H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Tommy Robredo vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 4-2

Tommy Robredo holds a 4–2 lead over Radek Stepanek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Tommy Robredo leads 3–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Radek Stepanek won the 2008 Roland Garros third round 6-3 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Robredo
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Radek Stepanek
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 186 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 31, 2008* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Radek Stepanek #22 6-3 6-2 6-1 Tommy Robredo #14 Match data
Jan 10, 2008* Sydney ATP 250 R32 Hard Radek Stepanek #32 6-4 6-2 Tommy Robredo #11 Match data
Mar 27, 2007* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Tommy Robredo #6 7-6(4) 5-7 7-6(3) Radek Stepanek #26 Match data
May 22, 2006* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 F Clay Tommy Robredo #7 6-1 6-3 6-3 Radek Stepanek #11 Match data
Apr 29, 2006* Barcelona ATP 250 QF Clay Tommy Robredo #15 6-3 6-2 Radek Stepanek #16 Match data
May 14, 2003* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Tommy Robredo #22 6-4 6-3 Radek Stepanek #47 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,048 523 351 59.8% 0 1 0 0 11 12
Radek Stepanek #492 #8 2,700 2,034 366 283 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Robredo Radek Stepanek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1 1998 0–1 0.0% #165 1,488 0 0
20 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,794 0 1 1999 2–4 33.3% #169 1,501 0 0
21 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,761 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #13 1,823 0 2 2001 0–1 0.0% #542 1,464 0 0
23 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,849 0 2 2002 17–14 54.8% #63 1,659 0 0
24 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,868 0 4 2003 24–22 52.2% #46 1,716 0 0
25 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6 2004 28–23 54.9% #33 1,790 0 0
26 2008 35–22 61.4% #21 1,882 0 7 2005 45–26 63.4% #20 1,840 0 0
27 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,903 0 9 2006 30–15 66.7% #19 1,865 0 1
28 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9 2007 27–21 56.2% #30 1,863 0 2
29 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,760 0 10 2008 31–23 57.4% #27 1,837 0 2
30 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,752 0 10 2009 44–19 69.8% #12 2,010 0 4
31 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,000 0 12 2010 17–15 53.1% #62 1,872 0 4
32 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,998 0 12 2011 30–24 55.6% #28 1,880 0 5
33 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,883 0 12 2012 21–19 52.5% #31 1,930 0 5
34 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,814 0 12 2013 14–16 46.7% #44 1,828 0 5
35 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12 2014 16–17 48.5% #68 1,801 0 5
36 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12 2015 7–10 41.2% #197 1,766 0 5
37 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,582 0 12 2016 10–11 47.6% #107 1,866 0 5
38 — — — — — — — 2017 3–2 60.0% #354 1,900 0 5
40 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12 — — — — — — —