H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Tommy Robredo vs Juan Monaco H2H: 3-3

Tommy Robredo and Juan Monaco are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on clay. Most recently, Tommy Robredo won the 2014 Rome Masters second round 7-6(3) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Robredo
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Juan Monaco
ARG Age 42 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 13, 2014* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Tommy Robredo #18 7-6(3) 6-4 Juan Monaco #54 Match data
Jul 18, 2009* Bastad ATP 250 SF Clay Juan Monaco #61 6-0 6-2 Tommy Robredo #16 Match data
Apr 15, 2009* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Juan Monaco #60 6-2 6-4 Tommy Robredo #14 Match data
Feb 22, 2009* Buenos Aires ATP 250 F Clay Tommy Robredo #17 7-5 2-6 7-6(5) Juan Monaco #67 Match data
Jun 14, 2008* Warsaw ATP 250 SF Clay Tommy Robredo #19 6-4 6-4 Juan Monaco #21 Match data
Jul 28, 2007* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 QF Clay Juan Monaco #32 6-2 2-6 6-2 Tommy Robredo #7 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,048 523 351 59.8% 0 1 0 0 11 12
Juan Monaco #226 #10 2,775 2,046 319 256 55.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Robredo Juan Monaco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,794 0 1 2004 16–12 57.1% #73 1,661 0 0
21 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,761 0 1 2005 18–25 41.9% #85 1,587 0 0
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #13 1,823 0 2 2006 18–23 43.9% #69 1,641 0 0
23 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,849 0 2 2007 41–19 68.3% #23 1,864 0 3
24 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,868 0 4 2008 27–20 57.4% #46 1,768 0 3
25 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6 2009 34–24 58.6% #30 1,850 0 3
26 2008 35–22 61.4% #21 1,882 0 7 2010 28–18 60.9% #26 1,838 0 3
27 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,903 0 9 2011 26–24 52.0% #26 1,932 0 3
28 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9 2012 36–17 67.9% #12 1,944 0 7
29 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,760 0 10 2013 18–21 46.2% #42 1,809 0 7
30 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,752 0 10 2014 20–18 52.6% #62 1,856 0 7
31 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,000 0 12 2015 21–19 52.5% #53 1,811 0 7
32 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,998 0 12 2016 16–13 55.2% #65 1,864 0 8
33 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,883 0 12 2017 0–3 0.0% #226 1,805 0 8
34 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,814 0 12 — — — — — — —
35 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,582 0 12 — — — — — — —
40 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12 — — — — — — —