H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tommy Robredo vs Nikolay Davydenko H2H: 2-5

Nikolay Davydenko holds a 5–2 lead over Tommy Robredo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Nikolay Davydenko leads 3–2 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2008 Warsaw final 6-3 6-3.

ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 5
7 main draw meetings
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 15, 2008* Warsaw ATP 250 F Clay Nikolay Davydenko #4 6-3 6-3 Tommy Robredo #19 Match data
May 9, 2008* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Tommy Robredo #16 4-6 6-2 7-6(4) Nikolay Davydenko #4 Match data
May 12, 2007* Rome Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Nikolay Davydenko #4 1-6 6-3 6-3 Tommy Robredo #7 Match data
Nov 13, 2006 Masters Cup ATP Finals RR Hard Nikolay Davydenko #3 7-6(8) 3-6 6-1 Tommy Robredo #6 Match data
Nov 5, 2006* Paris Masters Masters 1000 SF Carpet Nikolay Davydenko #5 6-3 5-7 6-2 Tommy Robredo #7 Match data
Jul 16, 2006* Bastad ATP 250 F Clay Tommy Robredo #9 6-2 6-1 Nikolay Davydenko #5 Match data
Jun 3, 2005* Roland Garros Grand Slam QF Clay Nikolay Davydenko #12 3-6 6-1 6-2 4-6 6-4 Tommy Robredo #16 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,048 523 351 59.8% 0 1 0 0 11 12
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Robredo Nikolay Davydenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0
19 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0
20 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,794 0 1 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0
21 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,761 0 1 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #13 1,823 0 2 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2
23 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,849 0 2 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4
24 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,868 0 4 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5
25 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10
26 2008 35–22 61.4% #21 1,882 0 7 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11
27 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,903 0 9 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14
28 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19
29 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,760 0 10 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20
30 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,752 0 10 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21
31 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,000 0 12 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21
32 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,998 0 12 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21
33 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,883 0 12 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21
34 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,814 0 12
35 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12
36 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12
37 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,582 0 12
40 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12