H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Tommy Robredo vs Jarkko Nieminen H2H: 7-1

Tommy Robredo holds a 7–1 lead over Jarkko Nieminen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Tommy Robredo leads 4–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Tommy Robredo won the 2012 Tokyo third round 6-2 6-4.

ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
7 1
8 main draw meetings
FIN Age 44 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 4, 2012* Tokyo ATP 500 R32 Hard Tommy Robredo #125 6-2 6-4 Jarkko Nieminen #35 Match data
Aug 11, 2010* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tommy Robredo #38 6-1 6-4 Jarkko Nieminen #60 Match data
Jul 12, 2008* Bastad ATP 250 QF Clay Tommy Robredo #17 6-2 7-6(4) Jarkko Nieminen #29 Match data
Aug 16, 2007* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #28 6-4 6-1 Tommy Robredo #7 Match data
Nov 5, 2006* Paris Masters Masters 1000 QF Carpet Tommy Robredo #7 6-7(4) 7-6(4) 6-4 Jarkko Nieminen #17 Match data
Jul 15, 2006* Bastad ATP 250 SF Clay Tommy Robredo #9 3-6 6-2 6-4 Jarkko Nieminen #13 Match data
Mar 12, 2003* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tommy Robredo #27 6-2 0-1 (ret.) Jarkko Nieminen #34 Match data
Oct 10, 2002* Vienna ATP 250 R32 Hard Tommy Robredo #36 6-3 6-3 Jarkko Nieminen #35 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,048 523 351 59.8% 0 1 0 0 11 12
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,917 357 334 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Robredo Jarkko Nieminen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0
19 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0
20 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,794 0 1 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0
21 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,761 0 1 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,728 0 0
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #13 1,823 0 2 2004 17–16 51.5% #77 1,696 0 0
23 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,849 0 2 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,797 0 0
24 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,868 0 4 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,789 0 1
25 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,814 0 1
26 2008 35–22 61.4% #21 1,882 0 7 2008 24–26 48.0% #37 1,758 0 1
27 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,903 0 9 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,712 0 1
28 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,873 0 1
29 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,760 0 10 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,830 0 1
30 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,752 0 10 2012 23–26 46.9% #41 1,744 0 2
31 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,000 0 12 2013 27–26 50.9% #39 1,789 0 2
32 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,998 0 12 2014 23–25 47.9% #73 1,767 0 2
33 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,883 0 12 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,692 0 2
34 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,814 0 12
35 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12
36 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12
37 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,582 0 12
40 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12