H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Tommy Robredo vs Nicolas Mahut H2H: 3-2

Tommy Robredo holds a 3–2 lead over Nicolas Mahut in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Mahut leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Tommy Robredo leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicolas Mahut won the 2014 Winston-Salem third round 6-1 7-6(0).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Robredo
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Nicolas Mahut
FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 28, 2018* US Open Grand Slam Q3 Q Hard Tommy Robredo #214 6-3 2-6 6-3 Nicolas Mahut #131 Match data
Aug 20, 2014* Winston-Salem ATP 250 R32 Hard Nicolas Mahut #104 6-1 7-6(0) Tommy Robredo #18 Match data
Jun 27, 2013* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Tommy Robredo #29 7-6(3) 6-1 7-6(5) Nicolas Mahut #124 Match data
May 8, 2008* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Tommy Robredo #16 7-5 7-6(5) Nicolas Mahut #44 Match data
Feb 21, 2008* Rotterdam ATP 500 R32 Hard Nicolas Mahut #40 7-5 6-4 Tommy Robredo #17 Match data
Oct 6, 2007* Metz ATP 250 SF Hard Tommy Robredo #9 7-5 4-6 6-4 Nicolas Mahut #63 Match data
May 30, 2000* Roland Garros Grand Slam Q2 Q Clay Nicolas Mahut #644 7-6(3) 2-6 6-1 Tommy Robredo #204 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,048 523 351 59.8% 0 1 0 0 11 12
Nicolas Mahut #1,433 #37 1,122 1,926 179 224 44.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Robredo Nicolas Mahut
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0 2000 0–2 0.0% #388 1,516 0 0
19 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1 2001 1–4 20.0% #216 1,498 0 0
20 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,794 0 1 2002 0–1 0.0% #269 1,445 0 0
21 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,761 0 1 2003 3–6 33.3% #94 1,538 0 0
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #13 1,823 0 2 2004 3–10 23.1% #131 1,545 0 0
23 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,849 0 2 2005 1–5 16.7% #134 1,467 0 0
24 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,868 0 4 2006 11–19 36.7% #66 1,581 0 0
25 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6 2007 22–20 52.4% #45 1,732 0 0
26 2008 35–22 61.4% #21 1,882 0 7 2008 16–26 38.1% #94 1,644 0 0
27 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,903 0 9 2009 4–4 50.0% #214 1,633 0 0
28 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9 2010 3–7 30.0% #132 1,662 0 0
29 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,760 0 10 2011 11–12 47.8% #80 1,765 0 0
30 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,752 0 10 2012 16–18 47.1% #108 1,754 0 0
31 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,000 0 12 2013 17–7 70.8% #50 1,851 0 2
32 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,998 0 12 2014 14–23 37.8% #117 1,666 0 2
33 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,883 0 12 2015 11–10 52.4% #71 1,767 0 3
34 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,814 0 12 2016 23–20 53.5% #39 1,869 0 4
35 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12 2017 14–19 42.4% #103 1,753 0 4
36 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12 2018 5–8 38.5% #190 1,707 0 4
37 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,582 0 12 2019 4–3 57.1% #194 1,707 0 4
40 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12 — — — — — — —