H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Tommy Robredo vs Ivan Dodig H2H: 1-1
Tommy Robredo and Ivan Dodig are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tommy Robredo leads 1–0 on clay, while Ivan Dodig leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Robredo won the 2011 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2011* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Tommy Robredo | 6-4 6-2 | Ivan Dodig | Match data |
| Oct 21, 2010* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Ivan Dodig | 6-3 6-2 | Tommy Robredo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Robredo | #1,059 | #5 | 2,770 | 2,048 | 523 | 351 | 59.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
| Ivan Dodig | #423 | #29 | 1,330 | 1,964 | 114 | 129 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tommy Robredo | Ivan Dodig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1999 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #244 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #30 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2003 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #21 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #13 | 1,823 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #19 | 1,849 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #422 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 49–26 | 65.3% | #7 | 1,868 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 48–25 | 65.8% | #10 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,882 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2009 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #16 | 1,903 | 0 | 9 | 2012 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2010 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #50 | 1,796 | 0 | 9 | 2013 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #33 | 1,916 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2011 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 10 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #95 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2012 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #114 | 1,752 | 0 | 10 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #87 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2013 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #18 | 2,000 | 0 | 12 | 2016 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #147 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2014 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #17 | 1,998 | 0 | 12 | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #336 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2015 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #42 | 1,883 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #358 | 1,814 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #164 | 1,740 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,684 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,582 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,502 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |