H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Tommy Robredo vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 1-1
Tommy Robredo and Lukasz Kubot are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tommy Robredo leads 1–0 on clay, while Lukasz Kubot leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lukasz Kubot won the 2012 Winston-Salem second round 6-1 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2012* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Lukasz Kubot | 6-1 2-6 6-2 | Tommy Robredo | Match data |
| Aug 2, 2007* | Sopot | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Tommy Robredo | 6-4 5-7 7-5 | Lukasz Kubot | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Robredo | #1,059 | #5 | 2,770 | 2,048 | 523 | 351 | 59.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
| Lukasz Kubot | #1,054 | #41 | 977 | 1,870 | 82 | 118 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Tommy Robredo | Lukasz Kubot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1999 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #244 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #30 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #125 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #21 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #13 | 1,823 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #19 | 1,849 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 49–26 | 65.3% | #7 | 1,868 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #74 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 48–25 | 65.8% | #10 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 2013 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #72 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,882 | 0 | 7 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #170 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #16 | 1,903 | 0 | 9 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #471 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #50 | 1,796 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #114 | 1,752 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #18 | 2,000 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #17 | 1,998 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #42 | 1,883 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #358 | 1,814 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #164 | 1,740 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,684 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,582 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,502 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |