H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tommy Robredo vs Nicolas Almagro H2H: 1-8

Nicolas Almagro holds a 8–1 lead over Tommy Robredo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Almagro leads 7–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Almagro won the 2017 Madrid Masters second round 6-3 3-6 6-1.

ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 8
9 main draw meetings
ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 9, 2017* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Nicolas Almagro #76 6-3 3-6 6-1 Tommy Robredo #266 Match data
Feb 28, 2015* Buenos Aires ATP 250 QF Clay Nicolas Almagro #89 6-3 6-2 Tommy Robredo #18 Match data
Feb 13, 2015* Sao Paulo ATP 250 R16 Clay Nicolas Almagro #82 6-3 7-6(1) Tommy Robredo #17 Match data
Jun 4, 2013* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Tommy Robredo #34 6-7(5) 3-6 6-4 6-4 6-4 Nicolas Almagro #13 Match data
Feb 28, 2013* Acapulco ATP 500 R16 Clay Nicolas Almagro #12 6-4 7-6(4) Tommy Robredo #79 Match data
Oct 12, 2011* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Nicolas Almagro #11 7-5 6-3 Tommy Robredo #46 Match data
Feb 19, 2011* Buenos Aires ATP 250 SF Clay Nicolas Almagro #13 7-5 6-1 Tommy Robredo #32 Match data
Jul 17, 2010* Bastad ATP 250 SF Clay Nicolas Almagro #20 6-1 6-3 Tommy Robredo #36 Match data
May 17, 2007* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Nicolas Almagro #52 6-7(1) 6-2 6-4 Tommy Robredo #7 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,048 523 351 59.8% 0 1 0 0 11 12
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,076 385 272 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Robredo Nicolas Almagro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0
19 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0
20 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,794 0 1 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1
21 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,761 0 1 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #13 1,823 0 2 2008 34–16 68.0% #18 1,794 0 4
23 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,849 0 2 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,831 0 5
24 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,868 0 4 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,885 0 7
25 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,874 0 10
26 2008 35–22 61.4% #21 1,882 0 7 2012 51–21 70.8% #11 2,010 0 12
27 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,903 0 9 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,961 0 12
28 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,928 0 12
29 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,760 0 10 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12
30 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,752 0 10 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,790 0 13
31 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,000 0 12 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,833 0 13
32 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,998 0 12 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,777 0 13
33 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,883 0 12
34 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,814 0 12
35 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12
36 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12
37 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,582 0 12
40 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12