H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tommy Robredo vs Mikhail Youzhny H2H: 3-2

Tommy Robredo holds a 3–2 lead over Mikhail Youzhny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Tommy Robredo leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tommy Robredo won the 2015 St. Petersburg third round 6-4 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Robredo
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 24, 2015* St. Petersburg ATP 250 R32 Hard Tommy Robredo #27 6-4 3-6 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #92 Match data
Sep 7, 2010* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #14 7-5 6-2 4-6 6-4 Tommy Robredo #41 Match data
Sep 6, 2006* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #54 6-2 6-0 6-1 Tommy Robredo #5 Match data
Jul 9, 2005* Bastad ATP 250 QF Clay Tommy Robredo #20 3-6 6-4 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #27 Match data
Feb 21, 2002* Rotterdam ATP 250 R32 Hard Tommy Robredo #34 6-2 6-4 Mikhail Youzhny #69 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,048 523 351 59.8% 0 1 0 0 11 12
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Robredo Mikhail Youzhny
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0
19 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0
20 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,794 0 1 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1
21 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,761 0 1 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #13 1,823 0 2 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2
23 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,849 0 2 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2
24 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,868 0 4 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2
25 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3
26 2008 35–22 61.4% #21 1,882 0 7 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4
27 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,903 0 9 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5
28 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7
29 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,760 0 10 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7
30 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,752 0 10 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8
31 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,000 0 12 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10
32 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,998 0 12 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10
33 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,883 0 12 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10
34 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,814 0 12 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10
35 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10
36 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10
37 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,582 0 12 — — — — — — —
40 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12 — — — — — — —