4.0 62.6% 53.7% 32.4% 36.3% 45.3% 45.6% 34.0%
40 2022 1/1 0.0 1.0 64.4% 44.8% 37.5% 0.0% 0.0% 42.2% 31.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 853/878 3.7 2.3 64.7% 69.7% 52.4% 58.2% 43.2% 63.4% 38.9% — 988/991 5.5 3.9 67.3% 70.9% 51.6% 59.9% 42.1% 64.4% 38.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tommy Robredo Fernando Verdasco
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1999 1534 111.3 -1.11 +0.08 1.149 52.8% — +25 — 44.4% -0.44 1–0 1–1 — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 1496 104.2 -0.33 -3.63 0.558 40.7% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.14 2002 1502 102.0 -2.56 -2.05 0.736 44.2% — +27 — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 — — +0.02
19 2001 1762 138.8 +1.70 +1.94 1.118 52.1% -113 +59 -142 59.9% +0.69 13–8 (62%) 16–10 (62%) 108.8 +1.44 2003 1592 125.8 +1.64 -0.91 0.950 48.7% +9 -89 — 39.6% -0.77 2–4 (33%) 7–7 (50%) 99.9 -0.48
20 2002 1794 141.9 -1.86 +2.88 0.984 49.6% -51 +86 -168 50.0% -0.11 15–7 (68%) 11–10 (52%) 106.3 +0.25 2004 1731 140.6 +2.76 +0.54 1.085 51.4% -84 +24 -92 53.2% +0.29 6–8 (43%) 11–12 (48%) 100.4 -1.34
21 2003 1760 144.7 -0.06 +2.81 1.054 50.9% -81 +199 -70 53.8% +0.23 13–8 (62%) 11–12 (48%) 102.8 -0.05 2005 1791 146.9 +2.51 +2.36 1.116 51.9% -27 +11 -149 55.1% +0.46 10–12 (45%) 12–11 (52%) 100.7 -2.07
22 2004 1831 146.9 +0.42 +1.52 1.025 50.4% -13 +109 -123 56.6% +0.25 17–6 (74%) 15–11 (58%) 107.9 0.00 2006 1727 137.0 +0.96 +1.48 1.042 50.6% -72 +110 +30 56.5% +0.19 10–10 (50%) 14–10 (58%) 101.8 +0.48
23 2005 1852 145.0 +0.69 +3.15 1.121 51.7% +8 +79 -187 58.9% +0.51 12–8 (60%) 9–8 (53%) 99.2 +1.57 2007 1864 150.9 +2.40 +2.23 1.097 51.3% -58 -13 -91 54.4% +0.38 11–10 (52%) 10–14 (42%) 101.0 -1.77
24 2006 1868 151.1 +1.63 +3.35 1.119 52.0% -22 +147 -213 62.8% +0.78 12–12 (50%) 13–11 (54%) 96.1 +1.81 2008 1876 151.0 +1.44 +3.82 1.154 52.4% -51 +93 +36 58.0% +0.69 13–9 (59%) 13–14 (48%) 101.8 +1.79
25 2007 1857 150.3 +1.34 +3.23 1.134 52.3% +18 +126 -200 61.5% +0.75 16–10 (62%) 11–12 (48%) 98.5 +3.75 2009 2004 172.3 +4.14 +5.15 1.247 53.9% +20 +44 -100 66.0% +1.22 11–12 (48%) 15–19 (44%) 96.0 -0.23
26 2008 1873 148.9 +1.00 +2.34 1.071 51.1% -73 +190 — 55.9% +0.27 8–6 (57%) 15–9 (63%) 103.1 -0.66 2010 1928 161.5 +1.35 +3.83 1.119 52.0% +11 +172 — 59.1% +0.69 18–5 (78%) 17–17 (50%) 104.3 +1.41
27 2009 1905 153.5 +2.25 +1.71 1.126 52.0% -15 +119 -212 60.7% +0.69 14–3 (82%) 15–5 (75%) 112.8 +2.30 2011 1931 156.9 +1.76 +2.02 1.077 51.0% -19 +115 -49 55.4% +0.39 9–9 (50%) 9–10 (47%) 97.4 -0.03
28 2010 1797 144.2 +0.33 -0.22 1.000 49.7% +33 +108 — 47.0% -0.24 5–8 (38%) 7–8 (47%) 94.3 +1.62 2012 1902 158.3 +1.78 +1.64 1.068 50.9% -15 +110 -16 57.3% +0.45 7–6 (54%) 10–11 (48%) 96.5 +0.32
29 2011 1786 146.5 +1.92 +0.31 1.105 51.8% +44 +149 — 62.2% +0.76 6–2 (75%) 5–4 (56%) 101.7 +2.04 2013 1897 150.8 +1.90 +1.27 1.077 50.9% -69 +47 +113 54.3% +0.20 11–12 (48%) 14–10 (58%) 102.3 -0.19
30 2012 1768 135.0 +0.23 -0.69 0.947 49.1% +22 +146 — 51.6% -0.48 0–4 (0%) 1–0 — -0.13 2014 1880 147.7 +0.99 +0.74 1.048 50.8% -58 +69 +74 55.4% +0.36 11–12 (48%) 12–16 (43%) 94.8 +1.67
31 2013 2004 157.9 +1.54 +1.91 1.083 51.3% -155 +67 -307 58.8% +0.55 14–4 (78%) 14–9 (61%) 113.0 -0.69 2015 1822 158.0 +2.13 -0.07 1.043 50.6% -12 +53 +115 47.4% +0.18 12–11 (52%) 13–16 (45%) 97.0 -2.42
32 2014 1999 163.7 +2.95 +1.79 1.118 51.6% +11 -78 -165 59.1% +0.51 10–10 (50%) 24–20 (55%) 101.0 +0.70 2016 1823 157.6 +1.70 +1.52 1.083 51.2% -31 +108 +59 53.3% +0.30 6–12 (33%) 15–12 (56%) 97.7 -1.95
33 2015 1885 151.8 -1.22 +0.52 0.987 49.7% +56 +17 -99 52.3% -0.03 10–7 (59%) 6–7 (46%) 98.5 +1.91 2017 1896 164.3 +0.98 +3.38 1.115 51.7% -12 +46 -99 55.4% +0.30 6–15 (29%) 18–9 (67%) 98.6 -2.48
34 2016 1814 131.0 -1.43 -1.82 0.730 45.3% +32 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–1 3–3 (50%) — -0.56 2018 1915 159.9 -0.10 +2.46 1.065 50.9% +25 +13 -172 51.9% +0.27 15–11 (58%) 8–17 (32%) 94.6 -1.33
35 2017 1741 121.5 -3.64 -0.64 0.826 46.6% +76 -4 — 36.6% -0.83 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.84 2019 1810 151.6 -0.18 +0.45 0.990 50.1% +22 +37 +5 51.4% +0.28 13–13 (50%) 8–11 (42%) 96.5 -0.47
36 2018 1685 121.0 -3.18 +3.15 0.838 46.8% — — — 16.7% -1.34 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.31 2020 1768 132.5 -0.34 -1.01 0.975 49.0% +72 — — 48.5% -0.27 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — -0.38
37 2019 1583 99.7 -0.51 -0.32 0.607 41.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.30 2021 1627 114.6 -2.83 -1.10 0.807 46.0% — +81 — 25.0% -1.25 — 1–2 (33%) — -0.25
38 2020 1582 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1604 122.9 -3.29 -0.30 0.900 48.1% +74 +90 — 36.6% -0.81 2–4 (33%) 5–5 (50%) 98.8 +0.75
39 2021 1514 92.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1536 96.8 -6.12 -1.90 0.625 40.2% +105 — — 9.1% -3.27 0–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.03
40 2022 1503 96.1 -0.65 -5.56 0.541 36.6% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2051 153.4 +0.86 +1.96 1.064 51.0% -18 +95 -163 56.4% +0.35 169–107 (61%) 178–143 (55%) 107.1 +1.61 — 2128 158.8 +1.50 +2.00 1.077 51.2% -17 +67 -9 54.3% +0.35 175–178 (50%) 214–226 (49%) 97.0 -0.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.