H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Tommy Robredo vs James Blake H2H: 3-3

Tommy Robredo and James Blake are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Robredo won the 2009 US Open third round 7-6(2) 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Robredo
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
James Blake
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 6, 2009* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Tommy Robredo #15 7-6(2) 6-4 6-4 James Blake #23 Match data
Nov 13, 2006 Masters Cup ATP Finals RR Hard Tommy Robredo #6 6-2 3-6 7-5 James Blake #8 Match data
Mar 9, 2006* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard James Blake #14 6-2 7-5 Tommy Robredo #19 Match data
Jan 22, 2006* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Tommy Robredo #19 6-3 6-4 6-4 James Blake #22 Match data
Sep 7, 2005* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard James Blake #49 4-6 7-5 6-2 6-3 Tommy Robredo #20 Match data
Aug 22, 2003* Long Island ATP 250 R16 Hard James Blake #41 6-3 6-4 Tommy Robredo #17 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,048 523 351 59.8% 0 1 0 0 11 12
James Blake #1,020 #4 3,550 2,048 345 235 59.5% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Robredo James Blake
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #682 1,491 0 0
19 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1 1999 1–4 20.0% #219 1,479 0 0
20 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,794 0 1 2000 0–4 0.0% #212 1,452 0 0
21 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,761 0 1 2001 11–9 55.0% #73 1,647 0 0
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #13 1,823 0 2 2002 34–22 60.7% #28 1,815 0 1
23 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,849 0 2 2003 30–23 56.6% #37 1,796 0 1
24 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,868 0 4 2004 15–13 53.6% #97 1,692 0 1
25 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6 2005 34–20 63.0% #23 1,924 0 3
26 2008 35–22 61.4% #21 1,882 0 7 2006 57–21 73.1% #4 2,000 0 8
27 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,903 0 9 2007 49–21 70.0% #13 1,911 0 10
28 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9 2008 40–20 66.7% #10 1,888 0 10
29 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,760 0 10 2009 23–18 56.1% #44 1,848 0 10
30 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,752 0 10 2010 15–17 46.9% #135 1,759 0 10
31 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,000 0 12 2011 19–16 54.3% #59 1,841 0 10
32 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,998 0 12 2012 8–12 40.0% #127 1,788 0 10
33 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,883 0 12 2013 9–14 39.1% #153 1,714 0 10
34 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,814 0 12 — — — — — — —
35 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,582 0 12 — — — — — — —
40 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12 — — — — — — —