H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Tommy Robredo vs Gustavo Kuerten H2H: 4-1

Tommy Robredo holds a 4–1 lead over Gustavo Kuerten in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Tommy Robredo leads 3–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Robredo won the 2005 US Open second round 5-7 7-6(3) 6-3 6-2.

ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
BRA Age 49 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 2, 2005* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Tommy Robredo #20 5-7 7-6(3) 6-3 6-2 Gustavo Kuerten #357 Match data
Jul 28, 2005* Umag ATP 250 R32 Clay Tommy Robredo #16 6-4 6-4 Gustavo Kuerten #202 Match data
May 12, 2005* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Tommy Robredo #16 6-3 6-0 Gustavo Kuerten #110 Match data
Jun 4, 2003* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Tommy Robredo #31 6-4 1-6 7-6(2) 6-4 Gustavo Kuerten #16 Match data
Jul 20, 2001* Stuttgart ATP 250 R16 Clay Gustavo Kuerten #1 6-4 6-1 Tommy Robredo #52 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,048 523 351 59.8% 0 1 0 0 11 12
Gustavo Kuerten #1,132 #1 4,750 2,140 336 182 64.9% 3 5 1 0 11 20

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Robredo Gustavo Kuerten
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0
19 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1 1996 8–10 44.4% #88 1,556 0 0
20 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,794 0 1 1997 34–23 59.6% #14 1,779 1 1
21 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,761 0 1 1998 39–24 61.9% #23 1,781 1 3
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #13 1,823 0 2 1999 47–24 66.2% #5 1,860 1 5
23 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,849 0 2 2000 59–18 76.6% #1 2,012 2 10
24 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,868 0 4 2001 57–17 77.0% #2 1,915 3 16
25 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6 2002 24–14 63.2% #37 1,874 3 17
26 2008 35–22 61.4% #21 1,882 0 7 2003 40–19 67.8% #16 1,854 3 19
27 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,903 0 9 2004 23–12 65.7% #40 1,834 3 20
28 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9 2005 3–9 25.0% #291 1,714 3 20
29 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,760 0 10 2006 0–1 0.0% #1078 1,689 3 20
30 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,752 0 10 2007 2–7 22.2% #680 1,601 3 20
31 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,000 0 12 2008 0–4 0.0% #1150 1,560 3 20
32 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,998 0 12
33 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,883 0 12
34 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,814 0 12
35 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12
36 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12
37 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,582 0 12
40 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12