H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Tommy Robredo vs Lukas Rosol H2H: 2-1
Tommy Robredo holds a 2–1 lead over Lukas Rosol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tommy Robredo leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Lukas Rosol leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lukas Rosol won the 2014 Hamburg fourth round 7-5 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2014* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | R16 | Clay | Lukas Rosol | 7-5 7-6(6) | Tommy Robredo | Match data |
| Jan 15, 2014* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Tommy Robredo | 6-1 6-7(7) 3-6 7-6(5) 8-6 | Lukas Rosol | Match data |
| Sep 1, 2010* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Tommy Robredo | 6-4 6-3 6-1 | Lukas Rosol | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Robredo | #1,059 | #5 | 2,770 | 2,048 | 523 | 351 | 59.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
| Lukas Rosol | #1,777 | #26 | 1,290 | 1,921 | 110 | 148 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tommy Robredo | Lukas Rosol | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1999 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #244 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #30 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2003 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #21 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #13 | 1,823 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #19 | 1,849 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 49–26 | 65.3% | #7 | 1,868 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 48–25 | 65.8% | #10 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #70 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,882 | 0 | 7 | 2012 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #73 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #16 | 1,903 | 0 | 9 | 2013 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #47 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2010 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #50 | 1,796 | 0 | 9 | 2014 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #31 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2011 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 10 | 2015 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #55 | 1,846 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2012 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #114 | 1,752 | 0 | 10 | 2016 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #113 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2013 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #18 | 2,000 | 0 | 12 | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #203 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2014 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #17 | 1,998 | 0 | 12 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #142 | 1,703 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2015 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #42 | 1,883 | 0 | 12 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #180 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2016 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #358 | 1,814 | 0 | 12 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,658 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | 2017 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #164 | 1,740 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,684 | 0 | 12 | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| 37 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,582 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,502 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |