H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tommy Robredo vs Greg Rusedski H2H: 2-1
Tommy Robredo holds a 2–1 lead over Greg Rusedski in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tommy Robredo leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Greg Rusedski leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 2006 Rome Masters second round 5-7 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 52
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2006* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Greg Rusedski | 5-7 6-3 6-4 | Tommy Robredo | Match data |
| Aug 7, 2004* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Tommy Robredo | 7-6(4) 7-6(2) | Greg Rusedski | Match data |
| Aug 8, 2002* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Tommy Robredo | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Greg Rusedski | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Robredo | #1,059 | #5 | 2,770 | 2,048 | 523 | 351 | 59.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
| Greg Rusedski | #944 | #4 | 3,094 | 2,049 | 415 | 276 | 60.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tommy Robredo | Greg Rusedski | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1999 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #244 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #30 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2002 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 21–29 | 42.0% | #114 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2003 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #21 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2004 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #13 | 1,823 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #48 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2005 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #19 | 1,849 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #6 | 1,950 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2006 | 49–26 | 65.3% | #7 | 1,868 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #9 | 2,011 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2007 | 48–25 | 65.8% | #10 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #14 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 2008 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,882 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,802 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 2009 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #16 | 1,903 | 0 | 9 | 2001 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #31 | 1,807 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2010 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #50 | 1,796 | 0 | 9 | 2002 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #31 | 1,904 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 2011 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 10 | 2003 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #119 | 1,825 | 0 | 13 |
| 30 | 2012 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #114 | 1,752 | 0 | 10 | 2004 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #46 | 1,819 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | 2013 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #18 | 2,000 | 0 | 12 | 2005 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #37 | 1,780 | 0 | 15 |
| 32 | 2014 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #17 | 1,998 | 0 | 12 | 2006 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #191 | 1,638 | 0 | 15 |
| 33 | 2015 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #42 | 1,883 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #358 | 1,814 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #164 | 1,740 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,684 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,582 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,502 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |