H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Tommy Robredo vs Juan Ignacio Chela H2H: 5-1

Tommy Robredo holds a 5–1 lead over Juan Ignacio Chela in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Tommy Robredo leads 4–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Robredo won the 2009 Buenos Aires fourth round 6-2 3-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Robredo
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Juan Ignacio Chela
ARG Age 46 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 20, 2009* Buenos Aires ATP 250 R16 Clay Tommy Robredo #17 6-2 3-6 6-4 Juan Ignacio Chela #136 Match data
Feb 7, 2009* Vina Del Mar ATP 250 QF Clay Tommy Robredo #19 0-6 6-3 6-4 Juan Ignacio Chela #147 Match data
May 7, 2008* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Tommy Robredo #16 6-4 6-1 Juan Ignacio Chela #36 Match data
Oct 19, 2006* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Tommy Robredo #8 7-6(2) 7-6(3) Juan Ignacio Chela #35 Match data
Jul 29, 2004* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Juan Ignacio Chela #17 6-4 6-0 Tommy Robredo #27 Match data
May 8, 2003* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Tommy Robredo #19 6-2 6-0 Juan Ignacio Chela #33 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,048 523 351 59.8% 0 1 0 0 11 12
Juan Ignacio Chela #967 #15 1,510 1,909 306 268 53.3% 0 0 0 1 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Robredo Juan Ignacio Chela
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1 1999 0–3 0.0% #124 1,463 0 0
20 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,794 0 1 2000 13–15 46.4% #63 1,540 0 1
21 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,761 0 1 2001 10–10 50.0% #70 1,594 0 1
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #13 1,823 0 2 2002 44–27 62.0% #23 1,783 0 2
23 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,849 0 2 2003 35–27 56.5% #38 1,762 0 2
24 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,868 0 4 2004 33–25 56.9% #26 1,735 0 3
25 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6 2005 28–26 51.9% #39 1,691 0 3
26 2008 35–22 61.4% #21 1,882 0 7 2006 27–26 50.9% #33 1,721 0 3
27 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,903 0 9 2007 39–23 62.9% #20 1,796 0 4
28 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9 2008 11–12 47.8% #140 1,737 0 4
29 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,760 0 10 2009 9–14 39.1% #73 1,731 0 4
30 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,752 0 10 2010 28–24 53.8% #38 1,835 0 6
31 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,000 0 12 2011 24–24 50.0% #29 1,737 0 6
32 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,998 0 12 2012 5–12 29.4% #176 1,634 0 6
33 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,883 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,814 0 12 — — — — — — —
35 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,582 0 12 — — — — — — —
40 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12 — — — — — — —