H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tommy Robredo vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 3-3

Tommy Robredo and Marcos Baghdatis are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Tommy Robredo leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tommy Robredo won the 2015 St. Petersburg fourth round 7-6(5) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Robredo
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Marcos Baghdatis
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 25, 2015* St. Petersburg ATP 250 R16 Hard Tommy Robredo #27 7-6(5) 6-1 Marcos Baghdatis #52 Match data
May 7, 2013* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Tommy Robredo #36 6-4 6-2 Marcos Baghdatis #38 Match data
Mar 18, 2010* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Tommy Robredo #23 7-5 0-6 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #33 Match data
Jun 17, 2009* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 R32 Grass Marcos Baghdatis #95 7-5 6-2 Tommy Robredo #15 Match data
Nov 3, 2007* Paris Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Marcos Baghdatis #22 6-4 6-4 Tommy Robredo #8 Match data
Jan 23, 2005* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Marcos Baghdatis #155 7-6(2) 6-4 6-1 Tommy Robredo #13 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,048 523 351 59.8% 0 1 0 0 11 12
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 324 272 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Robredo Marcos Baghdatis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1 2004 1–1 50.0% #159 1,559 0 0
20 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,794 0 1 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,694 0 0
21 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,761 0 1 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #13 1,823 0 2 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,937 0 2
23 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,849 0 2 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,815 0 2
24 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,868 0 4 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,810 0 3
25 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,852 0 4
26 2008 35–22 61.4% #21 1,882 0 7 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4
27 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,903 0 9 2012 31–24 56.4% #36 1,897 0 4
28 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,804 0 4
29 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,760 0 10 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,703 0 4
30 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,752 0 10 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,869 0 4
31 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,000 0 12 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4
32 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,998 0 12 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4
33 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,883 0 12 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,723 0 4
34 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,814 0 12 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,740 0 4
35 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,582 0 12 — — — — — — —
40 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12 — — — — — — —