H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tommy Robredo vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 3-1
Tommy Robredo holds a 3–1 lead over Sergiy Stakhovsky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tommy Robredo leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tommy Robredo won the 2017 Marrakech third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017* | Marrakech | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Tommy Robredo | 6-4 6-4 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| Jan 23, 2011* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Tommy Robredo | 5-7 6-2 6-4 6-2 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| Aug 26, 2010* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 7-6(5) 6-2 | Tommy Robredo | Match data |
| Mar 14, 2010* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Tommy Robredo | 3-6 6-3 7-5 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Robredo | #1,059 | #5 | 2,770 | 2,048 | 523 | 351 | 59.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Tommy Robredo | Sergiy Stakhovsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1999 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #244 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #30 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #21 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #13 | 1,823 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 2005 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #19 | 1,849 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 |
| 2006 | 49–26 | 65.3% | #7 | 1,868 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 2007 | 48–25 | 65.8% | #10 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 2008 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,882 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 2009 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #16 | 1,903 | 0 | 9 | 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 |
| 2010 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #50 | 1,796 | 0 | 9 | 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 2011 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 10 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 2012 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #114 | 1,752 | 0 | 10 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 2013 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #18 | 2,000 | 0 | 12 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 2014 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #17 | 1,998 | 0 | 12 | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| 2015 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #42 | 1,883 | 0 | 12 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #358 | 1,814 | 0 | 12 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #164 | 1,740 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,684 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,582 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,502 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |