H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tommy Robredo vs Mark Philippoussis H2H: 1-1
Tommy Robredo and Mark Philippoussis are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tommy Robredo leads 1–0 on clay, while Mark Philippoussis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 2006 San Jose third round 3-6 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2006* | San Jose | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Mark Philippoussis | 3-6 7-5 7-5 | Tommy Robredo | Match data |
| May 5, 2004* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Tommy Robredo | 6-2 4-6 6-4 | Mark Philippoussis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Robredo | #1,059 | #5 | 2,770 | 2,048 | 523 | 351 | 59.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
| Mark Philippoussis | #1,115 | #8 | 2,296 | 2,022 | 287 | 190 | 60.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tommy Robredo | Mark Philippoussis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1999 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #244 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #30 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2002 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 43–18 | 70.5% | #18 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 2003 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #21 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,906 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2004 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #13 | 1,823 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2005 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #19 | 1,849 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 2006 | 49–26 | 65.3% | #7 | 1,868 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #104 | 1,803 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 2007 | 48–25 | 65.8% | #10 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,772 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 2008 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,882 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #9 | 1,881 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 2009 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #16 | 1,903 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #109 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2010 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #50 | 1,796 | 0 | 9 | 2005 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #171 | 1,659 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2011 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 10 | 2006 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #114 | 1,732 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2012 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #114 | 1,752 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #18 | 2,000 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #17 | 1,998 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #42 | 1,883 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #358 | 1,814 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #164 | 1,740 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,684 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,582 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,502 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |