H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Tommy Robredo vs Mardy Fish H2H: 5-2

Tommy Robredo holds a 5–2 lead over Mardy Fish in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Tommy Robredo leads 4–2 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tommy Robredo won the 2011 Australian Open second round 1-6 6-3 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Robredo
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
5 – 2
7 main draw meetings
Mardy Fish
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 20, 2011* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Tommy Robredo #52 1-6 6-3 6-3 6-3 Mardy Fish #17 Match data
May 13, 2009* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Tommy Robredo #17 3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 Mardy Fish #26 Match data
Jul 30, 2008* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tommy Robredo #16 6-2 6-2 Mardy Fish #40 Match data
Jan 17, 2008* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Mardy Fish #43 6-1 6-2 6-3 Tommy Robredo #12 Match data
Aug 30, 2007* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Tommy Robredo #8 6-4 3-6 6-4 6-7(7) 6-4 Mardy Fish #40 Match data
Mar 3, 2006* Las Vegas ATP 250 R16 Hard Tommy Robredo #18 6-4 6-4 Mardy Fish #322 Match data
Oct 16, 2003* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Mardy Fish #25 7-6(14) 6-2 Tommy Robredo #17 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,048 523 351 59.8% 0 1 0 0 11 12
Mardy Fish #619 #7 3,060 2,114 290 211 57.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Robredo Mardy Fish
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0 2000 3–4 42.9% #305 1,524 0 0
19 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1 2001 5–8 38.5% #141 1,542 0 0
20 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,794 0 1 2002 11–11 50.0% #84 1,630 0 0
21 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,761 0 1 2003 38–23 62.3% #20 1,841 0 1
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #13 1,823 0 2 2004 21–17 55.3% #37 1,728 0 1
23 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,849 0 2 2005 6–11 35.3% #225 1,625 0 1
24 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,868 0 4 2006 23–18 56.1% #47 1,729 0 2
25 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6 2007 24–21 53.3% #39 1,756 0 2
26 2008 35–22 61.4% #21 1,882 0 7 2008 32–23 58.2% #24 1,854 0 2
27 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,903 0 9 2009 21–17 55.3% #55 1,789 0 3
28 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9 2010 38–15 71.7% #16 2,009 0 5
29 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,760 0 10 2011 42–22 65.6% #8 2,012 0 6
30 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,752 0 10 2012 20–12 62.5% #27 2,008 0 6
31 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,000 0 12 2013 4–5 44.4% #373 1,932 0 6
32 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,998 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,883 0 12 2015 2–4 33.3% #423 1,882 0 6
34 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,814 0 12 — — — — — — —
35 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,582 0 12 — — — — — — —
40 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12 — — — — — — —