H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Tommy Robredo vs Pablo Andujar H2H: 2-2

Tommy Robredo and Pablo Andujar are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Pablo Andujar leads 2–0 on clay, while Tommy Robredo leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Robredo won the 2015 Cincinnati Open first round 3-6 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Robredo
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Pablo Andujar
ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tommy Robredo #26 3-6 6-3 6-1 Pablo Andujar #46 Match data Aug 18, 2015* R64 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Tommy Robredo #21 7-6(4) 6-4 Pablo Andujar #46 Match data Oct 25, 2014* QF Valencia ATP 500 Hard
Pablo Andujar #40 6-1 6-1 Tommy Robredo #17 Match data Feb 22, 2014* QF Rio Open ATP 500 Clay
Pablo Andujar #69 6-4 5-7 6-2 Tommy Robredo #31 Match data Feb 11, 2011* R16 Costa Do Sauipe ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,051 525 353 59.8% 0 1 0 1 10 12
Pablo Andujar #1,102 #32 1,205 1,862 164 241 40.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Robredo Pablo Andujar
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,793 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,760 0 1 2007 3–4 42.9% #146 1,641 0 0
22 2004 41–25 62.1% #13 1,831 0 2 2008 3–6 33.3% #101 1,603 0 0
23 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,851 0 2 2009 1–12 7.7% #160 1,527 0 0
24 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,867 0 4 2010 8–8 50.0% #71 1,703 0 0
25 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6 2011 25–28 47.2% #46 1,681 0 1
26 2008 35–23 60.3% #21 1,872 0 7 2012 19–29 39.6% #42 1,647 0 2
27 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,905 0 9 2013 18–31 36.7% #48 1,722 0 2
28 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9 2014 23–22 51.1% #41 1,828 0 3
29 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,785 0 10 2015 16–22 42.1% #64 1,789 0 3
30 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,768 0 10 2016 1–7 12.5% #432 1,639 0 3
31 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,004 0 12 — — — — — — —
32 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,999 0 12 2018 7–7 50.0% #82 1,659 0 4
33 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,884 0 12 2019 15–18 45.5% #64 1,722 0 4
34 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,813 0 12 2020 4–12 25.0% #60 1,627 0 4
35 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12 2021 12–18 40.0% #91 1,739 0 4
36 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12 2022 9–13 40.9% #121 1,622 0 4
37 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,583 0 12 2023 0–4 0.0% #1102 1,519 0 4
40 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tommy Robredo Pablo Andujar
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1999 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 10 7 17 58.8% 23 9 32 71.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 14 14 28 50.0% 14 7 21 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 10 14 24 41.7% 22 8 30 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2007 — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — —
22 2004 20 12 32 62.5% 14 7 21 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — —
23 2005 20 11 31 64.5% 18 9 27 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2009 0 2 2 0.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
24 2006 22 16 38 57.9% 22 6 28 78.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2010 1 2 3 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — —
25 2007 27 13 40 67.5% 18 9 27 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 3 11 14 21.4% 22 14 36 61.1% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
26 2008 12 14 26 46.2% 21 7 28 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2012 8 16 24 33.3% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 2009 17 13 30 56.7% 27 9 36 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2013 6 15 21 28.6% 12 14 26 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2010 15 15 30 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2014 8 12 20 40.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2011 8 7 15 53.3% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 2 9 11 18.2% 12 10 22 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
30 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2013 9 9 18 50.0% 25 10 35 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 25 13 38 65.8% 15 12 27 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — —
33 2015 11 10 21 52.4% 11 8 19 57.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2019 6 10 16 37.5% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 2016 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 7 8 12.5% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1 2 3 33.3% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — — 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
36 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2022 4 4 8 50.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
37 2019 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2023 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
40 2022 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 226 182 408 55.4% 256 130 386 66.3% 30 24 54 55.6% 13 17 30 43.3% — 44 105 149 29.5% 117 118 235 49.8% 3 18 21 14.3% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 853/878 of Tommy Robredo's and 400/405 of Pablo Andujar's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tommy Robredo Pablo Andujar
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1999 2/4 0.0 0.5 62.8% 65.2% 54.5% 55.0% 72.7% 61.7% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 2/2 0.0 3.5 63.6% 62.8% 26.7% 65.7% 16.7% 49.7% 28.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 52/57 3.5 2.9 64.8% 70.5% 51.2% 58.7% 47.5% 63.6% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 48/57 1.9 2.8 68.1% 63.7% 50.6% 54.5% 40.3% 59.2% 40.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 63/64 2.7 2.9 68.6% 66.9% 51.0% 52.8% 43.5% 61.9% 40.1% 2007 7/7 0.7 1.9 66.3% 64.8% 46.3% 61.1% 30.7% 58.8% 41.0%
22 2004 62/66 4.3 3.1 59.8% 71.5% 50.1% 59.9% 39.7% 63.1% 37.9% 2008 9/9 1.9 3.2 72.5% 63.3% 43.8% 57.9% 48.8% 57.8% 39.0%
23 2005 65/66 3.8 2.9 61.4% 71.2% 50.2% 58.0% 40.5% 63.0% 41.5% 2009 13/13 1.8 3.5 62.9% 60.3% 47.1% 45.6% 27.5% 55.0% 34.6%
24 2006 75/75 3.2 1.8 69.2% 68.7% 53.3% 62.1% 48.3% 63.8% 40.5% 2010 16/16 1.4 2.6 66.3% 63.5% 49.0% 44.1% 41.3% 58.7% 39.0%
25 2007 73/73 3.7 1.7 67.2% 68.6% 55.3% 58.6% 47.8% 64.1% 40.7% 2011 53/53 1.6 2.6 61.4% 64.9% 49.3% 54.6% 47.4% 58.9% 39.6%
26 2008 57/58 3.1 1.5 68.4% 69.0% 52.3% 59.2% 40.6% 63.7% 38.8% 2012 48/48 1.6 4.8 58.7% 63.3% 47.6% 49.6% 43.3% 57.0% 39.4%
27 2009 70/70 4.2 2.1 63.4% 71.5% 55.2% 61.6% 43.4% 65.5% 38.9% 2013 49/49 1.5 3.4 60.1% 65.2% 47.6% 60.0% 42.4% 58.1% 37.2%
28 2010 43/43 4.3 2.1 64.8% 69.7% 54.5% 49.4% 40.9% 63.9% 36.1% 2014 44/45 1.5 2.3 64.7% 64.8% 52.6% 53.6% 43.7% 60.3% 41.1%
29 2011 32/34 3.8 2.4 62.5% 70.7% 55.4% 61.5% 40.1% 64.9% 38.8% 2015 38/38 2.4 2.4 66.9% 64.8% 52.5% 56.2% 42.5% 60.4% 39.3%
30 2012 12/12 4.8 2.2 60.7% 70.5% 49.6% 62.9% 64.6% 62.1% 35.8% 2016 8/8 2.0 2.5 66.8% 65.1% 43.3% 38.1% 50.3% 58.0% 36.1%
31 2013 56/56 4.5 2.2 60.6% 71.6% 52.3% 59.5% 42.7% 64.0% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 69/69 5.1 2.0 63.8% 74.1% 54.0% 58.1% 39.6% 66.8% 37.2% 2018 14/14 1.1 2.1 66.5% 63.1% 50.9% 49.9% 42.9% 58.9% 43.1%
33 2015 43/43 3.7 2.0 62.8% 69.8% 51.3% 57.9% 45.1% 63.1% 36.4% 2019 32/33 1.8 3.1 65.0% 65.9% 46.8% 53.4% 38.3% 59.2% 37.7%
34 2016 8/8 5.0 2.6 61.4% 65.4% 49.3% 59.3% 30.0% 58.6% 30.2% 2020 16/16 1.0 3.8 62.3% 65.9% 47.8% 56.9% 39.8% 59.2% 38.3%
35 2017 17/17 2.2 1.6 65.1% 63.1% 47.3% 60.3% 47.0% 57.5% 35.1% 2021 28/30 2.2 4.5 63.7% 64.8% 45.8% 57.7% 44.1% 57.9% 39.0%
36 2018 2/2 2.0 3.0 63.5% 76.4% 52.9% 37.5% 14.3% 67.7% 27.0% 2022 21/22 1.2 4.5 65.1% 63.6% 45.5% 54.4% 47.8% 57.4% 38.9%
37 2019 1/1 2.0 2.0 60.8% 61.3% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0% 52.9% 28.6% 2023 4/4 0.5 4.5 63.6% 49.1% 41.5% 39.5% 41.7% 46.7% 35.8%
40 2022 1/1 0.0 1.0 64.4% 44.8% 37.5% 0.0% 0.0% 42.2% 31.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tommy Robredo Pablo Andujar
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1999 1534 111.3 -1.11 +0.08 1.149 52.8% — +25 — 44.4% -0.44 1–0 1–1 — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 1496 104.2 -0.33 -3.63 0.558 40.7% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1762 138.8 +1.70 +1.94 1.118 52.1% -113 +59 -142 59.9% +0.69 13–8 (62%) 16–10 (62%) — +1.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 1794 141.9 -1.86 +2.88 0.984 49.6% -51 +86 -168 50.0% -0.11 15–7 (68%) 11–10 (52%) — +0.25 2006 1500 97.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 1760 144.7 -0.06 +2.81 1.054 50.9% -81 +199 -70 53.8% +0.23 13–8 (62%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.05 2007 1641 120.5 -0.88 +0.96 0.993 49.9% — +64 — 38.5% -0.31 0–1 0–1 — -0.13
22 2004 1831 146.9 +0.42 +1.52 1.025 50.4% -13 +109 -123 56.6% +0.25 17–6 (74%) 15–11 (58%) — 0.00 2008 1603 123.0 -1.80 +0.19 0.925 48.4% — +131 — 36.0% -0.60 1–1 1–4 (20%) — -0.07
23 2005 1852 145.0 +0.69 +3.15 1.121 51.7% +8 +79 -187 58.9% +0.51 12–8 (60%) 9–8 (53%) — +1.57 2009 1528 112.1 -4.44 -1.83 0.769 45.0% — +94 +15 21.9% -2.16 0–3 (0%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.45
24 2006 1868 151.1 +1.63 +3.35 1.119 52.0% -22 +147 -213 62.8% +0.78 12–12 (50%) 13–11 (54%) — +1.81 2010 1704 127.5 -2.91 -0.31 0.944 48.7% -298 +150 — 50.0% -0.15 3–4 (43%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.67
25 2007 1857 150.3 +1.34 +3.23 1.134 52.3% +18 +126 -200 61.5% +0.75 16–10 (62%) 11–12 (48%) — +3.75 2011 1682 142.1 -3.31 +1.86 0.963 49.5% -262 +224 -224 45.8% -0.28 7–4 (64%) 5–8 (38%) — +1.11
26 2008 1873 148.9 +1.00 +2.34 1.071 51.1% -73 +190 — 55.9% +0.27 8–6 (57%) 15–9 (63%) — -0.66 2012 1648 141.7 -4.98 +1.68 0.916 48.1% -112 +167 — 42.7% -0.66 7–11 (39%) 11–7 (61%) — +2.10
27 2009 1905 153.5 +2.25 +1.71 1.126 52.0% -15 +119 -212 60.7% +0.69 14–3 (82%) 15–5 (75%) — +2.30 2013 1723 143.9 -4.35 +0.71 0.886 47.8% -86 +64 — 36.5% -0.90 7–10 (41%) 4–10 (29%) — +0.42
28 2010 1797 144.2 +0.33 -0.22 1.000 49.7% +33 +108 — 47.0% -0.24 5–8 (38%) 7–8 (47%) — +1.62 2014 1829 154.7 -2.21 +3.99 1.033 50.6% -119 +88 — 50.0% +0.07 5–8 (38%) 1–10 (9%) — -0.85
29 2011 1786 146.5 +1.92 +0.31 1.105 51.8% +44 +149 — 62.2% +0.76 6–2 (75%) 5–4 (56%) — +2.04 2015 1789 148.0 -2.34 +2.40 0.992 49.7% -168 +142 -303 46.9% -0.13 6–9 (40%) 6–7 (46%) — -1.10
30 2012 1768 135.0 +0.23 -0.69 0.947 49.1% +22 +146 — 51.6% -0.48 0–4 (0%) 1–0 — -0.13 2016 1639 110.7 -2.76 -0.49 0.860 47.0% -100 +213 — 22.2% -1.78 1–1 0–2 — -0.18
31 2013 2004 157.9 +1.54 +1.91 1.083 51.3% -155 +67 -307 58.8% +0.55 14–4 (78%) 14–9 (61%) — -0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1999 163.7 +2.95 +1.79 1.118 51.6% +11 -78 -165 59.1% +0.51 10–10 (50%) 24–20 (55%) — +0.70 2018 1660 127.2 -1.98 +4.21 1.049 50.8% — +129 — 53.3% +0.33 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.39
33 2015 1885 151.8 -1.22 +0.52 0.987 49.7% +56 +17 -99 52.3% -0.03 10–7 (59%) 6–7 (46%) — +1.91 2019 1723 140.9 -4.05 +1.79 0.922 48.3% -109 +105 — 43.9% -0.55 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) — -0.59
34 2016 1814 131.0 -1.43 -1.82 0.730 45.3% +32 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–1 3–3 (50%) — -0.56 2020 1628 133.5 -2.24 +0.41 0.940 48.4% -53 +127 — 32.5% -0.97 0–5 (0%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.16
35 2017 1741 121.5 -3.64 -0.64 0.826 46.6% +76 -4 — 36.6% -0.83 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.84 2021 1739 137.5 -4.15 +2.05 0.926 48.8% -128 +66 — 45.9% -0.36 6–8 (43%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.40
36 2018 1685 121.0 -3.18 +3.15 0.838 46.8% — — — 16.7% -1.34 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.31 2022 1622 128.4 -3.35 +0.90 0.912 48.5% +5 +51 — 45.5% -0.49 2–4 (33%) 4–3 (57%) — +1.21
37 2019 1583 99.7 -0.51 -0.32 0.607 41.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.30 2023 1520 95.2 -4.98 -1.21 0.672 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.17 — — — +0.23
38 2020 1582 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 1514 92.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2022 1503 96.1 -0.65 -5.56 0.541 36.6% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2051 153.4 +0.86 +1.96 1.064 51.0% -18 +95 -163 56.4% +0.35 169–107 (61%) 178–143 (55%) 107.1 +1.61 — 1862 143.7 -3.41 +1.63 0.938 48.7% -123 +126 -195 42.7% -0.51 51–75 (40%) 52–67 (44%) 95.7 +0.55

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.