H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tommy Robredo vs Ivo Minar H2H: 3-0
Tommy Robredo holds a 3–0 lead over Ivo Minar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tommy Robredo leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tommy Robredo won the 2008 Beijing fourth round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 42
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2008* | Beijing | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Tommy Robredo | 6-2 6-3 | Ivo Minar | Match data |
| Aug 3, 2006* | Sopot | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Tommy Robredo | 7-6(5) 3-6 6-4 | Ivo Minar | Match data |
| Oct 14, 2005* | Vienna | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Tommy Robredo | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Ivo Minar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Robredo | #1,059 | #5 | 2,770 | 2,048 | 523 | 351 | 59.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
| Ivo Minar | #1,784 | #62 | 950 | 1,716 | 33 | 64 | 34.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tommy Robredo | Ivo Minar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1999 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #244 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #30 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #157 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #21 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #73 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #13 | 1,823 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 1–14 | 6.7% | #159 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #19 | 1,849 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #103 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 49–26 | 65.3% | #7 | 1,868 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 48–25 | 65.8% | #10 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 2009 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #139 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,882 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2009 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #16 | 1,903 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #50 | 1,796 | 0 | 9 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #189 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #114 | 1,752 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #18 | 2,000 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #17 | 1,998 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #42 | 1,883 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #358 | 1,814 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #164 | 1,740 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,684 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,582 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,502 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |