H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tommy Robredo vs Paul-Henri Mathieu H2H: 4-2

Tommy Robredo holds a 4–2 lead over Paul-Henri Mathieu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Tommy Robredo leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Tommy Robredo won the 2015 Bastad quarterfinal 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Robredo
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Paul-Henri Mathieu
FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 25, 2015* Bastad ATP 250 QF Clay Tommy Robredo #21 6-3 6-3 Paul-Henri Mathieu #121 Match data
Nov 4, 2006* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R16 Carpet Tommy Robredo #7 6-4 7-6(1) Paul-Henri Mathieu #54 Match data
May 20, 2006* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Tommy Robredo #12 6-3 6-3 Paul-Henri Mathieu #38 Match data
Aug 13, 2003* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Paul-Henri Mathieu #54 6-4 4-6 6-3 Tommy Robredo #16 Match data
Oct 3, 2002* Moscow ATP 250 R32 Carpet Paul-Henri Mathieu #83 6-7(4) 7-5 6-2 Tommy Robredo #36 Match data
Feb 14, 2002* Marseille ATP 250 R32 Hard Tommy Robredo #34 6-4 6-4 Paul-Henri Mathieu #151 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,048 523 351 59.8% 0 1 0 0 11 12
Paul-Henri Mathieu #914 #12 2,000 1,961 268 297 47.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Robredo Paul-Henri Mathieu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0 2000 2–3 40.0% #275 1,487 0 0
19 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1 2001 0–2 0.0% #150 1,468 0 0
20 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,794 0 1 2002 23–14 62.2% #36 1,838 0 2
21 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,761 0 1 2003 16–23 41.0% #83 1,683 0 2
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #13 1,823 0 2 2004 9–10 47.4% #123 1,661 0 2
23 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,849 0 2 2005 26–27 49.1% #46 1,720 0 2
24 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,868 0 4 2006 23–28 45.1% #55 1,668 0 2
25 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6 2007 45–23 66.2% #25 1,870 0 4
26 2008 35–22 61.4% #21 1,882 0 7 2008 29–25 53.7% #31 1,746 0 4
27 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,903 0 9 2009 28–29 49.1% #33 1,748 0 4
28 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9 2010 10–19 34.5% #97 1,731 0 4
29 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,760 0 10 — — — — — — —
30 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,752 0 10 2012 14–17 45.2% #58 1,822 0 4
31 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,000 0 12 2013 6–19 24.0% #129 1,720 0 4
32 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,998 0 12 2014 11–17 39.3% #96 1,759 0 4
33 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,883 0 12 2015 7–12 36.8% #95 1,761 0 4
34 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,814 0 12 2016 18–20 47.4% #73 1,679 0 4
35 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12 2017 1–9 10.0% #249 1,574 0 4
36 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,582 0 12 — — — — — — —
40 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12 — — — — — — —