H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tommy Robredo vs Robin Soderling H2H: 1-5

Robin Soderling holds a 5–1 lead over Tommy Robredo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Robin Soderling leads 3–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Robin Soderling won the 2010 Beijing third round 4-6 6-1 6-4.

ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 5
6 main draw meetings
SWE Age 41 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 7, 2010* Beijing ATP 500 R32 Hard Robin Soderling #5 4-6 6-1 6-4 Tommy Robredo #42 Match data
Oct 9, 2009* Beijing ATP 500 R16 Hard Robin Soderling #11 6-3 6-3 Tommy Robredo #17 Match data
Jul 31, 2008* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Robin Soderling #45 7-6(6) 6-4 Tommy Robredo #16 Match data
Apr 23, 2008* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Tommy Robredo #18 6-4 7-6(3) Robin Soderling #49 Match data
Oct 7, 2004* Lyon ATP 250 R32 Carpet Robin Soderling #47 6-1 6-4 Tommy Robredo #16 Match data
Jul 9, 2004* Bastad ATP 250 R16 Clay Robin Soderling #48 6-0 4-6 6-3 Tommy Robredo #19 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,048 523 351 59.8% 0 1 0 0 11 12
Robin Soderling #195 #4 6,055 2,172 285 166 63.2% 0 1 0 2 7 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Robredo Robin Soderling
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 1–1 50.0% #444 1,518 0 0
17 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0 2002 1–5 16.7% #163 1,554 0 0
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0 2003 10–6 62.5% #60 1,728 0 0
19 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1 2004 31–26 54.4% #34 1,824 0 1
20 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,794 0 1 2005 16–18 47.1% #77 1,737 0 2
21 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,761 0 1 2006 33–22 60.0% #25 1,823 0 2
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #13 1,823 0 2 2007 22–15 59.5% #41 1,831 0 2
23 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,849 0 2 2008 40–19 67.8% #17 1,959 0 3
24 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,868 0 4 2009 44–23 65.7% #8 2,070 0 4
25 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6 2010 53–22 70.7% #5 2,118 0 6
26 2008 35–22 61.4% #21 1,882 0 7 2011 34–9 79.1% #13 2,127 0 10
27 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,903 0 9
28 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9
29 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,760 0 10
30 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,752 0 10
31 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,000 0 12
32 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,998 0 12
33 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,883 0 12
34 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,814 0 12
35 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12
36 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12
37 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,582 0 12
40 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12